Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 11:02

Loz - no one knows or cares about your profits. But a professional betting organisation would have a field day at the suggestion you have profited over the 6/7 years you've followed this dog. On the subject of LD and the value of the assets she is creating - silence :)

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 11:00

Tosh - are they really ALL the same people? I was not advocating buying at the higher levels and I'm sure many others currently posting were not either. Nor do you know what value we put on the opinions of those who were.

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 10:59

Panama - I'm not suggesting you should not criticise management. See my comments on lse. My point is - you are criticising shareholders for suggesting now may be a good buying opportunity. Really? I suspect you play a more critical role in your own financial decisions.

[the real lozan] 31/10/2018 10:53

PPPS-
Inane'n'co plays on the 'greed' of the unwary... to swallow trHYPE LIES/FALSE CLAIMS
The WISER,more ASTUTE...play the REALITY...to trouser PROFITS
.
Whenever the BUY,BUY BUY SCAM 'GROUP" mount an 'effort to curb their LOSSES' with trHYPE
The WISER, more ASTUTE are aware that an opportunty for PROFITS will surely follow
Some of *US* can't wait for the "This will be £10 / £12 a share in 'half an hour" that is SURE to arrive SOON...the longer the 7..50p holds

[panama7] 31/10/2018 10:33

Wigwammer, you just don't get it, in no way should the share price be at the level of 8p requiring. It is at that level because the BOD have failed to live up to anything they have stated to Investors for the last 6 years. They have failed to support the share price at any level. If Goodfellow the then CEO states at 34p he is going to sell the Company for many multiples than any share price below that price is a failure by the BOD. I guess yo were the one yesterday running around getting biscuits and coffee for the BOD and holding the door when they needed a leak.

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 10:12

Loz - I don't suspect for a second that you, and the vast majority of other "astooties" here have done anything other than lost a vast sum of money on SCLP over the years. But of course, none of you will admit it. Is the stock hyped now? It has its own dedicated anti-hype board here and the lse one is frequently at war with itself. So I suspect it isn't. LD seems like a smart lady who is developing something that may have great value. It is ok for investors to discuss this on an investment board. If you don't agree - don't buy. Simple :)

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 10:04

Panama - the investors who suggest the current levels are a great buying opportunity are not being disrespectful as you state, but are helping to support the value of your investment. It appears you want to fire the gun at everybody - all I suggest is, look a little more toward yourself.

[drdobson1] 31/10/2018 09:51

Wiggle.
The Astuties have been saying don’t by stocks inflated by trHYPE for years.
It is people like your friend PLUM who is the real menace lL IN NO RISk £8 a Share.
It is him who you should be aiming your Fire at and not the ones who have predicted this outcome for years

[panama7] 31/10/2018 09:46

Wigwammer, again from you total nonsense, I can assure you I did not buy on the hype on these boards and my average is considerably less than the vast majority of investors who are now sitting on massive losees. As I stated very forcibly yesterday there is absolutely no correlation between everything that has emanated from the BOD and the current situation which is very much down to the BOD.

[wigwammer] 31/10/2018 09:40

Panama - without the intervention of investors who see the lower levels as a good buying opportunity, the value of your investment would be even lower than it already is. While I'm sure some of your criticism of management is right and valid, I suspect the most valuable lesson for you is - don't buy stocks when they are inflated with hype.

[the real lozan] 31/10/2018 09:19

P7 -
So {lack of} business as usual ???
.
*WE ALL* see the M F F F calling for even MORE trHYPE =
underwater krafty1305
ANOTHER -Premium Chat Member
Price: 7.875
RE: Yesterday
Today 08:53
"The GC result is the one opportunity for a bit of hype whilst they are getting on with things, Suggested a photo opportunity with Mellman and the Biontech guy with Lindy. Good PR opportunity which must not be missed".
.
Would it not be 'better' to HOPE for RESULTS, rather than seek more HYPE opportunities ???

[drdobson1] 31/10/2018 09:15

Thanks P7 for pointing out to the people who can influence these things they need to up their game and the real people that invest their hard earned and are currently at a big loss they can ill afford.
Many of these folk do not understand the science and don’t post on these boards.That is another reason why baNANA is a total piece of dog s@@t as he preys on these type of vulnerable folk with his All in No Risk uttering gs and of course does not have the courage to even attend these meetings.
Utter and complete NOB

[drdobson1] 31/10/2018 08:04

Terror,
Ruddy brilliant.
One minor comment.I thought you were too kind to Der Leader as he must be a lot more than 75% down.
Guffaw guffaw guffaw guffaw
Right cheered me up on another day at the coal face of cutting edge science and commercial excellence

[the real lozan] 31/10/2018 07:54

Tarquin is WRONG AGAIN -
"Of course, I was disappointed NOT to figure this time but never mind. Thanks for the chuckle."
BUT
*WE ALL* know Tarquin DOES "figure this time"
As the 'whimpering wench' in the corridor... cos the BUY,BUY,BUY SCAM = FAILED

[torquayfan] 31/10/2018 04:25

Terror - your 18379 - the 'Club Meeting'. Very funny - congratulations !

I remember the last version years ago where you had TF saying, 'I tried to distract them by talking about football but that didn't work', or something to that effect.

Of course, I was disappointed NOT to figure this time but never mind. Thanks for the chuckle.

[drdobson1] 30/10/2018 21:59

Says on RNS all Resolutions passed.
Some feedback on real news of AGM posted on MFFF.
Consider if all questions had been submitted to baNANA as he wanted them to be rather than to BOD.SCIB 2 device baNANA says Ichnor.Well he is WRONG.
One attendee says BOD given ROUGH RIDE but PKUM says no one would be ANGRY.
Questions on FUNDING were asked and Answered but PLUM says No No No No you can’t ask those questions as Inside info zndvBID Cannit answer But they did today so PLUM WRONG again.
What a total PLANKton

[wigwammer] 30/10/2018 19:47

I'm not worried about the resolutions being passed, and nor should anyone else be :)