Red Rock Resources Share Discussion Threads

[noirua] 01/6/2014 20:33

Jupiter Mines Limited may also be in talks over their Western Australian iron ore interests.

Digging beneath China's interest in Australian iron ore projects

[soulsauce] 01/6/2014 18:49

Funny how as soon as anyone questions the leadership Bell's alter ego surfaces to condemn the post and poster.
Shows how rattled he is at anyone daring to topple him from his rickety perch built upon a pack of cards which at any time could come crashing down.

Quite laughable really.

[atinos auntie ettie] 01/6/2014 14:45

If one is able to decipher the points behind the paragraphs of venom in their post the obnoxious fellow would like to see more leaders or co-leaders at Red Rock and Regency, and a resulting increase of Board emoluments that two senior appointments would bring. If a request to split Chairman and CEO roles at each then that is to split the current way into four sets of emoluments. Some might submit that is illogical and out of touch with the current climate for junior companies. Having those roles embodied in a single person has the benefit of a clear management hierarchy for resolving matters, a lower cost structure than split roles, and currently the group is not big enough for it to be necessary. The combined take from both was reduced last year by 30%. That is not to say it was too high as it has always been fair, but it is right to lessen remuneration to coincide with a lessening of operations. As an aside, that calamitous statesman Blair should not be said in allusion to nor with. The last point made, to see the Colombian balance sheet, that is to say, the accounts of Four Points Mining SAS, is unnecessary as are included in the consolidated group statement and hence fully accounted for, and already largely impaired. A thoroughly tiresome succession of paragraphs but then they come from someone saying the company is based out of Eastbourne Mews when that has not been so for over a year and speaks of non-executives having no faith when only the day previous they had purchased shares or converted amounts owed, en masse. Incorrect and perhaps outdated views from a stale to borrow his own word, former holder.

[dimmerginger] 01/6/2014 13:10

You need to be quick guys.

[digger27] 01/6/2014 12:05

So how do we get rid of him guys? Do we have enough votes collectively to call for a GM to vote him off.

[atino] 01/6/2014 11:26

'Bang on' Ciao...change needed for 'BOTH' companies:-)

[bam bam rubble] 31/5/2014 15:40

Order of importance

1) Staff pay packets
2) YA Global hedge fund (sells newly printed shares to fund the above)
3) PR companies (stock promotion scheme is now an 'exploration' story)
4) Bond Network repayments (insolvency would mean no more pay packets)
5) high net worths on the share register (can be tapped for a placing)
N/A ordinary shareholders

[atino] 31/5/2014 11:15

...not working:-) LOL

...tried 'WD-40 & lubrication'...(but still)...NOT WORKING! hahaha:-))

Hence the 'sale' *__^

[mikemichael2] 31/5/2014 10:58

Yes but what about the crusher ??

[kezman01] 31/5/2014 10:22

RGM did not invest......they received the shares in lieu of cash.
Management have invested.....after raising cash by dilution for working capital which includes wages !! See if you can work out the irony in that transaction.
Dan.....another locked in punter.
Your flogging a dead horse.
No one cares what you say anymore.....even the mugs on LSE can see the reality.
Ciao

[atino] 31/5/2014 08:43

...'back firing' ain't an option! LOL...

...RGM, management & even Dans 'ACTIONS'...have just spoken louder than 'YOUR' WORDS ever could!.... and that remains 'FACT' ^__^ :-))



...ur constant 'negative' gestures...count for NOTHING......I'm afraid:-))...hahahah *__*

[hopeless698] 31/5/2014 07:13

We've been through one of the toughest recessions in memory and RRR are still here and have a small share in what is potentially going to be huge success story ie Jupiter Mines.

Yes...Things could have been done better, i for one hate deadlines been broken or so called sale of assets not happening, that side is very poor. But RRR is still here and could benefit from a huge upturn in the Gold price. Yes... the Gold price will get worse before it gets better, but September onwards such show a considerable upward trend. America is in so much debt. 18 Trillion Dollars and that's just for starters. The Gold price is not a true figure at the moment, it is alleged that certain banks have an influence in the gold price and also that countries are giving false Inventory levels. All this will come out in due course...it always does. Regency is a sure winner and DNI will have a big influence.

Just a word to the RRR management...DO NOT issue RNS's that you are not totally confident in meeting ie purchases of ASSETS & target dates etc.. And also put your money where your mouth is and start buying shares in large quantities to give the shareholders some confidence.

[dimmerginger] 30/5/2014 22:41

Bad Management Rules.

Guys Im sitting inside the tent here. You need to set up a Action group asap and get legal advice. This has got all the makings of papers being burnt in the office.

[rjcdc] 30/5/2014 21:38

Exactly Kez... Good for RGm, bad for RRR.

[kezman01] 30/5/2014 21:36

"Of the Placees, Regency Mines plc has agreed to subscribe for 21,939,447 Shares at GBP0.002279 in settlement of shared costs and obligations"

The key words are "in settlement of shared costa and obligations"

In other words Red Rock owed RGM money, but issued shares instead.

[kezman01] 30/5/2014 21:36

"Of the Placees, Regency Mines plc has agreed to subscribe for 21,939,447 Shares at GBP0.002279 in settlement of shared costs and obligations"

The key words are "in settlement of shared costa and oblogations"

In other words Red Rick owed RGM money, but issued shares instead.

[johndee] 30/5/2014 21:10

0.20 -0.22 Monday I guess.

[atino] 30/5/2014 17:49

LOL (oh look...)

...it looks like...RGM have 'just' bought MORE...into RRR ^__^


(...even the DIRECTORS a little:-) *__^..fink...they might be following in Dans footsteps TBH..hahaha:-)




(tut tut tut)...& 'some' wanted the...'umbilical cord' cut huh??! (well...'carry on'!!) LOL

and thanks 'AAE' (...were you trying to give a 'heads up' ???:-)) ^__* lol

[biffbaffboff] 30/5/2014 17:20

"....a purchase made as an investment....., there is opportunity for all to make money"

mmmmm really?!

[on target] 30/5/2014 16:56

One's emoluments certainly discriminate though!