Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 19/6/2018 09:49

ONW you have nothing to add, because you have nothing to say ...

stop Puffing yourself up, at least boom can string a response that tries to get his message over that actually makes statements.

never seen any post from you that achieves that ...

[inanaco] 19/6/2018 09:39

that exactly what you do ...

"leave you to it" ...

rather than working through your statements or mine with reasoning .. you switch it to a black and white right or wrong.

your number 1 ... question seems to have forgotten that both scib1 and pd1 had been in trial.

you cannot dismiss the hypothesis as the trial comments are about the hypothesis add weight to it which is what the author wrote.

as for the other posts, that should have been dealt with Sunday, i even posted to Ray we should wait for your response

Sunday morning, i had no idea how the CD4 interact with an APC other than looking at Scancells diagrams ... 24 hrs later i had a far better understanding, i have explained this before, its the discussions that drive the research to add to your reasoning and understanding.

As for number 5 ... well clearly they are getting close .. we have product that works. SCIB1 and others PD1



ATB

[the real lozan] 19/6/2018 09:34

The 'imposter'... LOSSchild -
"i guess your swinging in the trees"
Some / MANY, might opine = In YOUR case....The 'Trees' would be classed as =
More advanced in the 'evolution status'... Trees don't LIE

[oldnotwise] 19/6/2018 09:28

Bermuda
Bravo
You've saved me another (probably pontless) post. There's nothing to add to your 16422... It says it all!
Thanks for posting.
ATB

[inanaco] 19/6/2018 09:18

glad your thinking for "BoB" now .. i am sure he is well pleased with that

anyway, usual low life responses ... have a good day

[inanaco] 19/6/2018 09:10

ONW,

LOL ...

and your what exactly ? if i lack intelligence, i guess your swinging in the trees

[oldnotwise] 19/6/2018 08:59

I try and keep out of this sort of stuff, but the kindest way I can put this is to say,
"Inanaco, you may have a great deal of knowledge but you lack intelligence."
That's about as succicnt as I can get, and if you consider the words maybe it will help you.
I hope so.
AIMO
ATB

[inanaco] 19/6/2018 08:54

These two posts here put this all into context ..........

which is why Boom tried to wriggle out of the discussion, rather than stay and work it through, basically it was left to me yet again to work through the reasoning.

which is what i did, including finding out that they had actually filmed a CD4 engaging an APC.

So really the issue is did anyone understand it, but i do agree with Ivy and Boom that the science is way over the head of most to trawl through to try an make sense of it for investment purposes, however that i have posted on before .. ie the Vids (presentations) are the best source for understanding purposes but what they don't do is look at the competition !! or cross reference the science to other Art to find proof of hypothesis.


C7 really ? Do you feel you can get the BB back by jumping into bed with Lozan .. ? every other post of his is an attack on you, why do it ?

nanaco
Posts: 27,285
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 14.00
RE: Boom its theMon 10:55so what your describing is a memory cell .........

"""" A CD4 T cell with surface receptors corresponding to those peptides then binds to the APC. """

A lymphocyte is shown in the center of this picture

1. After the naive T cell (N) encounters an antigen it becomes activated and begins to proliferate (divide) into many clones or daughter cells.
2. Some of the T cell clones will differentiate into effector T cells (E) that will perform the function of that cell (e.g. produce cytokines in the case of helper T cells or invoke cell killing in the case of cytotoxic T cells).
3. Some of the cells will form memory T cells (M) that will survive in an inactive state in the host for a long period of time until they re-encounter the same antigen and reactivate.
Memory T cells are a subset of infection- and cancer-fighting T cells (also known as a T lymphocyte) that have previously encountered and responded to their cognate antigen; thus, the term antigen-experienced T cell is often applied. Such T cells can recognize foreign invaders, such as bacteria or viruses, as well as cancer cells. Memory T cells have become "experienced" by having encountered antigen during a prior infection, encounter with cancer, or previous vaccination. At a second encounter with the invader, memory T cells can reproduce to mount a faster and stronger immune response than the first time the immune system responded to the pathogen that entered the body. This behaviour is utilized in T lymphocyte proliferation assays, which can reveal exposure to specific antigens.

now do you understand my reasoning ?
Reply | Recommend 1 | Reportinanaco
Posts: 27,285
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 14.00
Boom its theMon 10:30sunday 20.51 statement that i questioned

"""" A CD4 T cell with surface receptors corresponding to those peptides then binds to the APC. """

like i said "corresponding" does not make sense which is why i asked you to refine or reason it.

we are not experts, so the only way to work through this is reasoning ... and the result is probably not far from the mark.

[the real lozan] 19/6/2018 08:20

Surprise surprise -
Tarquin IMup =
"Lozan. I really don't want to waste time on this nonsense so BFN."
Well...Fancy that ???
.
IF, *WE ALL* could choose between EGO driven trHYPE / SCAM tactics / FALSE CLAIMS... OR other
I think *WE ALL* would prefer HONEST, BALANCED posting

[torquayfan] 19/6/2018 07:14

Lozan. I really don't want to waste time on this nonsense so BFN.

[the real lozan] 19/6/2018 06:57

Change of 'user name' -
It is quite clear, once AGAIN, that in, once AGAIN being the ONLY poster 'jumping-in' to DEFEND / WHITEWASH the evidence of inane cur's UNDERHAND misdeeds, Tarquin Eetup simply exposes / verifies the fact of being the co-founder of the BUY,BUY,BUY CLUB SCAM.
"Inan doesn't do that"....IF by this Tarquin Eetup is trying to say "Inan doesn't LIE"
HE DOES, and HE tries to DELIBERATELY DECEIVE / MISLEAD
.
Perhaps the moniker 'Tarquin IMup' is more apt ???
NO DOUBT... When exposing 'Tarquin IMup's' partener-in-CRIMES' as a FRAUD, Tarquin IMup, for SCAM purposes, would like *US ALL* to ..."Give it a break"
.
"It is clear to anyone that Inan is *without marks* = Cut and Pasting Dr Amy Lee Popple's work...PRETENDING it is HIS...in order to DECEIVE
"It is ALSO clear to anyone that", in repeatedly defending the FRAUDULENT Inan, Tarquin IMup is = ALSO... Trying to DECEIVE

[torquayfan] 19/6/2018 05:46

C7. Please clarify your 16410 - are you actually agreeing with Lozan's 16405 ?

[torquayfan] 19/6/2018 05:17

Lozan 16405. To suggest that Inan is claiming Ms. Popple's words as his own is just silly.

Inan doesn't do that - the words in 15.49 are obviously from another writer and this is emphasised clearly by the link he gives below.

It is clear to anyone that Inan is quoting - even without marks. Give it a break . .

[drdobson1] 18/6/2018 21:05

Evening All,
Could to see Your excursions across here Chelsea 35 and I know what I think about EGO BOY.
He try’s to BULL by Being a BOFFIN but more BOFFoon as so Transparent in his Motives.
Fools No one on here and apart from his Lackeys on other SIDE and great YOU call him out when he challenges you.

[chelsea35] 18/6/2018 20:07

Well two years late, better then never Loz we agree. I can see what he is trying to do, but really does anybody understand all that, or is it just to show everyone he appears clever?? I know what I think.

[the real lozan] 18/6/2018 18:32

"No."
So, Elsie 'Wouldn't put it past HIM ...either'
Better to FINALLY 'See the light'...later, than never to 'SEE it' at all.

[gazza] 18/6/2018 17:17

Loz, I'm pretty sure they don't give phds for cutting and pasting 3 pages of someone else's work.

[drdobson1] 18/6/2018 17:13

Very parceotive LOZ,
Saw DR Amy did not mention of support from Failed PRofessori PLUM OR Doctor baNANA.Perhaps he OPerates on a Higher Plane To everyone else and Remaibs him not to be NAMed just revered to as the ORACLE OR she Did not want to give any credence to the SAID individual as she could give NIT give a STuff about his Scientific input like most other right minded folk.

Guffaw guffaw

[chelsea35] 18/6/2018 16:44

Well normal drift on no news, we needed a reason to push past 15p. What we "should" be worth is irrelevant.

[chelsea35] 18/6/2018 15:20

Lozan, a very similar weekend, minus the logs and the sun lol. Enjoying life again really. Preparing myself to Winter.

Such a different feeling from feeling angry i couldn"t go about my life, just for the first time accepting i am retired and relearning what i can do, rather than even thinking about what i can"t.

Content i have a decent enough holding here to benefit as and when the potential bears fruition

Hoping others feel ""content"" too. That is all that matters to me now.