We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sabre Insurance Group Plc | LSE:SBRE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWVDP49 | ORD GBP0.001P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.40 | -0.90% | 154.60 | 154.00 | 155.00 | 157.80 | 150.00 | 157.80 | 5,372,438 | 16:35:17 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance Carriers, Nec | 59.09M | 18.07M | 0.0723 | 21.44 | 387.5M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/3/2021 09:59 | Just for clarity - I am all in favour of CEOs using the tools at their disposal to smooth profit. It has always happened but I have never before seen it on the scale of this year! The only thing which has surprised me this morning is that Sabre chose to pitch its COR at 75% rather than closer to the 2019 COR. He may be nervous about 2021 GWP recovery and earned rating strength this year(much from business written in 2020) will be weaker. The question is how much of the weaker earning rates will be compensated by the 3rd lockdown. As for the wider industry pattern; it seems, reasonably enough, that CEOs want to ensure they are not seen to profit from the pandemic. I am only wondering about their lack of subtlety in fixing results. | wba1 | |
16/3/2021 09:46 | wba - thank you for that analysis. It is, I suspect, the kind of thing an experienced insurance specialist would instinctively look for. But if they are using canny manipulation, it isn't to flatter the COR! | jonwig | |
16/3/2021 09:45 | @wba1 - Your post #90. Excellent analysis. Thanks for sharing. Much appreciated. | speedsgh | |
16/3/2021 09:25 | I am getting a bit tired of insurer CEOs being so transparent in their results manipulation. An 11.6% reduction in current year loss ratio but accompanied by a reduction in prior year release from 11% to under 3%? Rampant reserve manipulation exactly as seen in the Aviva, Zurich and DLG results. The explanation for the prior year releases is rubbish. PPOs are a very small element of prior year reserves and even less conservative companies set case reserves at best estimate plus 5%, meaning releases of (on average) 5% on settlement. Other points; * circa £1m of premium refunds has moved from negative technical income to a reduction in premiums - so the real GWP is about that much higher if compared to 2019 * the comment on DAC (effectively amortisation of acquisition costs) and which reduced profit declared compared to 2019 is interesting. DAC manipulation is, together with reserves, a traditional CEO technique for ending up with the profit they want to publish. * the comment about levies increasing is fair but incomplete. Levies are charged against premium on a lag basis (past years premium) so, when premium resumes growth levies will be shown as decreasing (good news for the future). * the change in unearned premium reserve (over £12m) looks surprising, especially in a year of falling GWP. This figure should be a simple calculation and it may be driven by distorted new business paterns during the year but .... * the claims triangles at 3.14.1 are especially interesting. The very low prior year releases are especially driven by very low releases for 2019 accident year (compared to similar releases - such as for 2018 in the 2019 results). This is especially odd, unless CEO manipulation, as most of the large claims for that year will not have developed near to settlement. My guess is that the real result is nearer 70% than 75% COR. I have topped up at 234. | wba1 | |
16/3/2021 08:19 | Is the market surprised at lower profits? Surely not, but maybe they've missed expectations, which can't be reliable anyway in this situation. | jonwig | |
16/3/2021 08:02 | maybe not! WTFDIK? | jonnybig | |
16/3/2021 07:56 | Hoping for a significant tick up here | jonnybig | |
16/3/2021 07:24 | Final results: Quite satisfactory, I think. Zoom call at 8:30. | jonwig | |
13/3/2021 10:39 | No. I think so to. | petewy | |
13/3/2021 10:04 | Am I the only one who thinks this price is on the low side?. Maybe after Tuesday it will receive a boost. | father jack1 | |
12/3/2021 11:12 | Notice of Results - Sabre Insurance Group plc, one of the UK's leading private motor insurance underwriters, announced on 23 February 2021 that it will release its full year results for the period ending 31 December 2020 on 16 March 2021. A virtual presentation will be held at 8:30am on the day. Please note the change of time from 9:30am to 8:30am. Please contact sabre@tulchangroup.c | speedsgh | |
23/2/2021 11:09 | Notice of Results - Sabre Insurance Group plc, one of the UK's leading private motor insurance underwriters, will announce its full year results for the year ended 31 December 2020 on 16 March 2021. A virtual presentation will be held at 9:30am on the day. Please contact sabre@tulchangroup.c | speedsgh | |
09/2/2021 09:57 | You can go wrong with Sabre if they target significant growth. As any underwriter will tell you, new business comes at a 5-10% (minimum) loss ratio penalty compared to renewal business. I was surprised that this did not happen with Snowball around (who used to declare Christmas sales when running Aviva GI, if he thought he was going to miss volume targets. But at least he is now gone. Do not get me wrong. Sabre are the quality play in this sector, but have taken this position by a clear focus on underwriting quality. If they compromise this for growth the risk increases materially. I do not expect this, currently hold (but for range trading) and expect March results (and next years) to be excellent (albeit I expect them to restrict the declared profit by stashing surplus reserves for a rainy day). | wba1 | |
12/1/2021 19:47 | Can't go wrong with Sbre. Especially as people aren't driving in the lockdown | wish i wasnt in rbs | |
11/1/2021 22:30 | Sabre ahead of the pack, says Peel Hunt - https://citywire.co. | speedsgh | |
08/1/2021 12:45 | Kayne Anderson Rudnick have increased again, to 8.01%. | jonwig | |
03/12/2020 09:10 | The explanation for the mid-November spike has become apparent. Kayne Anderson Rudnick increased their shareholding from 6% to 7.5%, so it was the filling of a large buy order. The interesting question is about their intentions. They are not known as an activist investor, but 7.5% is a fairly large holding. | wba1 | |
23/11/2020 13:17 | Very similar to CSN the way this behaves with its random spikes and dips. Just look at that chart - a beauty for trading. | thebutler | |
17/11/2020 14:37 | Just my opinion speedsgh. The important thing is less the timing of specials than that Sabre will pay them when they can. I am a bit surprised at the rise today, but I never did figure out what caused it to spike to 310 in late summer and could not believe it when it fell back to the 220s. | wba1 | |
17/11/2020 14:06 | Happy to defer to your greater experience, wba1. Either way would be a satisfactory outcome imo. I do not currently hold. Kicking myself that I didn't start looking more closely at SBRE until the last few days. But am happy to wait for a future opportunity to build a position at a slightly lower price. | speedsgh | |
17/11/2020 13:55 | I will be surprised if there is another special dividend with the 2020 final. Much more likely to look to having a progressive final dividend (ie an increase on 8.1 to, say, 8.5p. Given the recent special and the liking of the market for progressive dividend records an increase in the final would be good PR. I am also thinking that they have a little less room than last year with September 2019 solvency ratio at 186% (still excellent) compared to 198% at the same point in 2019. Of course, they have been stuffing reserves to the gunwales so have hidden leeway from reserve releases. | wba1 | |
17/11/2020 10:36 | Going by their comments in the Interim Results and Oct trading update, I would anticipate another return of surplus capital (via special dividend) alongside payment of the FY20 final dividend in May 21. FY18 core dividend 14.00p (interim 7.20p, final 6.80p); special 6.00p = FY18 total 20.00p FY19 core dividend 12.80p (interim 4.70p, final 8.10p); special 5.20p (declared, then postponed, then reinstated alongside FY20 interim payment) = FY19 total 'declared' 18.00p FY20 interim 4.30p... | speedsgh | |
16/11/2020 19:35 | GaryCook; if you take all the dividends paid in 2020 the yield has been 6.7%, but of the 17.6p, 5.2p was a special and so not to be expected every year (they paid one in 2018 but not 2019). So the predictable yield is 4.9% but with the added possibility of special dividends. | wba1 | |
16/11/2020 16:12 | Up the Villa. Jim O'Neil supports Man U | petewy | |
16/11/2020 16:11 | wba1,So the Dividend,s paid in 2020 so far of 17.6p,gives SBRE a dividend yield of 6.71% at 262p correct ? | garycook |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions