We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seeing Machines Limited | LSE:SEE | London | Ordinary Share | AU0000XINAJ0 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.08 | -1.82% | 4.315 | 4.295 | 4.42 | 4.41 | 4.255 | 4.39 | 3,332,964 | 13:46:25 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer Related Svcs, Nec | 57.77M | -15.55M | -0.0037 | -11.62 | 178.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/1/2021 16:39 | lfc4ever - instis behave in different ways. I encountered some really heavy, clumsy orders from time to time when I was a broker. As for takeover, it's distinctly possible the board weren't prepared to talk - or that the predator wanted to get a meaningful stake to give them a strong negotiating position ahead of an approach. Because of the stake building rules, such positions need to be built up quickly ahead of a forced position-disclosing RNS. It would certainly be next to impossible after such an RNS. Again, I encountered quite a few situations of this kind - in one (oil) company, there were no fewer than 6 hostile positions of 4.99% acquired! In those days 5% was the first disclosure level. | hiddendepths | |
13/1/2021 16:37 | RNS - Lol gone into Auction, time extension as MM's cannot keep up | zero the hero | |
13/1/2021 16:14 | Scottish Mortgage have been doing it with TSLA - its standard practice. | skinny | |
13/1/2021 16:12 | Quite common willoicc. | hazl | |
13/1/2021 15:43 | Seems quite mad being forced to sell winners and keep relative losers. | willoicc | |
13/1/2021 15:40 | I wouldn't have thought an institutional investor would buy in such a fashion as to cause such a spike - would be trying to gently build up a stake, surely? As a prelude to a takeover, however.... still not convinced- a deal would surely be agreed with board, prior to a recommendation being made to shareholders, rather than an attempt to build a stake first? | lfc4ever | |
13/1/2021 15:24 | No IIT just had to rebalance their fund. Became overweight on SEE due to rise. Normal practice. | lewbo18 | |
13/1/2021 15:24 | Wonder whats cooking | juju44 | |
13/1/2021 15:22 | Plenty going through at 10p now - highest volume for some time. | skinny | |
13/1/2021 15:21 | Looks as though there's really strong buying even after the day's rise. I suppose it could be a leak but I'm more inclined to think it's a proper buyer, either institutional or, possibly, predatory. There's been a lot of volume in the last few days and the pressure is still building. | hiddendepths | |
13/1/2021 15:21 | If this (extraordinary) spike is being fuelled by a leak, the company, being advised by Cenkos will be forced to put out an immediate announcement. | tarrant777 | |
13/1/2021 15:20 | Am I becoming redundant? | 10p here we come | |
13/1/2021 15:20 | Someone must know something, I'm feeling a bit left out | velvetide | |
13/1/2021 15:14 | This is a nice rise. Up 150% so far. Deal leak? | waterloo01 | |
13/1/2021 15:12 | I wonder if IIT were asked to sell a chunk to help accommodate a new holder, possibly an institution and possibly a strategic partner, looking for a stake. Would make sense of the price action if several of the large holders have been so approached. | hiddendepths | |
13/1/2021 15:12 | That's better. | skinny | |
13/1/2021 15:07 | It matters not really, quite funny SP just paid 9.40, astonishing this early in January. Thi is on the same day one of our II's have sold a chunk and our rival has announced a deal (albeit for the Chinese market). There must be news from CES leaked surely | zero the hero | |
13/1/2021 14:54 | Probably 🙄 I noticed my post 16633 @ 06:36 this morning, was marked down almost immediately - so I wonder if its some kind of algo? | skinny | |
13/1/2021 14:53 | Its Skinneys fault .... he complained back in July and the saddo has not stopped since. Nowt weirder than folk. But remember the share price has risen in cahoots with the downticker .... long live the downticker :-) | zero the hero | |
13/1/2021 14:27 | Who is the fool who spends her sad life red ticking all the posts? | nofool | |
13/1/2021 14:23 | ...SEE exceeded their max exposure imo I would be happy to have initial investment limits, but to have to continually trim your outperformers, that I cant get my head around, ultimately it would appear to bias investment returns towards your underperformers | velvetide | |
13/1/2021 13:37 | So many late trades being reported in the last few days-but looks very much like another day when we'll see well over 30m shares traded. We now know at least one of the institutions selling, and will in due course be very interesting to see which institution(s) is buying. | tarrant777 | |
13/1/2021 13:29 | Funds adjust their holdings to maintain a balanced portfolio. Probably with recent rise in share price SEE exceeded their max exposure % so they've balanced the holdings inline with their investment model | redchef | |
13/1/2021 11:09 | I have been here since the two pence days, and just increased along the way, and just continue to do so, 10p next target. dyor | srpactive | |
13/1/2021 10:02 | Holding for 15p | bitcoin tosser |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions