Well I mean we had all these contacts with these major players are kept by Vladimir Kusznirczuk, our international trade consultant and by Jose Rios, basically they stand and all these big players say; “Come here, let's sit down and a live demo with your system engineer and anything that you can provide to us”.
... So they went off on a jolly to Miami. |
Well I mean we had all these contacts with these major players are kept by Vladimir Kusznirczuk, our international trade consultant and by Jose Rios, basically they stand and all these big players say; “Come here, let's sit down and a live demo with your system engineer and anything that you can provide to us”.
... So they went off on a jolly to Miami. |
Nope, still struggling to find that damn Betamax player. The poor chap at the FT must be getting more frustrated by the day as I'm sure he'll be keen to update his last article. |
3d video any time now.
GLA LTHers! |
To be fair, they do have something to demonstrate. But they don't need a stall to demonstrate pro-active hand jobs - just appropriate a cubicle in the gents. |
If QBT had anything to demonstrate it would not be faffing about handing out QBT stickers at trade fairs, it would be conducting private demonstrations for individual miners and rig makers.
Exactly this. It makes zero sense to be attending trade fairs when they apparently have NDAs and Jose's contacts. Just exposes yet another lie by PG. |
Why not save the expense of attendance at Miami?
Just put out a video of last year's presentation and interviews (omitting that bit about being 'on track' for revenue by y/e, of course). Oh, and that bit about a medium term plan to design and manufacture specialist chips would have to be omitted too.
So what does that leave? A 3D picture of the girl in the sash, and a clip of Jose and Francesco on the beach in their budgie smugglers. My advice - just feature the girl in the sash; she at least demonstrably has assets. FG and JR don't; pictures in bad taste of them won't mend empty assertions and missed projections.
If QBT had anything to demonstrate it would not be faffing about handing out QBT stickers at trade fairs, it would be conducting private demonstrations for individual miners and rig makers. |
Have done a few of these trade exhibitions.
Lots of hassle, lots of setting up, lots of effort to make your booth appear to be not cheap. PG will need to get banners and other branding designed and manufactured, someone will need to be there to attract people to the stall. Two chaps with a laptop and a couple of Bitaxe rigs will not cut the mustard.
I think they will go their usual route of trying to leech off what is already there. I predict they will not have a stand and will attempt to demo using breakout spaces on portable equipment. Way too short a time frame to get an effective booth up and running. |
Won't happen, don't forget the dreaded NDAs...FG's saviour. Perhaps he'll ask Rios to put on a balaclava and pretend to be a prospect? It would all look very suspect in the cubicle of the gents. |
If he does not publish a picture of himself demonstrating Method C to an attentive and unpaid audience then he should be toast. |
 Interesting from...
UserSteve
RE: Mining conferences
Hexam said "They may not speaking but I presume they will be one of the 200+ exhibitors?"
Good point. I checked the website (from the menu select Sponsor then Join as Sponsor. It says "SECURE YOUR BOOTH Exhibit
Participation as a Sponsor supports both exhibiting and non-exhibiting brands ... Secure your booth sponsorship."
So in order to be an exhibitor, you need to book a booth by becoming a Sponsor. And all Sponsors are listed on the website. Neither QBT nor Gardin are listed as a Sponsor, so it appears they are not yet sponsors and do not yet have an exhibition booth to use. There's still over a week to go so they might very well appear on the website over the coming days. I hope so, as this will be very reassuring.
If QBT are going to be running live demonstrations at this conference then it seems reasonable to expect that they will have a place to do so. I.E a booth and in order to get one you have to be a Sponsor and QBT is not, as yet, mentioned as being a sponsor.
Replace _ with .
It looks like the minimum tier is $10K and a booth comes in at a minimum of $3K/$6K $6K gets them somewhere to play their video.
If QBT do not register as a sponsor then we might be left with FG schlepping around the hall with Method C in his rucksack accosting other unsuspecting attendees with a "Pst. Wanna see my thing mine 30% faster. I've got a 3D video. Nudge Nudge." |
QBT Business Update..heah mug punters, everything is going backwards but don’t worry, we’re all off to Miami next week. See you in a few months for another placing..innit. |
big news at he1 tonight
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
14 March 2025
JACKSON 31 FLOW TEST AND GAS ANALYSIS UPDATE
GALACTICA PROJECT
Highlights
▪ Strong Reservoir Flow: Jackson 31 flowed naturally during drilling and at TD.
▪ Increasing Natural Flow Rates: Flow rate since TD has increased to 250 Mcfd naturally.
▪ Projected Stabilised Flow Rates: 300-400 Mscfd constrained to optimise production, with
a maximum potential rate of 500 Mscfd.
▪ Helium Concentration: Early samples return helium concentration of up to 2.2% (air
corrected) (up to 1.90% not air corrected), expected to represent around 2.3% to 2.5%
helium in reservoir based on State #16 recent equilibrated samples.
Blue Star Helium Limited (ASX:BNL, OTC:BSNLF) (Blue Star or the Company) is pleased to
announce initial results from the Jackson 31 SENW 3054 development well at its Galactica helium
project in Las Animas County, Colorado. |
There seems to be some excitement over on LSE regarding a 'breakthrough' by D-Wave...
Indeed QBT have had some exposure to the company in the past...
Notice that D-Wave were then and are now offering access to Quantum Annealing technologies.
You might suppose that the nature of this becomes a bit suspect when the company mentions 5,000+ qubit implementations.
Google’s latest iteration of its quantum machine, the Sycamore quantum processor, currently holds 70 qubits. This is a substantial leap from the 53 qubits of its earlier version. This makes the new processor approximately 241 million times more robust than the previous model.
How can D-Wave claim 5,000 qubits when poor old Google is still stuggling along at 70?
This is because D-Wave qubits are totally different to Google qubits. You might characterise Google qubits as being multi-state and amenable to general purpose calculations whereas D-Wave qubits are lowest-state and amenable to single purpose calculations.
Indeed the release from D-Wave suggests a materials science application in magnetics where the process of annealing would be expected to make predictions as to how such materials might crystalise.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the task that QBT have set for themselves and indeed the suggestion made over on LSE that it will accelerate their development of such ideas is entirely misplaced.
This of course will beg the question as to why did QBT make such a song and dance about their involvement with D-Wave in the past and your simple answer is that QBT were once again misleading their investors.
Quantum Annealing Computer ≠ Quantum Computer but it's close enough to fool the ignorant investor, as it has done over on LSE and drive the share price.
Your other nicer but equally unappealing answer is that QBT set up a paid for jolly for someone to make use of D-Waves technology for research totally unrelated to their stated goals. |
Fort Lauderdale = Caught Fraudorfail |
FLC, anddown, yes.
Some of the execs of the big hitters may drop in at a trade show to meet other top execs they already know and do business with, but they won't be trawling the stands of hopeful loss making penny companies with the company cheque book in hand.
In fact, such people probably won't tour the stands at all. They will meet with other big players away from the fair, using the fair simply as as an opportunity to meet others in the same town at the same time.
You all heard FG. He has been touting QBT's wonder tech for years, and has been told that it is for him to demonstrate that it works, in live demonstrations in real time. The message given him, loud and clear, is: 'If and when you have something ready to roll out commercially tell us and ask for an opportunity to demonstrate it to us. until then, we don't want to hear from you.'
FG also recognises that the whole sector is sceptical of his claims, and that if he does ask for an opportunity to demonstrate the tech to a potential customer it had better work, because they won't risk having their time wasted twice.
Serious, profit making, companies employ people to PREVENT time wasters selling moonbeams from contacting their senior executives, never mind their CEOs. When a self designated 'consultant' (aka a fired employee of a company in trouble like Intel) turns up acting for an outfit like QBT that does not impress them. Their reaction is 'Poor sod. Still out of work. By next week he will be selling cleaning products door to door'.
QBT attends these fairs in order to have something - anything - to talk about when it next needs to raise cash. Same with the videos, 3D or otherwise, and the interviews.
How many CEOs of the big miners and the rig makers do you think watch the videos or listen to the interviews? I'll tell you. The same number as traipse around trade fairs in the hope of being given a promotional baseball cap, and to collect company stickers and free chocolates. |
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
Hot Features
Premium
