We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poole Invest. | LSE:PIV | London | Ordinary Share | GB0007176901 | ORD 5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 5.50 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/8/2007 15:33 | Unless somebody else steps up to the plate soon, this looks a done deal! Looks like they are nearly there!(4.15pm) | fhmktg | |
13/8/2007 14:18 | And 14 mln + X 2. Matched bargains, I guess, but whose? Edit: all is revealed and all very interesting, especially the wording of the RNS and juxtaposition of " today". Starlight sell the 14.25 mln to Inland today, but the 25.851 mln was already part of the previously declared 23%. | esrimeur | |
13/8/2007 14:14 | That will need an RNS - but interesting if its somebody other than Inland! | fhmktg | |
13/8/2007 13:21 | Err, this 2 X 25mln+ reported everywhere as ordinary trades? | esrimeur | |
09/8/2007 22:07 | Somebody will need to step up to the plate before the closing date for Inland's bid - lets see the timetable, when the offer documents come out. | fhmktg | |
09/8/2007 20:06 | They have 23.5% irrevocable undertakings including there own shares. They have a long way to go. I am of the opinion that 6p is to cheap, I also do not like the pressure they are trying to put us under by saying they will cancel the listing. I,m prepared to wait for planning permission so i say we hold on. | billbyrne | |
09/8/2007 17:09 | So, that's it then? 6p seems pretty miserable! | fhmktg | |
06/8/2007 13:27 | Any view on the likely exit price, Sandbank? Thanks for cheering me up! | fhmktg | |
06/8/2007 10:13 | Well I certainly do NOT get the impression that everything has been kicked into touch . I believe there is even some doubt as to whether the October AGM will be held at all . - in other words PIV will have been taken out by then | sandbank | |
06/8/2007 10:09 | I wish we could get a statement from the board, saying have an alternative, higher ,offer! | fhmktg | |
06/8/2007 10:01 | More buys than sells this morning when you add them all up. The killer spread is putting people off trading - but it';s not really a tradeable share in any case . My feeling is though that everything is on track for the Inland acquisition. The directors are sitting on all their shares. | sandbank | |
06/8/2007 09:01 | AGM not until October - will this be sorted by then (the 'bid' and the planning application?) | fhmktg | |
01/8/2007 11:39 | Bit of trading by Barclays, but they are hanging on to 10% of the Company. With all the turmoil in the market at the moment - any views on how Poole will pan out over the coming weeks? I could do with this wrapping up, to give me some cash, but I am hungry for a couple of pence more. | fhmktg | |
27/7/2007 22:26 | Hopefuly the next few weeks should bring SOME form of response from the board - if they dont have a sense of the value, heaven help us! I look for a rebuttal on the basis of unrealistically low value! But then, its pouring down here as well! | fhmktg | |
26/7/2007 08:39 | Just a few musings while I watch the rain!! I expect to hear about interest in PIV from other potential bidders. Surely it is not just Inland plc who see the value in PIV? Then again, if Inland do not pursue their interest, I guess PIV will fall back a little - a good time to buy perhaps?. So, do I sell half now and lock in the profit and gamble that the remainder will be taken out for at least 6p? Hmmm, decisions decisions! Good luck all anyway, it has been worth the wait - just. | bodgit | |
25/7/2007 14:57 | LONDON (Thomson Financial) - Inland PLC said it has made an indicative offer for Poole Investments PLC at 6 pence a share, in cash. The real estate company said the indicative offer is final and will not be increased but added that there is no certainty of a formal offer being made. | phipster | |
23/7/2007 11:08 | Fhmktg, I certainly don't claim better knowledge, but I had taken the disclosures to mean that Stable and Peter Ward had both disposed of their holdings completely at 6p, with Inland being the buyer. I assume that Barclays may have many clients and just has to report their buys and sells. Does look though that Inland are serious and can't now make an offer at less than 6p. Given the densities Gallagher are going for on their adjoining site in their recent outline planning application, I think PIV must be worth more than 6p. | actonman | |
23/7/2007 06:39 | Can anybody with better knowledge interpret the various trading positions so far? Seems that Inland are buying at 6p, whilst Barclays and Stable are trading long positions at 6p, anticipating a higher price? | fhmktg | |
19/7/2007 12:44 | Nearly 10% of this company traded today. Could get exciting | hybrasil | |
19/7/2007 08:45 | So approximately 185 million shares at 6p per share values the company at £11.1 million? | ford barfle | |
17/7/2007 09:26 | sandbanks Is the Pilkington plant just upper left of the development? If so it is clear to see the reason for J.J. Galagher buying our shares. M | milacs | |
16/7/2007 16:23 | MILACS: What's also important and interesting about this is the degree of public support which the plans have already attracted | sandbank | |
16/7/2007 14:20 | A little bit interestig eh!!! M | milacs |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions