Quadrise Share Discussion Threads

[dudishes] 01/3/2024 05:01

hazl,

I grant, that you declare your positions, me too.

I'm down on KEFI, not allot.

50% win CUSN against your 50% loss?

You forgot AVCT. I declared my short positions from 101 (which drew threats from certain individuals), then again at 92 with a target of 50 - 55p.

I closed our position at 52p.

That's an awful lot of points and dosh.

We will be back for more when the current fund raise runs out!

cheers

[pyglet] 29/2/2024 23:11

gafas tenidas de rosa

[pyglet] 29/2/2024 23:11

gafas teñidas de rosa

[hazl] 29/2/2024 19:40

'Shareholders raised their concern that existing investors would suffer significant dilution in
any future fundraise. Quadrise recognised the concern and stated their approach would
seek to balance that against the potential need for cash in order to grow & progress. “We
have a bias to action but not at any cost”.

Quadrise shared that conversations regarding Joint Ventures had been progressed –
attractive as the approach would not necessarily be tied to the share price and the
agreement need not be cash based – “Partners can be strategic in accelerating progress”.
They added that current partners (MSC and Cargill) have not expressed, nor was the
company anticipating, any immediate interest in them acquiring a stake in Quadrise. The
collaboration is based on each party contributing its unique expertise and capabilities,
functioning as partners rather than in anticipation of any joint ownership arrangement'.

[kreature] 29/2/2024 16:58

A exciting year ahead, placing, results, AGM ?

[hazl] 29/2/2024 16:28

An exciting year at least.

[kreature] 29/2/2024 15:57

Only 0000000.006 of a penny away from sallad’s 00000000.013 share price expectations ?

[hazl] 29/2/2024 14:33

The Proof of Concept stage would utilise 1,000 tonnes each of MSAR and BioMsar, running
on the whole engine (not just a single cylinder). The POC & LONO fuel would be
manufactured in Antwerp and bunkered in the ARA area, thus retaining the advantage of
favourable taxation arrangements for marine biofuels. Wartsila will be monitoring the trial
and would have a team on board. They would need to have the full 4,000 hours completed
for full LONO.
Sufficient supplies of glycerine are available to support initial rollout but that as demand
grew CSO & pyrolytic sugar alternatives from biomass will become important.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 13:29

Looking at the chart it it is at a pivotal point again where it could go up further on freash news.
When the notes from the meeting have been properly assimilated then that could be the catalyst.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 13:27

It is now in a better place than it was and IS communicating with it's shareholders.
So the past is the past.
The share price has progressed.
We have to move on.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 13:24

It is not just QED that affects the outcome though is it pig?

[pyglet] 29/2/2024 12:14

When a company says it will do something by a certain time it needs to stick to that. If it then becomes apparent that this timeline will slip it should chip in quickly and issue a revised statement saying why? It's all about timely communications and keeping your reputation intact. Not difficult really. Either of these slip then the share price will react accordingly.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 11:44

Progress clearly these things take time .

[hazl] 29/2/2024 11:43

'6
The first of these was a key step and would result in certain activities (and spend)
commencing.
Quadrise would be paid for certain aspects during the trial process including certain
equipment, consumables and services (but not the fuel). The company would not be
supplying fuel to MSC, this was Cargill’s responsibility. MAC2 would be paid for the services
it provided. The LONO fuel supply will utilise HFO as feedstock (rather than resid).
In terms of timescales for the agreements & trials, Quadrise advised that agreements
would need to be finalised by the end of March in order for the trials-related activity to
commence in Q2. Based on that fuel supply to the trials vessel would be in late Q2/early
Q3. Quadrise stated that they were expecting contracts by the end of Q1 at the latest.
With regard to Tolling the structure had been discussed but not yet formalised. The
intention was that any agreement would be progressed/agreed during the POC & LONO
phase (assuming successful outcome of the trials).
Shareholders highlighted the comments made at the AGM re contracts being in place by
the end of December. Quadrise stated that they had been told that this was achievable by
the other parties although availability of resources along with governance processes in
those organisations had ultimately not allowed that to happen. Quadrise emphasised that
there were no fundamental issues or aspects to be resolved which were preventing
progress.
The Proof of Concept stage would utilise 1,000 tonnes each of MSAR and BioMsar, running
on the whole engine (not just a single cylinder). The POC & LONO fuel would be
manufactured in Antwerp and bunkered in the ARA area, thus retaining the advantage of
favourable taxation arrangements for marine biofuels. Wartsila will be monitoring the trial
and would have a team on board. They would need to have the full 4,000 hours completed
for full LONO.
Sufficient supplies of glycerine are available to support initial rollout but that as demand
grew CSO & pyrolytic sugar alternatives from biomass will become important'

[brookemia] 29/2/2024 10:26

What is the difference between Jason Miles and QED SP:

SP is sub 2p😱 🔥🆘❌

🤡Jason Miles🤡 is sub-zero 🤦‍a94;️🤷‍♂ᥧ9;🤷‍♀️⬇;️📉

[kreature] 29/2/2024 10:15

Difficult to know what value some of these companies would see in a tolling agreement ?

[hazl] 29/2/2024 10:11

General Discussion
MSC, Proof of Concept, LONO & Commercial Supply
QED highlighted that beyond that recently announced with Cargill & MAC2 there were 3
outstanding agreements, 3 others were required and in progress;
o A 3 way collaboration between MSC, Cargill & Quadrise
o A fuel supply agreement between MSC & Cargill
o A Tolling Agreement between Cargill & Quadrise

[kreature] 29/2/2024 10:09

Looks like nazel didn’t get an invite either. Did anyone? Would have been nice to just show up to see the place in the middle of all the experiments and business

[hazl] 29/2/2024 10:06

I think it better if it is read in total so I have removed the post.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 10:04

Thanks again to the company and Quorumzine.
This information is usually only available to institutional investors.

[hazl] 29/2/2024 09:58

Interesting clearly some investors of value went to the meeting.

[sallad3] 29/2/2024 09:36

Here is the link to the report on the visit.