We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.025 | -2.56% | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.975 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1,246,763 | 08:43:35 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -0.86 | 39.5M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/5/2018 14:14 | Was in June last year. | englishlongbow | |
22/5/2018 13:58 | When are the Annual Results out? | englishlongbow | |
22/5/2018 08:10 | It would be good to actually have a reasonable discussion about the pros and cons of investment here rather then just berating and a clear lack of interest in the share.If you think it's that bad just stop posting on the board and move on elsewhere unless you post reasonable facts against and support them with sensible comments.This also goes for those who post positive facts as well. | mertymcs | |
22/5/2018 07:58 | Groan, how’s your maths Ken? The existing process churns out 16 times more co2 than the PHE process,Do you not agree that 1 tonne is much better than 16 tonnes? | fozdad | |
22/5/2018 07:49 | I am a natural cynic. | ken chung | |
21/5/2018 14:02 | Come on people lets be nice to one another. | englishlongbow | |
21/5/2018 10:03 | I didn’t call deccer1 a liar, that was a word he used, not me. I said his statements numbered 8 to 12 were wrong, and I still stand by that. He twists information to produce misleading and biased statements to suit his own agenda. so no humble pie i’m afraid. | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 09:44 | To be fair its good to have a discussion. | englishlongbow | |
21/5/2018 09:22 | I never denied that, deccer1, it’s just that your focus is on the 1 tonne of CO2 produced rather than the saving of 15 tonnes of CO2 compared to current treatments such as incineration. Surely that is a massive benefit to the environment, don’t you think? | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 09:19 | Every thing produces CO2 it is part and parcel of life.If you look at anything over a period of time you can twist the figures to suit your own opinions.It's all just a big game of moving where the source of CO2 comes from, look at electric cars.The car is more efficient in CO2 emission, but the process to make the car releases CO2 in similar of not more then existing vehicles.Over a long enough period and as technology improves things will get better but at the moment it is just a bandwagon that people are jumping onto in order to get free money from grants etc. | mertymcs | |
21/5/2018 08:49 | Its an improvement on other waste to energy systems. | deccer1 | |
21/5/2018 08:42 | If they produce 1 tonne of CO2 it is still less than the 16 tonnes of CO2 that would be produced otherwise. So what would you suggest they do with the 1 tonne of CO2? | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 08:16 | If you look at some of the recent slides. | deccer1 | |
21/5/2018 08:15 | So its better to send them to PHE than dump them in the sea. | deccer1 | |
21/5/2018 08:11 | That isn’t a fact, it just doesn’t happen. Think about it. - PHE’s objective is to turn environmentally harmful substances such as plastics and old tyres (and other waste materials) into energy and fuels. Surely you wouldn’t expect them to vent methane, which is about 30 times more harmful than CO2, into the atmosphere? | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 07:52 | I am just trying to understand all the facts as PHE looks like an exciting investment opportunity. | englishlongbow | |
21/5/2018 07:47 | English, the methane is not vented to the atmosphere, it is part of the syngas that is used as fuel. Please don’t post misleading rubbish. Do proper research and get your facts right. | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 07:40 | Thank you fozdad, that’s the point I was trying to make. But deccer1 chooses to ignore this fact and prefers to twist it the other way round to suit his own agenda, whatever that is. | vatnabrekk | |
21/5/2018 07:33 | For every one tonne of hydrogen produced by PHE to replace a tonne produced the conventional way, it reduces 15 tonnes of CO2 gas discharged to the atmosphere, so reducing harmful greenhouse gases and global warming | fozdad | |
21/5/2018 07:26 | Lets see the roll out. | deccer1 | |
21/5/2018 00:11 | vatnabrekk & deccer1 Slide 6 The PHE method of producing Hydrogen creates one sixteenth as much CO2 as the conventional method, so reduces the greenhouse gases significantly on a comparable basis with the conventional method | fozdad | |
21/5/2018 00:08 | Allaun is putting a lot of effort into spreading the word about their new DMG system. | englishlongbow | |
20/5/2018 23:49 | The syngas must be a mixture that includes hydrogen . | englishlongbow | |
20/5/2018 22:49 | Vatnabrekk,..how do the directors prevent commercially share price sensitive information gathered whilst being s director at PHE from being disclosed to the board at Waste2Tricty? The RNS announcing the appointments did not mention what the procedure s are to cover this share price sensitive information. | nelson5100 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions