ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

RKH Rockhopper Exploration Plc

21.50
0.20 (0.94%)
16 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Rockhopper Exploration Plc LSE:RKH London Ordinary Share GB00B0FVQX23 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.20 0.94% 21.50 21.50 21.80 22.00 21.10 21.50 2,280,276 16:35:13
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 0 -4.55M -0.0073 -29.86 132.11M
Rockhopper Exploration Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker RKH. The last closing price for Rockhopper Exploration was 21.30p. Over the last year, Rockhopper Exploration shares have traded in a share price range of 10.00p to 22.00p.

Rockhopper Exploration currently has 620,229,436 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Rockhopper Exploration is £132.11 million. Rockhopper Exploration has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -29.86.

Rockhopper Exploration Share Discussion Threads

Showing 114076 to 114095 of 115875 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  4575  4574  4573  4572  4571  4570  4569  4568  4567  4566  4565  4564  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
29/8/2024
20:11
Sounds a rather sensible chap ??CJ1986Posted in: RKHPosts: 63Price: 13.50No OpinionAnother day closer...7 Aug 2023 12:09Well here we go again...Another day, one day closer to the inevitability of exhausted funds, nothing left in the coffers to pay all those handsome salaries, and the inevitable capital raise and share dilution that follows while we wait for news of... well... anything... Sam Moody's latest fart in the office RNS... I wonder if he's had that lovely marble flooring finished in the hallway of his 5th house yet? Could be an RNS about that coming... imminently...Don't worry though about a capital raise. Nothing to see here. It won't have any effect on any of the following:CEOs and execs salaries (got to keep those salaries going)Institutions (who have so much money share dilution has zero effect, especially when they grab the required % of new shares and negate any effect of the dilution)Postman Pat (nothing effects him, he's always happy)Rockhopper Penguins (these cute little guys will be rather indifferent to another capital raise making 15p equivalent to 9p, as long as they can still hunt the required quota of fish)But yeah I guess the only ones affected by another round of dilution will be... ooooh... now... let me think. No. It couldn't possibly be PI's like us... surely not? We won't get screwed over again.Don't get offended anyone, no I'm not a paid deranged deramper. No. I'm not from a rival O&G company. Yes I am invested and this company is very efficient at making even those of us with the most rose tinted spectacles a teeny tiny bit sceptical.Looking forward to the £1+ party, but not holding my breath. If it gets there, then I'll buy Sam a new hair clip and apologise profusely for ever, ever doubting him."The barman is getting ready" all IMHO DYOR BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
gozzie2
29/8/2024
20:04
MmmmTook him 3 months to write that?Wonder where he got the idea lol?- SEA LION FIDAs promised the decision, FID, on the heavily anticipated Sea Lion project has now been brought forward to 2096 from the previously agreed date of 2117. This is due to many factors including, the eventual release of the hostage sheep ? near Goose Green, and that another 12 bottles of the finest Chardonnay are delivered for the Port Stanley barman and his dog. Promptly.
gozzie2
29/8/2024
16:03
I ONLY drink Bitter - as if you didn't all know LoL
gozzei2
29/8/2024
15:58
Great info from muggins the mogger on lse ?GOZZIE2 downs pints now while he does the "work"?That's over for GOZZIE2 as he started buying from 6p?Unlike the m0ggers lol ??FACT
gozzie2
29/8/2024
15:15
Tizo100. Lets see.
brazilnut1
29/8/2024
13:42
I'm in Atherton ?Wheatsheaf ?Fancy a pint and surgery ??
gozzie2
29/8/2024
12:46
keep taking the tablets ya nut job lol
tizo100
29/8/2024
11:45
Eh?? that lse banter has improved the RKH shareprice the last 10 years lol ?Anyway boozing in Atherton ?Get some "work" done ??
gozzie2
29/8/2024
10:54
Sounds plausible
gozzie2
29/8/2024
10:50
Some smashing discussions, great content and top banter on'ere. Them Grammer boys must be kicking them sen the day they booted me rsrse out the backdoor over in LSE. FACT
gozzei2
28/8/2024
20:52
So eventually Navitas will definitely bring in another partner ?DictionaryDefinitions from Oxford Languages · phrase of sooner than later at some future time; eventually.Shame they don't use the Oxford dictionary and use Ben-Yehuda DictionaryCharlton Heston played him well ?
gozzie2
28/8/2024
20:46
Strange phrase to put into a report ?Sooner or later ??Sooner than what or later than what ??A bit like RKH shares ?They will come good sooner in 2026, or later in 2056 ??Cheers ?
gozzie2
28/8/2024
20:43
Gozzie 88 pence actual trade .

Gozzie 6 pence hindsight trade only .

Dad , nothing to do with it , a pathetic excuse for a bad decision Gozzie2 made .

These are the facts you will never escape .

copypasteowl
28/8/2024
19:34
People talking b0ll0x on lse ?Making things up ??Nothing new there then lol ??
gozzie2
28/8/2024
16:36
Hardest "work " I've done all day posting factual information, instead of GUESSING sh1te ,apart from downing 4 pints,washing 2 pots and turning on the remote ??Get back to "work"?Cheers
gozzie2
28/8/2024
15:03
My "work" is cutting and pasting from LSE: it's a schit3 job, but some low IQ Berkshire Hunt gotta do it LoL.

All the best

gozzei2
28/8/2024
14:16
Get back to "work" ??
gozzie2
28/8/2024
13:58
Cut and paste courtesy of Moggy on LSE - you the Guvnor chum. FACT
gozzei2
28/8/2024
13:40
On August thirteenth, the period for interested parties to submit their opinions, proposals, consultations, regarding the Environmental Impact Statement, EIS, presented by the Israeli/American oil company Navitas Petroleum, which is scheduled to drill more than twenty wells in the Sea Lion field, in waters north of the Falkland Islands with a view to extracting crude oil, ended.The EIS featured Sea Lion Development Phase 1 and Phase 2 reports, which were made public and distributed to stakeholders, and as of 13 this month, 25 responses had been submitted by individuals, businesses and other organisations alongside submissions made by the Islands' own Government Departments.The 25 responses have been shared with the oil company itself, which has 28 days from August 13, to review them and submit them to the Executive Council of the Islands, after which they will also be made public.In the midst of the atmosphere of enthusiasm that the launch of the oil industry has generated among many in the Islands, as in the rest of the world, there are voices that do not agree in their entirety, particularly with regard to some technical, environmental and social aspects. These include a report by Falklands Conservation, a not-for-profit scientific organisation specialising in the defence and conservation of the environment, and other social and economic observations by the Secretary of the Falkland Islands Employees' Union, Emma Brook.In the first case, the speaker is Andy Stanworth, Conservation Manager of Falklands Conservation, who said that "as an organization we cannot support the EIS proposal, something that should not surprise anyone: we are an environmental organization with a vision of an environment that works well, with several decades of research that show that emissions are the generators of the climate change that we suffer globally. Climate change is one of the most significant, if not the most significant, elements of having impacts on wildlife, the environment and humanity in general.""International agencies tell us that if we want to stay within the boundaries of wildlife and humanity, we must not extract more oil from the ground, and if we want a successful energy transition, we must approach it from the point of view of supply, rather than demand. And we have positioned ourselves at that point to be part of the debate so that decisions can be made in full view of the potential consequences, but I reiterate we are not the ones who make the decisions.""That is therefore our position on the Proposal, but I want to separate that from our comments, environmental comments because they have been made regardless of our position, referring to environmental impacts in a whole range of aspects. We make an assessment as to whether we think it is appropriate to make a decision on the proposal, with what it contains, and obviously it is based on the scale and meaning of the proposal, which in this case is a very broad and significant proposal with high risks. In what we have seen there is no purpose, no best practice or principles are followed, and there are also several corner cuts that result in unnecessary impacts on the Falklands' environment."Some of the key issues that we have said do not fit the purpose are first of all two, and they are very out of focus and time. To begin with, the one referring to the data on seabirds, according to our point of view there is no impact of evaluation of those impacts. The existing data is from twenty years ago, nor is it appropriate, since it was not collected for that purpose and does not cover important areas of risk, and therefore we are concerned about those who think of using information from twenty years ago to make key decisions."The other issue is that there is no commitment to contain/offset emissions that will obviously be significant for the development of the field and again it is very concerning and contrary to good practice, and we would like to see, share, comments referring to those offsets in the EIS."Let us say as an additional fact that the written and documented response to the public consultation of EIS, by Falklands Conservation, is voluminous, and that to carry out the EIS, Navitas requested and contracted the collaboration of the other centre for environmental scientific studies in the Falklands, SAERI, which are not necessarily competitive.As for the social and economic impacts of oil development in the Islands, the issue was addressed by Emma Brook, secretary of the Falkland Islands Employees' Union, who alleges that some of these consequences have already begun to be seen, and that she hopes they will be duly addressed. As in any global scenario in which a strong investment will have consequences for the locality and community, Ms Brook refers to housing and rents.In this regard, Ms Brook affirms that there are owners who are retaining their properties in anticipation of the arrival of the high rents that the presence of oil well-paid will mean for the local housing market, which is already in deficit. It can also be affirmed with the acquisition of land and homes that their values have increased."Unfortunately, we lack an independent entity to ensure that housing and rental values remain within the reach of residents. It would seem that the elected legislators have deprioritized the issue fearful of not offending investors and the general progress of the Islands. But as a result we should not be surprised if young couples choose to leave the Islands due to lack of reasonable access to housing."Likewise, regarding the lots of land with services, "the government of the Islands should establish a registry where young couples can be registered and at fixed prices, without speculation. With the arrival of the oil industry, it is estimated that there will be a need for about forty homes to house them, in addition to their families, which will mean another 160 people in the community with extreme public health and education services. (Stanley, the capital, has a population of about 3,100 people)However, Ms Brooks says the Falklands has a long tradition of making things go smoothly, but it is essential that the oil industry prioritises local people over short-term financial gains. "We hope that the oil industry will contribute some of the profits by helping to provide affordable housing for young people and complying with environmental standards. In this way, the benefits of development can be distributed more equitably rather than concentrated in the hands of large landowners."
gozzie2
28/8/2024
12:28
Ye I hope BOR goes under like Argos. Gets rid of another hanger on. What nationality is market dealer falklandi ? Is it freakish from freakland. Wherever its from it is a freaky individual. Agree Sharon ?
brazilnut1
Chat Pages: Latest  4575  4574  4573  4572  4571  4570  4569  4568  4567  4566  4565  4564  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock