We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhythmone | LSE:RTHM | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYW0RC64 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 169.50 | 168.00 | 171.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/1/2017 14:04 | I think the logic is that they didn't know what the share price would do, they wanted the flexibility of the cash for an acquisition if the right opportunity came along and perhaps also they weren't confident enough about the forward cashflow in the business. And this last point - the inability to forecast cashflow a reasonable time ahead - may be one reason that Ed had to go... | 1gw | |
06/1/2017 14:02 | STT if the perk deal is so bad just close your short and pi55 off | football | |
06/1/2017 13:58 | wheeze, or both... according to the what's been reported, 1R had been talking to Perk for around a year... They were already planning acquisitions when the share price was 1/2 current value... If they had bought back last summer and put the shares in treasury then they could have saved themselves a lot of money... Now they are issuing shares at double the share price .. Where's the logic in that... | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 13:52 | Agree entirely STT - a buyback then may have been more worthwhile than this Perk business | wheeze | |
06/1/2017 13:46 | PerkTV still downtrending... | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 13:45 | SupportFreeContent still stable ... | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 13:13 | header updated with SoL... as I said last month... this month's should be interesting.. May-Jul was stable around 2.7/2.8m before jumping to over 6m... Aug-Nov was stable around 6.1m/6.4m now jumped to 10.6m Any one of the major holders could be lending out shares... sikhthetech - 06 Dec 2016 - 10:01:24 - 1862 of 2307 RHYTHMONE - new Name, new Beginning??? - RTHM SoL due.. Although next month's should be interesting.. | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 13:04 | trades chart in the header, shows a ~240k buy earlier... | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 12:56 | Over 50 now so half price gym membership and I get the odd seat on the tube as well who say getting old as no benefits | football | |
06/1/2017 12:38 | And there's your swimming membership footy | lance corporal winstanley ash | |
06/1/2017 12:38 | LCWA I'm hoping for a lot more than 40p by the end of the month as I need to pay my advfn subs by then or I may have to sell some to cover it | football | |
06/1/2017 12:36 | Wheeze, would have been ideal a few months ago, when the share price was 1/2 current.. | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 12:33 | Will 40p be broken or stick at the dilution price? | lance corporal winstanley ash | |
06/1/2017 11:08 | There is a lot of talk about stock on loan here - my take fwiw is the RTHM stock on loan is moody! "Noticeable increase in shares on loan in December according to Euroclear." Just because stock is registered as "on loan" doesn't mean it is sold short. A loan fee is, or should be charged by a broker to a client, that client in most cases is a hedge fund, they try and devalue a company with deceit and the fee is usually very costly! A risky game when done honestly - but very rarely done honestly! Ok - the broker might have a large % of stock from nominee accounts. If that broker and hedge fund worked together [illegal] they could loan stock from nominee accounts without the owners knowledge. Not charge for the loan, no cost involved - have the stock registered as out on loan and supposedly short the company selected. The share price could be manipulated at no cost and no risk. Stock could be purchased at an undervalued price. Let me think - Tosca managed to buy 6.25mil shares during a quiet period of trading on an aim stock with the share price falling? lol "Noticeable increase in shares on loan in December according to Euroclear." I think you will find there has been more transfer agreements here than the premier league! Imo - there is little or no stock being short sold - there is a corner in place, Tosca upped their holding to 29.6% after the $42.5M all stock transaction with Perk because of dilution - and last but not least.....this price is going to explode with the realisation of the SCAMPI we have witnessed! Rather fun this ah? | barkboo | |
06/1/2017 10:59 | Time to use that shedload of cash to buy back 1 million shares IMO. That should set the cat among the shorters. | wheeze | |
06/1/2017 10:57 | I can understand the negativity here with this share and it is completely warranted with every rns creating more questions than answers but it is becoming quite clear with recent events that there could possibly be a bid coming in sooner rather than later. It would be ridiculous to think it would be many multiples of the current share price, but it will be higher than the current share price is now. All I am saying is, remember why you first came onto the stock market....hopefully it was to make money and not play childish games. As more news comes through via rns, these views can change 😉 | jwoolley | |
06/1/2017 10:10 | 1gw, thanks.. | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 09:20 | Well, it doesn't seem like it was the scaffolders buy in small lots. No need to contact the FCA. Panic over. | stocky | |
06/1/2017 09:19 | Alex, agree CEO and CFO are the roles to watch...Tosca's holding will be diluted and it is possible that they increased their holding to maintain their level... | sikhthetech | |
06/1/2017 09:08 | With the merger every holder will experience a dilution in their holding ... so perhaps Tosca upped their stake to maintain their shareholding? They don't look like they are going to buy R1 outright but they do want to have a stake that gives them significant influence over the terms of any sale. The cash in the bank is significant. If Blinkx had not raised cash prior to the Edelman blog it would be out of business. | alex1621 | |
06/1/2017 08:42 | N+1 Singer again yesterday 05 Jan 17 N+1 Singer Buy 37.63 65.00 65.00 Reiterates 04 Jan 17 N+1 Singer Buy 37.63 56.00 65.00 Reiterates | football | |
06/1/2017 08:23 | Looks like an offer to be pitched in here very soon IMO. | kendonagasaki |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions