Rockhopper Exploration Share Discussion Threads

[brazilnut1] 18/12/2020 15:38

Tizo

RKH will have about £25 left in cash wtf you on about go it alone lol lol lol duh.....

[tizo100] 18/12/2020 15:29

Email Sam and ask the question am not obliged to copy anything from his reply matey Imho Sea Lion ticks all the boxes but let's say if Harbour did decide to pullout what's to say that Rockhopper and Navatis go it alone on a smaller project to lower the costs of the project. 

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 14:27

I've a good idea this guy knows more than you hTTps://rocketreach.co/william-david-hartell-email_4762154

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 14:17

Why am I wrong tizo .

[brazilnut1] 18/12/2020 14:10

Petrobras have cancelled the rule about always being the main operator in Brazil so why cant Chrysaor be the main operator ? Pemex a no go for sure.

[tizo100] 18/12/2020 14:07

Wrong againMight be worthwhile emailing Sam

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 13:49

My mate Bill said it was Premier that had caused rockhopper to waste money .Anyway time to make money Good weekend all .

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 13:38

There isn't much anyone could take from what she said ,but Ukef seems to be out of the question now .

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 13:37

Who loves Ya baby lol .

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 13:36

Yes it will Kojak

[tizo100] 18/12/2020 13:28

Time will tell ya BELL END LOL

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 13:20

He thinks a lot .Shame he's always wrong lol

[tizo100] 18/12/2020 13:15

chinahere

Linda Cook also stated they must be the main operator of any project which counts ZAMA in Brazil out so I think that indicates it will be sold off I think the indicators are very good to support the Sea Lion project.

[crackcock12] 18/12/2020 12:58

Right so I heard the Linda Cook webcast again, with a positive mindset.
1. She does need a production base in Latin America.(ie Harbour Energy will take a definite view on Argentina/FI)
2. She needs operator control. (Even at 40% 30% 30%, they do operate.)
3. She needs a conventional offshore resource. (Can't deny Sea Lion is fully appraised bog standard.)

Yes, Sea Lion will compete with Zama, Brazil et al, on these parameters, at various oil prices. (At the highest oil prices, Sea Lion + Isobel are way more juicier than Zama, Brazil, North Sea etc)
At $60-$69 oil price, the Majors sell and Harbour buys.
At $70+ oil price, do Majors still sell acreage, or do they develop?

So.. Pray to your maker that there's an oil mania, panic, boom.

HARBOUR ENERGY CANNOT IGNORE SEA LION ONLY WHEN THERE IS SIMPLY NO OTHER DECENT ACREAGE AVAILABLE TO BUY ANYWHERE AT THE PREVAILING OIL PRICE. i.e. WHEN EVERYBODY ELSE IS DEVELOPING THEIR OWN OFFSHORE PORTFOLIO ASSETS.

[gozzie2] 18/12/2020 12:50

OM is probably keeping it in play .Hanging from his garage lol .I wouldn't normally mock that but il make an exception.

[brazilnut1] 18/12/2020 10:39

Why is this still above 6p ? I have never been involved with anything else like it. Ever.

[crackcock12] 18/12/2020 10:02

$0.02p Bid for 2mm to 5mm shares if you want that year end bid side mark post yesterday's webcast.

[crackcock12] 18/12/2020 10:01

FIG must solve for "x"
$62+ Brent P&L * UK Tax treatment = $50 Brent P&L * x (x= FIG tax treatment)

[chinahere] 18/12/2020 09:56

I wonder what FIG are thinking about here?

If the new Harbour Energy don't want to invest then will FIG even want to extend the licences?

[crackcock12] 18/12/2020 09:53

Linda Cook Bought North Sea at $62+ area Brent
Majors Sold North Sea at $62+ area Brent
$60+ Brent = Price for INORGANIC ACQUISITION CAPITAL

[chinahere] 18/12/2020 09:48

I have to agree CC. Linda did say something along the lines of "I won't talk about specific opportunities but I will tell you our criteria in assessing them".

Top of her list was financial return (positive!?) but she did indeed say that investments with your 5 points would probably 'not make the cut'.

And she was only talking about a few investments and the others didn't have those 5 points did they?