We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.10 | 9.70 | 10.50 | 10.10 | 10.10 | 10.10 | 177,070 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.83 | 93.71M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
04/9/2018 14:12 | Inan, the grown ups here are having a discussion about investment. Not all investments are about "the science". The investment opportunity in VAL recently has been far greater than the opportunity in SCLP (recently). You could have made 7x your investmet had you bought at 1p and sold for 7p. If we follow your dogma, "it is all about the science" it must mean that VAL's science is superior to SCLP as the return has been greater? As for tosh's statement ""I am betting on a potential outcome"" Surely that is what ALL investors do, including everyone here? Are you not confident of a good "outcome" here and hence the reason you are invested? | gazza | |
04/9/2018 14:07 | Dr, you are correct about the delay having nothing to do with the Ichor Gun, that was all sorted 6 months ago. the delay is more likely due to BOD's incompetence in filling in the IND form. | panama7 | |
04/9/2018 13:20 | Gazza, precisely. As has been witnessed quite a few times recently, so called " inferior " science has been bought for large amounts of money. I am betting on a potential event being brought about by the potential of Scancell, even a school kid could understand that concept, unfortunately, our caped crusader is still lacking in the intellectual department, so struggles with such matters. And with maths. And with English. And with business. And with trading. In fact, his lack of understanding in most things is apparent, the list is just too long to write out. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 12:48 | tosh, I would say most investors are (betting on an outcome) The fact is, the results do not have to be spectacular for this to be a financial success. Someone could come along with a wad of money and buy us up, making us a profit regardless of the future success. The "science" only has to improve outcomes in a small % of patients and this could be a commercial success. This is true of many biotechs even those thought to have lessor "science". It's NOT "all about the science" but some can't grasp this point. | gazza | |
04/9/2018 12:25 | Its very simple ;- Whoever buys Scancell ( the company ) will be "investing in the science ", i am merely gambling on a potential outcome, eg ;- someone buying the company or one of its platforms. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 12:17 | SCAMACO - YOU seem to think YOU know what others 'situations / strategies' are....YOU DON'T Maybe YOU should 'take more care' of YOUR own affairs, rather than presume YOU know 'what's best' for others. Or rather, 'What's best for YOU' is nearer the TRUTH. YOU don't have the BALANCE between YOUR limited INTELLIGENCE... and YOUR over-riding ARROGANCE /EGO to be taken seriously, hence YOUR CONtribution to those sitting on trHYPE induced LOSSES. . "can you explain this UNDERSTANDABLE "Alternative View" """""I am betting on a potential outcome , NOT investing in the science.."""".." . YES I, and MANY many others CAN | the real lozan | |
04/9/2018 12:16 | and ineptico bought and holds shares that are so far out of the money that he has to continually try to make himself feel better by trying to justify his MASSIVE errors in judgement.... very unsuccessfully i might add. You would swap places with me and quite a few other posters if you could, but the reality is that you cant, you messed up big time, and you're now paying the price. Just remember, I'm playing with your money, not mine... mine is already reinvested and working elsewhere, yours is funding my free bet, thanks again for that. You're a sucker.... No run along theres a good little chap. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 12:02 | Lozdob can you explain this extraordinary "Alternative View" """""I am betting on a potential outcome , NOT investing in the science.."""" | inanaco | |
04/9/2018 11:54 | any one work out this From Tosh ? """""I am betting on a potential outcome , NOT investing in the science.."""" an Intelligent investment | inanaco | |
04/9/2018 11:49 | ineptico, just once more, and maybe it will finally sink in... I am betting on a potential outcome , NOT investing in the science...it really is a very simple concept, but one that clearly stretches your abilities of comprehension way too far. Such a shame that you are so challenged mentally, but hey, there are " special " homes that can help you if you ask. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 11:23 | Tosh .. does it matter ? what possible gain do you feel you have gained by posting on my investments which you have no idea what the average is ? nothing its just a diversion "fact is, you remain invested because of the science" so does Gazza so does Panama | inanaco | |
04/9/2018 11:16 | This is a gamble using someone elses money, in fact i'm probably using some of yours, so thank you for financing my bet, its appreciated. For every winner, theres a corresponding loser.... guess which one you are ! | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 11:13 | Ineptico, i would rather be in a position of holding a free bet, than holding 600k shares at an average way above the current share price, so im not sure what your point is. As for financial gain, you, of all people are in no position to question anyone elses financial gain ! You dont even know what it means ! And for the record, there has been financial gain, because when i got my initial investment back from trading scancell shares, i re invested it elsewhere, and have achieved a reasonable return eg ;- financial gain . So ineptico, you are not in any position to attempt to discredit, because some of us have ZERO exposure here, and some, like yourself, far from realising any profit what so ever, have managed instead, to rack up massive losses. Now run along, theres a good boy. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 11:03 | tosh, not so free for some of us though! :) | gazza | |
04/9/2018 11:03 | Panama Hattie, Good points re the BOD. Never mind baNANA going on about delays.I CONsider the main reason why the IND has NOT been submitted is due to Fact SCLzp have NOT proved they are FULKzy FUNDE£ to COmplete trial something they need to DO. Until they are Fully FUNded to Complete this work they will delay Co bo trial but nothing to do with Ichyor Tricuspid Gun but with NE3d for MOney. No matter next raise is on cards at 8p and as LNama HTtie says BOD will award more options so skin is hard working investors. It asrtutues know this with freebies Inlike PLUM who gets more RYHype as he gets WTered a lot more | drdobson1 | |
04/9/2018 11:02 | Tosh so that potential stops you realising any profit from your investment here as you have already told us your average is very very low, not quite freebies so basically you have been posting for years with no financial gain to this point indeed you have watched your freebies with an average fall in value over that timescale despite your own predictions of doom and gloom | inanaco | |
04/9/2018 11:01 | wigwammer, yes it would appear that the "alternative" view has become the "general,popular,rea | gazza | |
04/9/2018 10:57 | Its the potential.... simple as that. IF, the potential is realised, then it would have been worth the gamble, but dont be deluded because thats what this is, its a gamble. Fortunately for some of us, its a free bet. | tosh123 | |
04/9/2018 10:42 | panama that is not in dispute, ie you can talk all you like about the BOD we have tried to explain away the delays with ichor and the development of moditope with amplivant but you have ignored those posts .. so no point repeating them but "the Science" clearly in your case is over riding all other considerations would you agree ? | inanaco | |
04/9/2018 10:36 | Panama - your sentiment is certainly a popular one. Nothing alternative about that view either. | wigwammer | |
04/9/2018 10:32 | Like I said the Science looks promising, the fact that I have been here years gives me every right to question the BOD's performance which has been nothing short of a disgrace when you compare it with all the statements, soundbites, presentations, tweets . Totally misleading to the point of being downright lies. Fact their lies have cost a lot of PI's a lot of money especially those who bought after that video in the 30's 40's and 50's. That video is very much a summary of the BOD's total incompetence in taking the Science further. | panama7 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions