Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 15:04

you have lost me .... why would that influence Scancell ?

Tantrum ??? lost me again .

[chelsea35] 15/9/2017 14:47

Inanaco, well you have sunk even further today. Didn"t think it was possible, from one tantrum into another with Ivy. Pathetic. Was it the Bavarian Nordic news that you were trying to divert from?

hxxps://endpts.com/kerrisdale-2-0-this-week-bavarian-nordic-cancer-vaccine-is-a-bust-in-phiii/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Friday%20September%2015%202017&utm_content=Friday%20September%2015%202017+CID_3ce8bd35a974e4526740de3c4ea8cec5&utm_source=ENDPOINTS%20emails&utm_term=Kerrisdale%202-0%20this%20week%20Bavarian%20Nordics%20cancer%20vaccine%20is%20a%20bust%20in%20PhIII

[the real lozan] 15/9/2017 14:08

What "argument" RRRs ???
There is NO "argument"
Just YOU 'foot stamping' AGAIN
"More damaged water services 'ON THE CARDS TODAY' "

[gooosed] 15/9/2017 14:08

As it's a vaccine, I guess it's relevant & is Plieth having a pop at Jefferies ?

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 14:01

Lord haw haw try's to deflect .. what clearly is a major flaw in his argument ...

[tosh123] 15/9/2017 13:54

Just ignore the idiot.... hopefully he will go away... permanently.
He adds nothing here.

[the real lozan] 15/9/2017 13:34

Gash - Some will not 'miss' the 'intent' of.... "No, I am not defending YOU "
.
May I refer- in part - folks to a post I made on this subject
the real lozan - 24 Aug 2017 -
.
der TEA LEAF -DEMANDS = "Loz ... declare your own trades."
.
Many, who know me of old will verify/ know, I do not hold with posters 'declaring their holdings' OR ANYONE DEMANDING anyone should.
A = Investments are a PRIVATE matter.. and each investor is 'His own 'safety officer'' B = The temptation is for 'certain' posters to CLAIM they own xxxmilion of this or 2x xxxmillion of that, without any proof...
C = 'Certain' posters think this or that person MUST know better than anyone else IF he / she holds THAT MANY.... THis - as *WE* know is NOT the case.
C = Invariably, those same 'certain' posters make the FALSE CLAIM that "I know more than him/ her COS I hold 3 more shares than him/her"
d = I don't care how many shares someone else holds = cos those are NOT my shares
BUT
I treat everyone as EQUALs - irrespecive of share holding size.
.
Finally, I shall / do "declare my own trades" with Mrs. Lozan... normally as we enjoy a drinkypoo post BBQ - out on one of our terraces

[tosh123] 15/9/2017 13:34

Gazza....ignore the idiot.

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 13:29

it does say Your Post ... ie Roses or have i missed something ???

i have listened, and asked you to explain politely your position, indeed indicating i am Thick on this matter.......
so here we are again ...eh ! Your Post .... which is why i question things, good job, because they rarely answer

SCLPRE: Inanaco/Jeremy1 Sep '17
Not sure why you would think I had any issue with the trials, although they have had their fair share of delays. my point in this whole conversation is more to do with your attitude towards other posters.

You have a tendency to take a one track approach to everyone and everything. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you could benefit greatly from learning to at least take 3 seconds to try and listen to someone elses perspective, whether it is right or wrong instead of dismissing it out of hand automatically..

[gazza] 15/9/2017 13:26

Inan, if it makes you feel better, I have the same trouble reading Lozan's posts for the opposite reason.

[drdobson] 15/9/2017 13:25

NANA

The post was UNDER YOUR name.No matter I bet IT WAS aimed at you.

Comedy Gold

[gazza] 15/9/2017 13:25

Inanaco, your 11714.
Sorry but I have to back up drd on this. You quote multiple people in the same post as well as interstitially putting in your own words. There is no indication as to who said what such as "you said", "he said" or just using double quotes (a single pair is sufficient for most people), something I'm afraid you lack in the majority of your posts. Who knows, you may rarely have something interesting to say but trying to make out what you say amongst the poor spelling, grammar and punctuation makes the task ardous.

[gazza] 15/9/2017 13:20

Inanaco, you ask:

"or are you back defending idiots again ..."

No, I'm not defending you I am asking why you presume to say who holds what when clearly no have no idea.

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 13:11

Herbie

that's roses Post ... not mine Thicko can't you read ????

You have a tendency to take a one track approach to everyone and everything. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you could benefit greatly from learning to at least take 3 seconds to try and listen to someone elses perspective, whether it is right or wrong instead of dismissing it out of hand automatically..

[inanaco] 15/9/2017 13:09

terror told us he held a few, maybe sold by now, but that is up to him and you have as well ....

if he has shares he is a complete hypocrite for one .. or are you back defending idiots again ...

[drdobson] 15/9/2017 13:07

Tosh/Loz Thanks for supportive words yesterday

NANA asks on the other place AM I THICK and states the following

You have a tendency to take a one track approach to everyone and everything. I'm not saying you are wrong, but you could benefit greatly from learning to at least take 3 seconds to try and listen to someone elses perspective, whether it is right or wrong instead of dismissing it out of hand automatically..

YES YOU are THICK if you DO NOT understand the irony of what YOU have posted

YOU fall out with EVEYBODY and are obessive about arguing and always seem interested in other people's positions rather than your own.

No one likes no.No one respects or listens to you and I have a BIG drcision to make.

At the end of my free trial do I take my little pot of money elsewhere or do I spend some as the fun I get out of seeing NANA getting a verbal bating is pure Comedy Gold

[gazza] 15/9/2017 12:59

Inanaco, why are you so obsessed about who holds shares and how many?
It is fairly obvious that the majority of posters here have an "interest" in the share, that is are current holders, are not currently holders but looking to buy in/buy back in.

I don't recall the target(s) of your obsession ever saying that they DON'T hold shares. Perhaps this is what they WANT you to believe but are far too moral to say they don't as that would be a blatant LIE.

The only person who seems to talk about who does and doesn't hold is YOU!

[terror] 15/9/2017 10:42

Nana - You don't need to be a Scancell shareholder to attend the AGM.

Just walk right in.

[oldnotwise] 14/9/2017 16:59

Bermuda..
Your 11674... Five WHOLE minutes before any response?
Like it LOL
ATB

[inanaco] 14/9/2017 16:33

crypto-babble ............ maybe you should answer

Do u hold scancell shares