We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sdx Energy Plc | LSE:SDX | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BJ5JNL69 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.65 | 3.50 | 3.80 | 3.65 | 3.65 | 3.65 | 1,591,725 | 07:43:32 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/3/2019 09:45 | So tell me any of the details of the BP deal. | andyforster1 | |
01/3/2019 09:45 | We don't know if the BP deal will come back. Something else may come along. I've bought some more anyway on the drop. Feels like good value here with the increased production coming shortly and other organic and inorganic growth planned. | homebrewruss | |
01/3/2019 09:23 | Andy, if they are pursuing the BP deal again they will almost certainly need to stump up money and they don't have much spare after the CAPEX requirements they've already got planned. Enough basic research for you? | shakeypremis | |
01/3/2019 09:14 | Don't usually post on SDX but what is this absolute bull that their looking to raise cash ??? All capex requirements this year are covered from the balance sheet and cash flow. Why try and talk the stock down when very quick and basic research will show this to be untrue. The weakness is coming from stock being ported from the TSX, SIMPLE. Could there be further weakness?? Absolutely. Will it rectify itself over time ?? Absolutely. Does a situation like this offer a gift ?? In my opinion, Absolutely. | andyforster1 | |
01/3/2019 08:59 | Seems pretty cheap now with the production they have coming on late this half. What price are you looking for phowdo? | homebrewruss | |
01/3/2019 08:37 | Even without a potential deal SDX have quite significant capex commitments and free cash has fallen significantly. Placing is pretty much a dead cert anyway (IMHO) unless they go the debt route which would be dicey in a risk-off market. Of course we could see a SQZ-BP-like deal which added significant production at the right price and share price shoots through roof but the price action & my gut are telling me to sit on my hands even if that means a dearer top-up/entry point! | rollthedice | |
01/3/2019 08:16 | If there was a problem with the BP deal due to dual listing then tsx delist would also make sense. MEA would certainly buy in to any discounted placing. I do hope we aren't about to get screwed over. We should probably vote against the delist. Their reasoning is BS I don't trust them. They're up to something and the share price could be getting walked down to fund a placing. | shakeypremis | |
28/2/2019 23:40 | Every time Schachter was talking up beat about SDX on BNN the stock was reacting instantly on the TSX Venture market. Sometimes up to 10%, and settled back down the day after. At noon, he did talk about SDX and mentionned the coming TSXV delisting, the share price reaction followed. I bet we move back up tomorrow... hxxps://www.bnnbloom Pretty interesting, he mentions that the company got problems in the BP deal because of the dual listing, implying two different regulations. So, maybe we are heading back to the BP deal, just another bet... And shakey mate, your theory is what crossed my mind when they justified the delisting with the saving on costs BS... | keithr39 | |
28/2/2019 20:45 | shakey you should ask that question to PW, see what he says. This is absolutely ridiculous, 31p its trading in canada at present. | neo26 | |
28/2/2019 13:16 | The excuse is a crock! | jimboau | |
28/2/2019 12:52 | I personally don't believe SDX's line that the de-list is being done to save on costs. On the TSX if an entity holds more than 20% of the stock they must issue a takeover offer. On the AIM however, they can hold up to 30% before issuing a takeover offer. I personally think the de-list is either allow a takeover by the top holder (possibly in concert with the second largest holder), MEA Energy, who last year changed their name to SDX SPV Ltd or to simply allow MEA to acquire a larger stake in the company. They do have a person on the SDX board after after all, Michael Raynes. | shakeypremis | |
28/2/2019 11:56 | It's a major dummy spit & all because the TSX won't put up with the stunts they are surely looking to pull on the cesspit called AIM? What price 'freedom' eh? | jimboau | |
28/2/2019 11:35 | TSX holders can transfer to various brokers that will hold the AIM listed stock for them. Such as Interactive Brokers. There are others. Some entity must be buying all these dumped shares. They aren't going in to the ether. | shakeypremis | |
28/2/2019 11:06 | Management have thrown this at the mercy of the market here surely? TSX holders have no option but to dump shares, no? 3 months of dumping, multi year lows on the way? | jimboau | |
21/2/2019 12:04 | Tell me about it. | shakeypremis | |
21/2/2019 11:37 | In the meantime it if quite frustrating to be down at these levels. | ifthecapfits | |
20/2/2019 18:34 | Still holding after I sold BVC to buy SDX, BVC has since doubled in price, F@@k!!! | quemaster | |
20/2/2019 18:25 | Ghost town here. Has everyone sold out or something? | shakeypremis | |
14/2/2019 13:15 | shakey it does make sense, i recall a while ago when mea took shares in a placing wasnt quite sure if sdx actually needed cash at the time. Lets see, i believe once SD is online they can quickly increase production. They are drilling two more wells in SD this year maybe they might get to 100mmcfd through the pipeline. Mkt missing something here, i can see £1 by year end.# IMHO | neo26 | |
14/2/2019 12:43 | Neo26, could it perhaps be this; I suspect this move away from TSX is about more than just saving money (exactly how much money would this save anyway? - I will try to work this out later). On the TSX a shareholder holding 20% or more shares in a company is obliged to issue a takeover offer if I am not mistaken. On the AIM, this limit is 30%. This would allow the newly re-named MEA Energy (now interestingly called SDX SPV Limited) who currently hold ~19.5% of the shares and possibly also Ingalls and Snyder who hold ~18.5% to buy another 22% of the company between them, taking the total of their two holdings to 60% of the company. I do hope we are not about to be mugged off and taken private, or perhaps sold off on the cheap to another interested party with MEA Energy etc happy to take say 80p or something. If this is happening, PW etc must be in on it and set to be rewarded handsomely. | shakeypremis | |
14/2/2019 12:41 | i think the mkt has gone looney, when you have companies like panr which are valued more than companies actually producing. this should easily be 70p, cant wait till they delist from tsx maybe then this can move. there has to be a reason why directors want to come off TSX its not to save on listings thats for sure. | neo26 | |
13/2/2019 08:29 | All gone a bit flat this one - following BP shenanigans. | ifthecapfits |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions