ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

PRM Proteome Sciences Plc

4.15
0.64 (18.23%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Proteome Sciences Plc LSE:PRM London Ordinary Share GB0003104196 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.64 18.23% 4.15 3.50 4.80 - 423,867 16:35:28
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Biological Pds,ex Diagnstics 7.78M 1.33M 0.0045 7.80 10.36M
Proteome Sciences Plc is listed in the Biological Pds,ex Diagnstics sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PRM. The last closing price for Proteome Sciences was 3.51p. Over the last year, Proteome Sciences shares have traded in a share price range of 2.97p to 8.50p.

Proteome Sciences currently has 295,182,056 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Proteome Sciences is £10.36 million. Proteome Sciences has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 7.80.

Proteome Sciences Share Discussion Threads

Showing 157251 to 157272 of 157525 messages
Chat Pages: 6301  6300  6299  6298  6297  6296  6295  6294  6293  6292  6291  6290  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
14/2/2024
08:23
goatherd,

You are Joe Biden and I claim my £5.

james japp
14/2/2024
08:19
Is the company aware of this scenario??.Personally think it may be a revelation to them and they have missed a trick here.!!!!
peverill
14/2/2024
07:15
There is desperation and there is desperation, but this is desperation supercharged, twin turbocharged, nitrous oxide boosted and pimped to the max.

No matter, good morning all.

monte1
13/2/2024
23:28
There are specialist financiers who provide funds in that situation. Mr Bates used them when he took the Post Office on, and won. (It is all available on a streaming service - well worth watching IMHO.)

But, if a company knows there is a clear, genuine, case they are unlikely to want to take it to court; much cheaper to settle, and they may manage to negotiate lower patent %s than a court would award - and they would avoid having to pay both sides costs.

goatherd
13/2/2024
23:27
Or as Jim Royle would have put it -

"Gateway? My @rse"

jeffian
13/2/2024
23:25
Let's face it; they're all avoiding the Toll Road and carrying on up the M6.
jeffian
13/2/2024
23:12
I haven't really been following PRM for some time, I thought they were making progress but now they are relying on the Great Gateway of patent infringement you. How will they afford to take anyone on in court.
the bull
13/2/2024
22:19
No peverill, I think it was serious. And also true.
goatherd
13/2/2024
22:16
elpirata,

I do not understand that sentence. Could you translate, please

goatherd
13/2/2024
20:29
Is it Rednose day over on the educated thread.Surely that exchange between Richard and pools was all in jest.????
peverill
13/2/2024
20:06
I wouldn't want to be out of these over the weekend....


Oh, and the MMs want your shares.

dominiccummings
13/2/2024
19:57
and you are surely a parody account goatherd
elpirata
13/2/2024
19:35
You overate the accuracy of journalists.
goatherd
13/2/2024
18:36
well heres your starter

"labs in the UK" could be Proteome, could they not?

Since when has Frankfurt been annexed by the UK?

tia

elpirata
13/2/2024
17:08
elpirita,

"labs in the UK" could be Proteome, could they not?

We all need to remember that use in trials does not need the patent holders permission. But clinical use does.

And the patent holder may well not even know that trials are being conducted. And will probably not be told if the patented idea is being used in the clinic - they have to find out for themselves.

Actually I believe the trials people may not even know they are using a patented product, I think it can come as a nasty shock.

A nice shock for shareholder's though.

goatherd
13/2/2024
16:37
Jeffian, they probably will find a buyer.


edit:

Ok, so I'm not quite sure why I'm bothering to respond to this but, for the less well informed, trolls and numpties on here: -

Firstly, being the first 'commercial' test for p-tau 217 means absolutely nothing.

Secondly, an accurate Alzheimer's disease diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic test will consist of many different biomarker measures.

Thirdly, the most valuable aspect of AD biomarker IP will be for the design of therapeutics, not the relatively simple measure of disease state.

Finally, I believe Proteome Sciences has significant valuable intellectual property which is currently in the process of being granted, so therefore has very long patent life to approximately late 2030's early 2040's.

pools2
13/2/2024
16:31
#59638,
Aye, close up shop. If the IP has any value, they should find a buyer to take it.

jeffian
13/2/2024
16:31
There are significant hurdles for best funded companies. They mostly have to wait for a "consensus view" before producing a test or assay.
pools2
13/2/2024
16:29
No Jeffian, I agree.

But, can you think of a better strategy?

goatherd
13/2/2024
16:04
What a 'plan'.

Mothball the business with zero forward strategy.

james japp
13/2/2024
16:01
goatherd,

Agreed. Proteome Sciences state this in their reports and more recently in their webinars. Institutions and companies are now discovering the same Alzheimer's disease biomarkers that PRM have already discovered and patented.

pools2
13/2/2024
15:59
Not so far, it isn't.
jeffian
Chat Pages: 6301  6300  6299  6298  6297  6296  6295  6294  6293  6292  6291  6290  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock