
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Income Fund Limited | LSE:SEQI | London | Ordinary Share | GG00BV54HY67 | ORD NPV |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.80 | 77.20 | 77.80 | 77.00 | 77.60 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trust,ex Ed,religious,charty | 131.92M | 110.43M | 0.0730 | 10.55 | 1.17B |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
16:35:16 | UT | 122,660 | 77.00 | GBX |
Date | Time | Source | Headline |
---|---|---|---|
17/3/2025 | 08:55 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld NAV and Investment Update |
17/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
14/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
13/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
12/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
11/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
10/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
07/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
06/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
05/3/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Sequoia Economic Infra Inc Fd Ld Transaction in Own Shares |
Sequoia Economic Infrast... (SEQI) Share Charts1 Year Sequoia Economic Infrast... Chart |
|
1 Month Sequoia Economic Infrast... Chart |
Intraday Sequoia Economic Infrast... Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
09/3/2025 | 11:00 | Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Income Fund | 586 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
16:35:16 | 77.00 | 122,660 | 94,448.20 | UT |
16:28:47 | 76.90 | 80 | 61.52 | O |
16:28:46 | 77.10 | 803 | 619.11 | O |
16:28:46 | 77.00 | 1,664 | 1,281.28 | AT |
16:28:46 | 77.00 | 1,729 | 1,331.33 | AT |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 17/3/2025 08:20 by Sequoia Economic Infrast... Daily Update Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Income Fund Limited is listed in the Trust,ex Ed,religious,charty sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SEQI. The last closing price for Sequoia Economic Infrast... was 77.40p.Sequoia Economic Infrast... currently has 1,512,406,607 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Sequoia Economic Infrast... is £1,164,553,087. Sequoia Economic Infrast... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 10.55. This morning SEQI shares opened at 77.60p |
Posted at 09/3/2025 11:00 by spangle93 Kepler article on infrastructure, featuring SEQI |
Posted at 20/2/2025 09:50 by red ninja SEQI featured today in Shares Magazine (20/2/25) article :-Note, SEQIs chart figures in box section "These Ones Haven't Started Moving Yet" " MORE INVESTMENT IS NEEDED Infrastructure and renewable companies benefit from strong structural growth drivers such as increasingly urbanisation, the transition to net zero emissions and the digital revolution. Many countries around the world need to upgrade their infrastructure: the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) estimates £5 trillion of investment is required every year from now to 2030 to develop and support the world’s infrastructure needs. Randall Sandstrom, chief executive and chief investment officer of Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Income (SEQI), comments: ‘There is currently a significant requirement for infrastructure developments, particularly in our core geographies of the US, UK and Europe. ‘However, there is a shortfall between the capital that traditional lenders can provide and the requirements of many infrastructure projects. SEQI fills this real and persistent funding gap.’ " |
Posted at 19/2/2025 19:38 by chucko1 The solution is to have both HL and ii. So when HL go barmy as they have done with this whole IT costs issue, I have ii to take the strain of things like SEQI. Also, ii are far more efficient when it comes to corporate events, paying due cash and enabling trading again.That said, whoever makes these sorts of decisions at HL is a cretin. |
Posted at 19/2/2025 16:42 by spangle93 Totally agree - I'm split between Charles Stanley direct, and HL. The HL navigation and features are so much better than CSD, e.g. goodness knows where I'd find bonds on CSD. If you don't accept a price within 15 seconds, CSD also makes you start the buy/sell process (tick to say you've read T&C, KIIDs, insert password) again, which is irritating, compared to HL where you just hit requote.But CSD didn't have problems with me buying companies like SEQI, they're cheaper for a full service provider than HL, customer service is less patronising than HL, and they also offer £50 of free trades every few months. |
Posted at 13/2/2025 08:50 by nickelmer BBGi had the same problems, not that they are a debt fund, but infrastructure, I kept buying them and then one day they get taken out at a much higher price, if the price of SEQi stays this low for a long period I would guess that either they receive a take out offer, management decides to take them private at a premium to whatever the share price might be, or they could simply return all cash to shareholders once all loans are repaid which takes them to NAV (94p) again at a much higher price than today, hence, i keep buying these |
Posted at 15/1/2025 22:29 by value hound Interesting article from the IC's "Ideas Farm":-- The curious case of infrastructure debt trusts Investors are tarring infrastructure debt with the equity brush As an asset class, ‘infrastructur Just cast an eye over Winterflood’s daily round-up of the UK’s investment trust sector. If it traded at book value, the renewable energy grouping would be worth £12bn, not £8bn. Energy efficiency names sit at an inefficient 42 per cent below net asset value (NAV). Battery storage plays fare worse. While some of these discounts might be explained by the dashed hopes of the 2020-21 environmental, social and governance (ESG) boom era (not to mention a dramatic shift in borrowing costs), even vanilla infra-funds look horrible, with both the ‘social’ and ‘economic̵ We might attribute equity stake markdowns to the impact of higher finance costs, rising real-world risks and investor uncertainty over where underlying asset values will land. But it doesn’t explain why the infrastructure debt sector appears to have been tarred with the same brush. So here’s a good question, courtesy of reader Alastair: why has the infra-debt discount endured, while several members of the credit, loans and bonds sector held value? He cites the 16 per cent discount on Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Income (SEQI), at a time when Invesco Bond Income Plus (BIPS) trades at a slight premium, as an example of the discrepancy. SEQI has a lot going for it. It’s well diversified by geography, sector and number of loans. The average equity cushion for the subsidiaries it lends to is 37 per cent, meaning the average asset would need to go belly up before writedowns get painful. Indeed, past precedent suggests infrastructure credit providers typically recover more from defaults than ordinary corporate lenders. The combination of weak bank financing, cash-strapped public coffers, and massive demand means SEQI’s self-sourced investment pipeline is strong. Capital spending is again in vogue. If private credit really is as appetising as logic would suggest, it’s hard to see why investors should apply a haircut to the £1.2bn fund. Liquidity is clearly a factor. Many of BIPS’ high-yielding fixed-income holdings can be bought and sold on Hargreaves Lansdown. Even the type of loans that a private credit trust like CVC Income & Growth (CVCG) trades in and out of are relatively liquid. SEQI, by contrast, holds to term. However, illiquidity means different things to different assets. Unlike private equity, SEQI’s realisation events are contractual. Unlike real estate, valuations are less determined by market forces. Liquidity aside, Winterflood research analyst Shavar Halberstadt suggests that the sector’s discounts can largely be attributed to a “higher incidence of defaults and write-downs”. The latter might be true of peer GCP Infrastructure Investments (GCP), whose 35 per cent discount reflects attempts to sell chunks of its concentrated portfolio. But SEQI, by contrast, has seen its NAV climb around 13 per cent since March 2022, to 94.9p. A fully covered dividend yield of 8.7 per cent also implies otherwise. Matt Dimond, head of client capital at SEQI’s investment adviser, SIMCo, points to two other forces. First is the allure of highly liquid government bonds, which continues to drain a big source of investor capital. In response, buybacks – while a sign of confidence – haven’t 'moved the needle' on price. Second, nerves. “In terms of sustained externalities and pressures [on investor decision-making], we’ve never seen this level of uncertainty,” Dimond notes. But while sentiment is the price of any public market, it ultimately doesn’t change the fundamentals. |
Posted at 12/1/2025 09:48 by cocopah When the gilt rates settle a bit the share price will continue its revival. The relentless focus on the share buyback helps too. Fundamentals are good here, so it’s a case of hold and enjoy the dividends IMHO. |
Posted at 05/12/2024 09:11 by red ninja It's a top 10 holding for me too, I've been accumulating in this recent depressed share price spell.When interest rates eventually trend down I expect that to be good for SEQI share price. DYOR |
Posted at 02/8/2024 15:32 by zeppo Wall St and Footsie down heavily as is SEQI share price Earlier we were up on the interest rate reduction but now??? |
Posted at 30/7/2024 08:37 by cocopah #chucko1 only my opinion, however I think that the share price was headed southwards (on the back of the interest rate rises like most other ITs) before the buyback decision. The Bulb issue did not help.Now we appear to be in a much healthier position. 12% of the share base has been repurchased (and c10% of the share base has been cancelled). When we get towards 15% I wouldn’t e surprised if the remaining 5% are cancelled. The Bulb issue is resolved and management have upped their game on due diligence. The smart move to buy interest rate swaps at 7% will continue to benefit us. Daily buyback volumes are prudent so money spent is not wasted at too high a purchase price. The share price has positively crossed the 50 day moving average. I remain positive but DYOR as always. 😎 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions