ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

RKH Rockhopper Exploration Plc

40.10
0.50 (1.26%)
20 Jan 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Rockhopper Exploration Plc LSE:RKH London Ordinary Share GB00B0FVQX23 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.50 1.26% 40.10 40.00 40.50 42.00 39.50 40.50 9,764,094 16:35:27
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 0 -4.55M -0.0073 -55.48 245.61M
Rockhopper Exploration Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker RKH. The last closing price for Rockhopper Exploration was 39.60p. Over the last year, Rockhopper Exploration shares have traded in a share price range of 10.30p to 42.00p.

Rockhopper Exploration currently has 620,229,436 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Rockhopper Exploration is £245.61 million. Rockhopper Exploration has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -55.48.

Rockhopper Exploration Share Discussion Threads

Showing 113851 to 113863 of 116575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  4555  4554  4553  4552  4551  4550  4549  4548  4547  4546  4545  4544  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/8/2024
08:49
Buffit. Can you explain how I’ve been outed on LSE??
I don’t think I have ever posted on the majority of forums that are listed. Bigred 7 and 10 are the only names I have.
As for getting paid to post you are definitely wrong.
I suppose you are a flat earth man too?
And just for the record Gozzei2 shot JFK.

bigred10
11/8/2024
07:16
He also forecast oil would be 125 dollars in 2024??Unfortunately 99.9 percent on these boards will be in an urn on a mantelpiece??OscarIndiaLimaPosts: 189Price: 13.65Strong BuyRE: 20 p on fidToday 03:45OM or FID do not increase traded volumes. Price means nothing.Wait for the great energy crisis. Read what Mike Rothman writes.Patience
gozzie2
11/8/2024
07:02
What about Mmmmonday ?Don't you like them ??
gozzie2
10/8/2024
15:57
I did warn them 5 years ago ??AiminvestorsPosts: 89Price: 13.65No Opinion20 p on fidToday 14:34If we get to 20 p on fid I'll be pleased (given where we are now and reality setting in for me). If people aren't interested in oil companies any more then there isn't much they can do. All this talk of one pound plus is pie in the sky
gozzie2
10/8/2024
15:56
Soon be Xmas lol ???Silverfoil13Posts: 1,701Price: 13.65No OpinionRE: Delisting.Today 14:20So long as I get £1 at least from Navitas for a takeover I might take it to at least double my original investment (14 years ago) but would prefer £4
gozzie2
10/8/2024
07:20
LolToo much fun ?OscarIndiaLimaPosts: 188Price: 13.65Strong BuyRE: GoddersToday 05:16Only a plank would pay another plank to "discourage buying" when, in the first place, nobody is buying anyway.Patience
gozzie2
10/8/2024
07:06
No way anyone is paying Tongo ?Shirley??Good grief ??This is for the attention of the hedge funding paying him from Acas ?In most circumstances an employer has the right to claim back money if they've overpaid someone. They should contact the employee as soon as they're aware of the mistake.If an employee notices an overpayment in their payslip, they should talk to their employer as soon as possibleIn most circumstances an employer has the right to claim back money if they've overpaid someone. They should contact the employee as soon as they're aware of the mistake.If an employee notices an overpayment in their payslip, they should talk to their employer as soon as possible
gozzie2
09/8/2024
18:24
WILL ROCKHOPPER STILL BE AROUND FIVE YEARS FROM NOW ???
=======================================================

Given the fact that the UK Government and the Opposition parties want the UK to move away from being reliant on fossil fuels and it wants the focus to be on renewable sources of energy, then the future for Rockhopper Exploration PLC looks especially bleak.

sellhighandbuylow
09/8/2024
15:51
H&W ? Blind leading the blind there. Milking UK for years. Let them go under then cut Northern Ireland loose from the UK. Dont want them dont need em. Just a drain on UK.
brazilnut1
09/8/2024
15:48
Bigred10 outed on LSE.
buffit1
09/8/2024
13:20
Wow Mr Cart still reading this rubbish lol ??AusonPosts: 7,051Price: 13.60No OpinionRE: GoddersToday 10:38From another investment site I read this morning regarding RKH posters
gozzie2
09/8/2024
10:10
They have found someone else for the port ?The Falkland Islands Government is already in negotiations with KML Ltd, a marine works contractor based in the United Kingdom, to take over the recently finalised contract with Harland and Wolff of Belfast for the Islands' commercial port replacement project. The legislator-elect with responsibility for Commercial Services, MLA Mark Pollard commented to the weekly Penguin News that the company "has been involved in this type of development for a long time, but at the moment I can't tell you much more about the matter..."Regarding the issue with Harland & Wolff, it was announced that after a detailed review process, the Government of the Islands has decided to finalize further progress in contract negotiations with the company because, "despite productive negotiations, the Government of the Islands and Harland & Woff were unable to achieve a mutually acceptable commercial position."MLA Pollard admitted that it was not an easy decision because "essentially they are struggling and there are jobs at risk, there are people at risk and we wanted to give them every possible opportunity for financial certainty, but in the end we didn't succeed and we also have to think about the people of the Falklands and the project that is so important for the Falklands."MLA Pollard was asked if the outcome was linked to the fact that the company was unable to get the backing of the new Labour government in the United Kingdom. But the legislator explained that this was not necessarily the case, recalling that the company did not achieve the support of the previous conservative government either. And he said that even if they had had that promise, "I am not sure it would have given us the security for a project with a capital investment of the amount that is at stake, especially if issues of that nature are present; lest in the middle of the project we find that there is still another issue, and that was the problem that we had very much in mind. We asked them many questions and gave them plenty of time to answer us, but we did not achieve the satisfaction we expected in the matters raised."The government of the Islands also did not have a contract with the company, so there were no fees to pay, only some legal fees and advice, "but nothing higher in terms of costs"MLA Pollard confirmed that the government remains committed to completing in a timely manner the project of the new port and replacement of the old structure, including the boats, walkways and access roads to be completed no later than the end of 2027."Despite the setback, we remain fully committed to the construction of the port and will continue to advance the project. While this development has proved unfortunate, we are confident in our path forward, and we hope to be able to crystallize this vital project, which is so important for the future of our economic activity."The Falkland Islands Government is already in negotiations with KML Ltd, a marine works contractor based in the United Kingdom, to take over the recently finalised contract with Harland and Wolff of Belfast for the Islands' commercial port replacement project.The legislator-elect with responsibility for Commercial Services, MLA Mark Pollard commented to the weekly Penguin News that this company has been involved in this type of development for a long time, but at the moment I cannot tell you much more about the matter..."Regarding the issue with Harland & Wolff, it was announced that after a detailed review process, the Government of the Islands has decided to finalize further progress in contract negotiations with said company because, "despite productive negotiations, the Government of the Islands and Harland & Woff were unable to achieve a mutually acceptable commercial position."MLA Pollard admitted that it was not an easy decision because "essentially they are struggling and there are jobs at risk, there are people at risk and we wanted to give them every possible opportunity for financial certainty, but in the end we didn't succeed and we also have to think about the people of the Falklands and the project that is so important for the Falklands."MLA Pollard was asked if the outcome was linked to the fact that the company was unable to get the backing of the new Labour government in the United Kingdom. But the legislator explained that this was not necessarily the case, recalling that the company did not achieve the support of the previous conservative government either. And he said that even if they had had that promise, "I am not sure it would have given us the security for a project with a capital investment of the amount that is at stake, especially if issues of that nature are present, and halfway through the project we find that there is still another issue, and that was the problem that we had very much in mind. We asked them many questions and gave them plenty of time to answer us, but we did not achieve the satisfaction we expected in the matters raised."The government of the Islands also did not have a contract with the company, so there were no fees, only some legal fees and advice, "but nothing greater in terms of costs"MLA Pollard confirmed that the government remains committed to completing in a timely manner the project of the new port and replacement of the old structure, including the boats, walkways and access roads to be completed no later than the end of 2027."Despite the setback, we remain fully committed to the construction of the port and will continue to advance the project. While this development has proved unfortunate, we are confident in our path forward, and we hope to be able to crystallize this vital project, which is so important for the future of our economic activity."
gozzie2
08/8/2024
22:32
And the best thing of all ,he really hates me lol ??
gozzie2
Chat Pages: Latest  4555  4554  4553  4552  4551  4550  4549  4548  4547  4546  4545  4544  Older