Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[tosh123] 01/5/2018 16:10

C7,
two totally separate things.
One is an uneducated buffoon, the other is a share with potential.

As for his one liners ! hahaha he cant even count... his last message was a nine liner for a start.

The guy is a compulsive liar, who has lost tens of thousands of pounds because he doesn't know what he's doing.

[chelsea35] 01/5/2018 15:45

Hi Tosh, TBH filling 95% of a share BB rubbishing Inanaco, rightly or wrongly, is tantamount to rubbishing the share. G-d only knows peoples perception of Scancell after reading this BB. ATB

[tosh123] 01/5/2018 15:09

You're always wrong.

And as for raining and being sunny at the same time, thats not unusual, especially during the Spring , what do you think happens when a rainbow is formed ? IDIOT.

You really do need to get some form of education.
I can suggest a few primary schools where you could start.

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 14:45

Loz weather forecast ... involves looking outside

Tosh weather forecast ... it will rain and be sunny at the same time (i am never wrong)

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 14:44

Loz No money talks well........ easy

[the real lozan] 01/5/2018 13:30

P S -
As for "rubbishing this cancer share" = Pure 'invention' ...as NO ONE IS
As for nanEGO....It 'stands-out' to all intelligent observers of this forum, that nanEGO is reduced to CON stantly, childishly referring to HIS 'image' of MY ....
'financial status / affairs'... of which HE knows nothing, but finds HIMSELF obsessed with.
Which, in view of the lamentable manner - *WE ALL* see clearly - HE manages HIS own 'financial affairs' is hardly surprising.

[the real lozan] 01/5/2018 12:54

Elsie The Dense -
Remember too - This is an OPEN FORUM, where folks CAN express their 'Alternative' opinions... that invariably have been PROVEN to have been VALID
NOT JUST the BUY,BUY,BUY, ONE VIEW ONLY, trHYPE... that invariably have been PROVEN NOT ONLY to have been INVALID / FALSE ... but VERY COSTLY
AND
Of course, IF you don't like it, you CAN always MICTURATE ELSEWHERE
AND
Feel free to take the EGO with you.

[tosh123] 01/5/2018 12:14

C7,
i have never rubbished the share.... only the village idiot.

[chelsea35] 01/5/2018 12:07

Remember too this BB is supposed to represent Scancell, and to discuss the share NOT to be 95% about arguing with inanaco and rubbishing this cancer share!!!

[chelsea35] 01/5/2018 11:59

Gazza............reasonable point. I most certainly have never rubbished IMM or any other share. Unfortunately since Yoda, Multibagger and a few others it got very personal.

You will find my posts in December congratulated VAL LTH, I am sure bermuda shorts will verify what occurred next.

Anyway hope you are good, and good luck whatever you are in.

ATB

Paul

[the real lozan] 01/5/2018 11:54

nanEGO and the trHYPE SCAM 'GROUP' definition ...
Known as 'ICEBERG' traders =
A 'common HAZARD / DANGER' and 80% 'underwater'.

[tosh123] 01/5/2018 11:51

hahahaha

Its called having a balanced portfolio... but you wouldn't understand anything with the word " balanced " in it.

As for you having capital, well, what we all know for a fact, is that you have FAR LESS than you used to, whereas my balanced portfolio has performed very nicely....

Your portfolio = minus 60% ( pathetic ).

My portfolio = + 30% ( last 12 months performance ).

You're an uneducated pathetic loser.... FACT.

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 11:37

Just hold share LOZ ... due to

1/ have capital


do you ?

[the real lozan] 01/5/2018 11:34

nanEGO -
" win some lose some"
That doesn't ACTUALLY apply to YOU though ..Does it ???

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 11:34

Lozan, you have NO money ... Hobby posting ? bored with France ?

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 11:31

Gazza, I assure you, i have Rubbished Vals results ... after all, so far they are just that, rubbish ....

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 11:30

I invest in Scancell because the science is so good, hence i don't need to spread the risk because i am an idiot that needs to learn by failure ..

That is the way Tosh invests .. The idiot buys anything .. win some lose some

[tosh123] 01/5/2018 10:38

Gazza,
i concur.
You learn more from the failures than from the successes.
There are many small bio's in this space, and most will fail, hence why the risk reward ratio is so high.
There are no guarantees, no matter what the resident idiot says. This is new science, and by any measurement, the risks are massive, however, with each trial the risks are gradually being mitigated.
Contrary to the buffoons uneducated posts, there are those of us that have worked hard to get a net position, and irrelevant of his fairy tales, will now hold until fruition, what ever that may be.
There is no need to trade anymore, the goal has been reached, so its now just a point of waiting. Either it hits the jackpot in about 2 years time, or it fails, its that simple.
All his nonsense about not buying or selling, is jealous waffle, designed to try and make himself sound and feel better ( he's still so far out of the money that he hates to see anyone else out trade him... his ego is hurting ). I am comfortable, i have placed my bet, and now i will leave my bet on the table and await the final outcome.... The ball is still spinning in the roulette wheel, why would i pick my free chips up ? ... and there are no doubt, many others in the same situation.
He just hates being outgunned.

[gazza] 01/5/2018 10:01

Inanaco, I never said not "discussed" I said "rubbished"

As for trials failing, this is the very nature of "research". You try things that have not been tried before, 90% will fail. It is only by getting through the failures that you achieve success. This is FIGHT against cancer. It won't be won by a single company (IMO). Companies involved in the fight should be applauded and encouraged.

[the real lozan] 01/5/2018 09:41

*WE ALL*, of reasonable intelligence, CAN clearly see - The obvious 'efforts to mislead'.. the 'invention' by Elsie the Dense, deliberately set-up to 'imply' =
""why you constantly rubbish Scancell in their efforts to even raise funds,""
.
I DO NOT ""rubbish Scancell"" at ALL...NEVER HAVE
.
I DO...""RUBBBISH"" the FALSE CLAIMS, LIES, trHYPE...Which the 'GROUP' employ, to urge folks ...under FALSE PRETENCES... to BUY,BUY,BUY
.
The FACT, that I, and others,EXPOSE their 'Blatant attempts to mislead' potential investors AWAY from the REALITY..is what 'upsets them' and leads them into 'bad-mouthing' me,and others,by 'making-up' an IMAGE.
An IMAGE that *WE ALL* KNOW, is designed to 'draw the unwary' AWAY from the REALITY
.
In this case - Elsie The Dense, PROVES this by FALSE CLAIM inventing =
""you constantly rubbish Scancell in their efforts to even raise funds,""
THE TRUTH IS = I ALONE, originally, first pointed-out FUNDING was of VITAL import, and was not only "On the CARDS" but was 'INEVITABLE'
As 'opposed' to the FALSE CLAIM that = "FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here"
.
It is not me the FAILED BUY,BUY,BUY 'GROUP'... who have created LOSSES for SIX, going on SEVEN YEARS...find SO PAINFUL... it IS the REALITY

[inanaco] 01/5/2018 08:38

So Gazza, if the science has not shown to have effect and the results extremely inconclusive yet displayed like some sort of landmark, it should not be discussed ? Because of moral Grounds ? I presume because you are a Shareholder ..

As for IMM lozan, its cancer trial failed. it's current trial is Lupus ...

[gazza] 01/5/2018 08:22

Chelsea, I think the point was a reasonable one: No company that is involved in the fight against cancer deserves to be "rubbished". You may have a personal preference as to which you feel is the "best" and if so, fair enough, put your money there.As you know I have holdings in both SCLP and VAL so I want them both to succeed from both a financial and medical view.I don't feel a need to defend SCLP on another shares bb but I certainly would on the SCLP board.

[chelsea35] 01/5/2018 05:10

Lozan,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

"""WHY, were 'certain trHYPERS' to be found, encroaching on VAL and IMM forums...rubbishing / attacking those companies {in favour of SCLP} who ARE also engaged in 'helping to fight cancer' ???"""""

Rich coming from you Lozan, there are many Scancell holders who would love to ask you "why you constantly rubbish Scancell in their efforts to even raise funds, as IMM have done and VAL do often.

Panama7 would have a field day with the management of VAL now that RG is not CEO of Scancell.

As far as IMM is concerned your use of plurals shows how far you will go to lie to make a point.

If you are talking about numerous SCLP posters who have put right the nonsense and blatant lies which are posted on VAL, covering almost every topic including blatantly mis representing Scancell, then i would have thought you would have supported us in our efforts. Or maybe VAL is your kind of share,

Either way a totally irrelevant post, unfortunately yet another to add to so many more.

[gooosed] 30/4/2018 23:31

BS - thanks for your 15441. Will go back and watch the recording again.