Rock Solid Share Discussion Threads

[hatetrader2] 19/3/2012 21:06

Dont try and do common sense here ducatiman, the pump and dumpers ignore common
sense, what they dont want to mention is if the company is forced to stay listed
then what price the next huge dilutive placing will be, i cannot see it more than
0.5p, infact it could be even lower to keep this outfit going.

[arsene5] 19/3/2012 19:05

An unusally porous rock imo.

[christianf12] 19/3/2012 12:37

Someone is loading up : )

[ianbrewster] 19/3/2012 10:28

It's worth remembering that it is 75% of votes cast that are needed to pass the delist resolution

Pursuant to AIM Rule 41, cancellation of the admission of the Ordinary Shares to trading on AIM requires the consent of not less than 75 per cent. of votes cast by Shareholders (in person or by proxy) in a general meeting.

[hatetrader2] 18/3/2012 21:53

What is very strange is i've known rbonnier from posting here for easily at
least 5 years and he's always been a deramper of bad stocks yet he's got himself
trapped in this dog :-))

[hatetrader2] 18/3/2012 21:24

Very hard to sell 10k's worth as well !

Just keeping it fair, oh sorry you are not familiar with that word are you !

Pump and dump you are very familiar with, ignoring questions about fundamentals
you avoid too, also questions on how the business will ever make a profit, you
avoid answering that one as well !

That's why i think you are scum along with the topinfo pump and dump crowd !

[tara7] 18/3/2012 21:11

I am a buyer!

v hard to get 10k worth.

[tomboyb] 18/3/2012 21:07

"I don't know their motives but two of them seem to have shafted our company in the past. skips and sector bought the OHM business from us in Nov 10 for $150,000. In August 2011 they sold it to EMGS for shares in that business worth £19.4m."


That above is intriguing - shareholders have an entitlement to the quality of assets they subscribe to - Looks like management who hold few and far between in terms of shares are not acting in best interests of minority shareholders - But even though they subscribed at 10p per share what a return that is!

[rbonnier] 18/3/2012 21:01

Well the company need a total of 118,539,717 voting shares saying yes to achieve the delisting seems to me they are over 30,000,000 shares short of this based on the last proxy vote .Should be fun watching the share price if they decide to acquire 30 million shares between them !!

[tomboyb] 18/3/2012 20:57

If post 958 = correct

Then delisting = less regulatory pressure - What's to stop them selling others parts of the business using the same indicator ? What say you?

[christianf12] 18/3/2012 20:38

Wonder if the brokers and advisors are allowed to buy shares? Makes sense if the can as they will lose their fees if RSI delist. They will cover their costs with a years fees at this sp!

Is this allowed?

[christianf12] 18/3/2012 20:34

Is Mr macgregor related to one of directors at RSI with te same surname???

[christianf12] 18/3/2012 20:06

Here is the poster with the same username as one of the RSI directors, hhhmmmmmm