Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[drdobson1] 31/8/2018 16:24

At k ast if SCLP stayed afloat it good rely on you being Under the water being the anchor weighing everyone down with your cut and paste CGGSCE qualification for r was it City and zgikds in spelling,gramma and wall building.

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 16:11

Gazza

Cash burn has been explained ...see RNS, as the cash has been raised on that basis what is your problem ?

so the answer can only be NO

if Scancell was using vast amounts of cash to stay afloat instead of investing in the pipeline the answer would be

yes

but that is not the case is it .... ?

[gazza] 31/8/2018 15:37

Simple question:

Are you concerned at all about cash burn?
Yes/No

If no, why not?

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 15:25

I should add "when does that model change"


inanaco31 Aug '18 - 14:52 - 17464 of 17465 Edit
0 1 0
mate your business acumen is zero

for some obscure reason you put the worry of cash burn before the asset created by the cash burn

so you are prepared to sacrifice the asset
to save money ?


for some reason a Business that is in profit cannot burn through cash in R&D ?

can you explain the maths behind that ....

because it affects shareholders funds in both scenarios

1/ shareholder pays for cash burn in R&D when no profits are attributed

2/ shareholder gives up higher dividends from profitable company in exchange for a % of profit further invested in R&D that could generate further profits


in both cases R&D can be classed as "cash Burn"


"""" WHEN YOU WIN A £20m Grant from CRUK.. its called Non Dilutive"""""

[drdobson1] 31/8/2018 15:05

Cash burn has everything to do with Share Oruce whuch means Profit fir ASTuties and Loss for trHYPE hounds.
High cash burn means more CASH and FUNDING at lower Share Price as SCLP dies NIT produce any money.
So Numpty Head to carry out 14 phase 3 tusks (PLUN Msths casting about £500m just to develop the science does that remind everyone baBABA has NI Commercial sense whatsoever or just a BIG EGO to enable him to Cut and Oaste more

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:52

mate your business acumen is zero

for some obscure reason you put the worry of cash burn before the asset created by the cash burn

so you are prepared to sacrifice the asset to save money ?


for some reason a Business that is in profit cannot burn through cash in R&D ?

can you explain the maths behind that ....

because it affects shareholders funds in both scenarios

1/ shareholder pays for cash burn in R&D when no profits are attributed

2/ shareholder gives up higher dividends from profitable company in exchange for a % of profit further invested in R&D that could generate further profits


in both cases R&D can be classed as "cash Burn"

[the real lozan] 31/8/2018 14:51

SCAMACO -
On behalf of *ALL US* "blithering idiots", I would ....like to thank YOU for the 'entertainment' and the 'exhibition' of WHY *WE ALL* and 'markets'... do/ should IGNORE YOUR trHYPE SCAM EGO.
AND
On behalf of *ALL US* "blithering idiots"... would YOU care to TELL US, what the S P is at the moment ???
*ALL US* "blithering idiots"... would understand if this may be too difficult for YOU, as it may involve YOU in posting something of FACT.

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:41

""because cash burn in Scancells case has nothing to do with profit and lose""

If you don't make profit, you burn cash (or assets)
It DOES have everything to do with profit.

If it was "in profit" it wouldn't be burning cash!

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:29

no Gazza

I would not even consider asking the question ....

only a blithering idiot would ....


because cash burn in Scancells case has nothing to do with profit and loss

indeed the majority is Research and development

as such it would still pursue cash burn in that field even if it was in profit ..

you are confusing source ... as you have not understood Scancell at all ... which is a research and development company to a phase 2 asset ...

leaving the commercial phase 3 to end user supply to others ...

thus scancell will continue to consume cash in R &D as it builds out its pipeline

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:20

""why the F.k would you want to reduce cash burn ? in a situation that requires cash burn to get to a inflexion point""

I think all companies strive towards reducing (and ELIMINATING) cash burn at some stage. The alternative is they eventually go bust. (once they have milked the shareholders until there is no milk left)

Now if you "reasoned" the point you would eventually come to this conclusion.

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:14

gazza

these two posts mate are good enough for me To Confirm your a blithering idiot



nanaco31 Aug '18 - 14:01 - 17449 of 17458 Edit
0 0 0
"""Gazza31 Aug '18 - 13:54 - 17442 of 17445
0 0 0
If you want to talk about the science, tell me how Scancells novel approach is going to reduce cash-burn? """

why the F.k would you want to reduce cash burn ? in a situation that requires cash burn to get to a inflexion point

you are commercially naive
inanaco31 Aug '18 - 14:02 - 17450 of 17458 Edit
0 0 0
"""Gazza31 Aug '18 - 13:55 - 17443 of 17449
0 0 0
Or how cytotoxic t cells are going to get the IND submission in on time?"""

now i did say you are a Blithering idiot ...

that post just proves it up

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:11

""No Gazza you have an obsession ... with a Nickname on a BB""
Not true. I always respond to the post not the poster. It's not my fault that a certain poster posts garbage. I wonder if that has a name, medically?

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:10

namely that your worry Gazza about the rent is maybe not so important after all

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:09

I think the accountant in lozan has just drawn a conclusion from the accounts presented

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:07

No Gazza you have an obsession ... with a Nickname on a BB

medically that has a name

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:05

No Inanaco, I don't have a share in you thankfully!

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:04

any way

Gazza is attacking his own share again ....... PMSL


have a good day folks

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:03

So it's NOT all about the science then!
Finally you admit it. lol

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:02

"""Gazza31 Aug '18 - 13:55 - 17443 of 17449
0 0 0
Or how cytotoxic t cells are going to get the IND submission in on time?"""

now i did say you are a Blithering idiot ...

that post just proves it up

[inanaco] 31/8/2018 14:01

"""Gazza31 Aug '18 - 13:54 - 17442 of 17445
0 0 0
If you want to talk about the science, tell me how Scancells novel approach is going to reduce cash-burn? """

why the F.k would you want to reduce cash burn ? in a situation that requires cash burn to get to a inflexion point

you are commercially naive

[gazza] 31/8/2018 14:00

Definition:

Blithering Idiot -

anyone who destroys Inan in an argument

Proud to be called a "bithering Idiot" !

[wanderer1210_0] 31/8/2018 13:59

Scancell and on time are two different entities, the only thing they manage to call on time is further dilution. It's still a baby bio after years and years of being pumped by certain individuals, woof woof

[gazza] 31/8/2018 13:58

or how about a comparison of SCLP's science vs every other immuno-oncology company in the world?