ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

SCLP Scancell Holdings Plc

9.15
0.05 (0.55%)
03 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Scancell Holdings Plc LSE:SCLP London Ordinary Share GB00B63D3314 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.05 0.55% 9.15 8.80 9.50 9.15 8.86 9.10 1,054,095 12:15:26
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 5.27M -11.94M -0.0129 -7.09 84.9M
Scancell Holdings Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SCLP. The last closing price for Scancell was 9.10p. Over the last year, Scancell shares have traded in a share price range of 7.65p to 18.125p.

Scancell currently has 927,819,977 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Scancell is £84.90 million. Scancell has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -7.09.

Scancell Share Discussion Threads

Showing 11576 to 11597 of 66425 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  473  472  471  470  469  468  467  466  465  464  463  462  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
13/9/2017
14:26
11605 Possibly, if I understood your crypto-hieroglyph-speak.
What does an equals sign after a word mean? You seem to use it a lot.

gazza
13/9/2017
14:21
Gash Re your 11602 -
To sum-up, you mean =
FUNDING ???
o/-

the real lozan
13/9/2017
14:20
Gazza

so you are Buying and holding ... no problem

inanaco
13/9/2017
14:19
Inanaco,

You said:

"Gazza, its a great share, i don't see any issue with buy and hold so from that perspective we agree."

Please do not attribute me with things I have never said. I have NEVER advocated BUY and HOLD policy. I only said I bought this morning I never said I would hold. If they hit 20p next week I may sell. (I do have a core holding as well)

gazza
13/9/2017
14:15
FUNDING

Lots of nonsense being posted on funding it IS an issue, it's not an issue etc.

Ignore where you are coming from and try and think logically -

Is funding an issue? Yes it is, it hasn't been arranged so is still an issue.
Is it a BIG issue? Yes it is, since without funding the company cannot move forward.

Is it insurmountable? No. There are many funding options available with a wide range of financial implications. The money required is very small in the grand scheme of things, pocket money for a lot of rich individuals.

Given that the placing was oversold, it is probable that a similar placing could raise the same again. Please go and do the maths. Work out the impact on your investment if Scancell raised £20M by issuing 250M shares at 8p. The shares would be worth over 11p. You could by a few weeks ago at 10p and this morning for 12.66.

The devaluation of you CURRENT investment would be small. The big impact would be on potential gains so you only get £1.50 instead of £3.00 or whatever it turns out to be.

gazza
13/9/2017
14:12
Gazza
99.9% of posters agree that someone has lost the plot.

tosh123
13/9/2017
14:06
So your not Ruckrover ... ?
inanaco
13/9/2017
14:05
Inanaco - 11596

Sorry, you've lost the plot I not getting into this.

gazza
13/9/2017
14:04
Gazza, its a great share, i don't see any issue with buy and hold so from that perspective we agree. But Lord Haw Haw looking out trough "the big window" to view his estate .. has no view at all
inanaco
13/9/2017
14:01
Inanaco - 11593

"Just point out Loz, 99.9% of shareholders have not sold today"

Perhaps, who knows. I actually bought today. I posted earlier on LSE that I thought the share price fall was overdone and I thought it would be back level by close of play (or at least the end of the week) The problem was I couldn't get enough at sub 13p that I wanted. Never mind.

gazza
13/9/2017
14:00
SCLPRE: Association??Sun 15:58
Inanaco,
You said:
"You should address your concerns to Lindy on the most efficient method"

At no point have I expressed any sort of concern on this topic. I merely sort clarification on your comments

"It the most efficient way to deliver Modi1 " and later " most efficient method for sure"

I wanted to find out on what these statements re based, is it something Scancell have said or just your opinion?

are you saying now your not Ruckrover .. ???

inanaco
13/9/2017
13:59
Loz,
remember that 99.9% of people agreed with your post.

tosh123
13/9/2017
13:58
Gazza, hence you had "efficient" re-classified form "Novel" to factual ... LoL

I won't draw a conclusion from 1/5 ... might draw us into IQ tests again

inanaco
13/9/2017
13:57
Inanaco - 11572

It's not clear which bits of your post are your words or from the RNS or are you speaking for Scancell these days?

You said:
"Gazza i guess Scancell has now used the words "efficient" "

Have they? What has that got to do with me?

gazza
13/9/2017
13:54
Loz, BTW I was one of the 5 ;)
gazza
13/9/2017
13:54
Lozan - your 11566

You make the point that people should deduce what you mean when you just post the word "FUNDING" in caps. Therein lays the problem. Without other words (nouns, verbs,conjunctives etc) no meaning, opinion or thought is conveyed. The cynical might think that having put just a word with no opinion expressed you can later say it meant whatever with hindsight you meant it to. For example, had an RNS been issued to say funding had been achieved through a licencing agreement you could claim that's what you were alluding to. You may attain a little more credibility by making predictions BEFORE they happen. ATB

gazza
13/9/2017
13:48
Lord Haw Haw ... beaten by his own propaganda
inanaco
13/9/2017
13:44
Ironic ... poor old loz .. accepts the "fool" as a Peer Revue ...

sorry C7 .. but you can see the funny side of this ...

inanaco
13/9/2017
13:32
Dear Loz
Maybe as your thick i better explain that ..

The man you have chastised for 4 years as being a Fool, has now "Rec" your post, and you have just Gloated about it ..

Kind Regards
Ironic

inanaco
13/9/2017
13:28
No idea Loz, but you got a Rec from C7 ...
inanaco
13/9/2017
13:26
jut remind you Of Herbie's post ..

It was an INTERIM raise so SURELY MORE is needed to do ALL the trials.
Yes OVER subscribed BUT as has been pointed out by ASTUTE many of these institutions will simply FLIP there shares making a NICE profit.

That is why it went DOWN to 10p due to SELLER and everyone ELSE in CITY knew about the PLACING except for NANA.

That is why ASTUTE BUY at 10p and sell,at 16p and WAIT for next PLACING at 7p and laugh at NANA losing lots of money.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Helium had been in Scancell approx 7 years
2. We also knew about a potential placing we voted for it
3. He has no shares. Expecting 7p buy next time.

well if that's the best the astute can post ..

apart from Window size, ... says it all

inanaco
13/9/2017
13:05
Loz,
just to point out ( not that you need any help in understanding ) that " 99.9% of shareholders have not sold today " , is UTTER UNEDUCATED nonsense.
No one can say what "percentage of shareholders have sold out today "... what an absolutely ridiculous statement to make... what an IDIOT and a LIAR.

Right.... back, to ignoring the plank again now.

what an idiot hahaha... honestly, he just digs himself deeper and deeper into a hole.

tosh123
Chat Pages: Latest  473  472  471  470  469  468  467  466  465  464  463  462  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock