Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[dolphin158] 06/8/2017 16:34

In my opinion you are a ramper and until you explain why you have failed to prevent the company continually committing financial reporting errors.

Why were the 2016 accounts filed so only received on 18 July at companies house? Only a ramper would dismiss this as irrelevant.

Why are the 2016 interim accounts still contain errors such as note 5? Only a blatant ramper would dismiss this as irrelevant.

Let's examine compliance with Aim Rule 26, does the company fully comply with the rules?

[dolphin158] 06/8/2017 14:10

You had better be able to explain your lies Paul Warwick as I have repeatedly posted on here that I am not paid for posting on any BB, do not work for nor have any connection with any mm or other financial institution.

The only explanation is you have to ramp the share? Not forgetting that you regularly posted you would not sell but we're all long term shareholder only for the recent sale to finance a holiday.

No mention of the accounting errors? Note 5 of the 2016 interim accounts is that accurate or wrong? Why has the company failed to correct the accounts? I am sure the FCA will want to know why you as a shareholder have failed to have these corrected?

[superbarnet] 06/8/2017 13:40

Why beat yourself up just filter them

[dolphin158] 06/8/2017 10:42

Tick tock tick tick, wasn't that the CTAG countdown clock to the launch of their product.

[dolphin158] 05/8/2017 19:11

What are the rampers Warwick69 etc Al going to do if it isn't a commercial success, which is completely different to if the thing works.

Remember Beta max was deemed the superior product over VHS video but which one succeeded financially?

It is also down to marketing, financial strength, people and above overall clout each company brings to their selling.

[dolphin158] 05/8/2017 11:52

Hope all the rampers have enjoyed trying to pump this company in which the directors have not purchased a single share except for one who only holds about £1,100 worth.

Only this week we found that the company's accounts were filed on 18 July when they needed to be there by 30 June to avoid being fined.

Why would a quality company allow it's accounts to be filed late in consecutive years?

Lastly as a certain posters always alleges I confirm that I do not work for any MM and do get paid for my postings not have any short position in ANY share.

[deccer1] 04/8/2017 19:22

Dont know what you mean beeezzz.

[beeezzz] 04/8/2017 17:13

deccer1...

You still haven't answered my question regarding "Westinghouse Plasma Gasification" plants that are actually working continuously, since Air Products abandon their system.

[new tech] 04/8/2017 15:13

I have placed a link in the thread header to a recent interview with PHE's Keith Alaun, which seems to confirm much of what Warwick has been saying. Only heard it myself today for the first time so it might have been overlooked by others.

[nelson5100] 04/8/2017 12:15

Can anybody explain why the company's accounts were date stamped received at companies house as 18 July 2017?

A public limited company is required to file its accounts within 6 months of its accounting reference date. So the accounts should have been received by 30 June 2017.