Proteome Sciences Share Discussion Threads

[elpirata] 07/2/2024 13:43

yes, it cant be arboricultural due to lack of trees standing

[monte1] 07/2/2024 13:41

If you will forgive me, all of this ramping comes across as a bit - how can I put this - ‘agricultural’.

[james japp] 07/2/2024 10:46

I note that #59606 has 4 Thumbs ups, actually make that 5!

[monte1] 07/2/2024 10:42

Quite, I wonder how well that strategy has worked out for previous investors*?









*suckers

[james japp] 07/2/2024 10:21

Riiiiiight.

[wasjobber] 07/2/2024 10:20

Investors need to buy these while there's no demand, otherwise they'll be paying a lot more for them after the news is released.

[james japp] 07/2/2024 10:17

I wonder if there has ever been a less convincing case for labeling a stock a "STRONG BUY" than this?

No trades at all on Monday, just 2 all day yesterday totaling around £500 worth of stock and none again so far today.

[wasjobber] 07/2/2024 10:12

Proteome Sciences should get their new isotopic plexDIA reagent license deal very soon. This opens up a whole new market segment of mass spec users keen to multiplex their measurements.

Of course the release of their new 32-plex TMTpro is also due soon.

I don't think many investors on here have fully understood the positive implications for Proteome Sciences of all these higher plexing reagents that are imminent.

STRONG BUY

[canaletto] 06/2/2024 01:12

Martin, yes...Stephen, no.

[canaletto] 06/2/2024 01:11

I will never get over how Stephen Diggle fell for the CJP snake oil salesman pitch.

[peverill] 05/2/2024 22:54

When is this US listing due,and at what price will it float or will it be mothballed like everything else.Where is this Stroke test that never gets a mention anymore.

[peverill] 01/2/2024 23:50

Could be a revisit to 3.5/3p area coming.

[alchemy] 01/2/2024 17:15

Probably true but not a tautology or there again . Quite a puzzling statement .

[goatherd] 01/2/2024 14:56

I disagree.

[coldale1] 01/2/2024 13:13

FSE was on the money as was NNN. Goatherd should be eating humble pie for breakfast lunch and dinner...

[small crow] 31/1/2024 13:34

Good thread this.

[james japp] 31/1/2024 12:47

goatherd - 07 Jul 2003 - 08:39:00 - 18128 of 33240 Proteome Sciences results in big news CJD + Stroke tests - PRM

Tuco,

I do take your point but I am not interested in a private conversation with FSE.

I am interested in not letting him get away with claims like "I think we are all agreed that Proteome is medium to high risk". I for one am not - and I think Peter Snodgrass is not either.

If FSE does not post I will not pursue him; or if someone else points out where he is wrong I will be glad to hand the batten over!

Richard

[goatherd] 31/1/2024 12:37

Canaletto,

My reporting may have been at fault. I believe what I actually said was more like "I expect six - - - " which I think even you would agree was not a lie.

Unfortunately I have not the time to research it back.

Perhaps I should amend my statement to "I never knowingly lie". But that, I think would be a tautology.

[james japp] 31/1/2024 12:27

goatherd 31 Jan '24 - 12:24 - 4365 of 4365

[james japp] 31/1/2024 11:34

Arraws Canaletto.

[canaletto] 31/1/2024 07:53

I never lie............. I did report this, but because I like to be conservative, I said it was six projects.