ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

SQZ Serica Energy Plc

131.00
2.40 (1.87%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Serica Energy Plc LSE:SQZ London Ordinary Share GB00B0CY5V57 ORD USD0.10
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  2.40 1.87% 131.00 130.00 130.70 131.70 128.90 129.60 2,062,828 16:35:03
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 632.64M 102.98M 0.2623 4.99 504.89M
Serica Energy Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SQZ. The last closing price for Serica Energy was 128.60p. Over the last year, Serica Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 127.00p to 271.00p.

Serica Energy currently has 392,604,801 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Serica Energy is £504.89 million. Serica Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 4.99.

Serica Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 34776 to 34796 of 35925 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  1396  1395  1394  1393  1392  1391  1390  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/2/2024
17:35
Sensible view imo would be to hold off buying or adding until we have results and a divi. The new management might not be so wedded to that juicy dividend.
lord gnome
21/2/2024
10:39
Yield 12.2%, final divi due to be announced around 11 April?
bountyhunter
21/2/2024
10:32
just wondering what the upside is with this stock. Im underwater with it and I hate taking a significant loss but I can't see how this meaningfully recovers from here, certainly in the next 6 months? and other opportunities with a clearer picture beckon ..
seekinvalue
21/2/2024
08:51
I wouldn't bet on it.
lord gnome
21/2/2024
08:26
Seems incredibly good value at these levels, all of those issues are priced in, surely?
scepticalinvestor
21/2/2024
08:14
You've got a heck of a lot of history to catch up with, SI. Firstly, the whole sector is out of favour. Secondly WFT is hitting profits. Thirdly, someone should write a book about the recent deal for Tailwind.Sentiment here is rock bottom.
lord gnome
21/2/2024
08:10
Have started watching this. I get that the CEO is leaving but why the huge drift down in mkt cap? Started before he left
scepticalinvestor
20/2/2024
15:52
Begs the question why anybody would vote for either Labour or the Conservatives.

Completely useless the lot of them.

duckdown
20/2/2024
07:27
i agree Joe, they are pandering to the green vote over working class peoples jobs 78% tax from 75%, no new licenses. yet, china and all just do what they want.
nakedmolerat
20/2/2024
05:13
Labour will kill our O&G industry. They will allow the EU to finish the job and kill all our manufacturing industries.
joestalin
19/2/2024
17:19
The WFT (and labour intending to extend it) has crushed many Co’s and will undoubtedly lead to further job losses.
yasx
19/2/2024
14:51
I often look at charts .Some do some don't bother . The H@s targeted £1.70 ish .A small gap on the chart down at £1.40 from some time ago. Surely not.
If it gets to £1.70ish i'll buy back in despite exposing myself to the hated WFT even more.
Got quite a few HBR (at least they are trying to diversify unlike SQZ ) so felt that enough in the semi uninvestable NS oil sector....lol
But a bargain is a bargain and i'll have to hold my nose.
imho

pineapple1
19/2/2024
14:16
Company apparently cut FCF forecast via house broker hence the drop to the low 180s. Hopefully support at 179-178 holds.
oilinvestoral
13/2/2024
11:51
" I'd forgotten to include the Tailwind debt."------------------Exactamundo! Mercuria pilliaged copious amounts of dividends and loaded up the company with debt to the gullets before selling it on! Hence why it's best to always always always look at EV rather than cash cost!
oilinvestoral
13/2/2024
10:24
No don't bother, I'd forgotten to include the Tailwind debt.
farmscan
13/2/2024
10:22
Out of interest, could you show your workings on how you come up with the figure of $21.5/bbl? TIA
farmscan
13/2/2024
09:57
With regards to my post # 5656 . While we on the subject of acquisition acumen by management teams. JSE has just been suspended as they are one of the final bidders for Woodside's assets. We don't know the final details but based on press speculation it looks like being priced at a $6.7 / bbl 2P reserves valuation Vs the master stroke of tailwind form PE ($21.5 / bbl)! Also comes with double Tailwinds 2022 production.
oilinvestoral
10/2/2024
16:33
MarioPeter isn't suggesting anything! Has hit the nail square on the head! His post 4283 from over a year ago demonstrates to anyone with a basic reading & comprehension level that Mercuria invested the square root of zilch into Tailwind from their own money, they loaded it with debt and harvested egregious amounts of dividends from any cash flow that was generated! The 60 odd million they received from Serica in cash was multiples of any cash they personally invested ! The accounts confirm this! As for the shares they received for free at at slightly below 280p, I certainly wouldn't refer to those as "bought a chunk"! They are known in the industry as "a free kicker"! They are literally laughing all the way to the bank !!!
oilinvestoral
10/2/2024
13:00
Bruce infill well:
steelwatch
09/2/2024
20:41
Hopefully Labour will continue to U-turn up to the Election -
nigelpm
09/2/2024
20:06
Yes Stemis - that was one of Mitch's real drivers for the Tailwind deal - diversification away from gas and indeed since then the gas price has tanked and oil is barely moved.

The real mistake of Serica mgmt was not hedging the gas price significantly more than they did at some of the loopy prices - clearly they wouldn't have got away with hedging at the very elevated levels but 125-150/therm would have been sensible - as ever though Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

nigelpm
Chat Pages: Latest  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  1396  1395  1394  1393  1392  1391  1390  Older