Physiomics Share Discussion Threads

[howdlep] 28/7/2018 17:07

PWhite73,

I have the two contract notes, so be careful what you say. As for my reasoning, it's in the chart re resistance and support. It's how I trade with a portion of my holding.
As someone with no holding, are you going to continue to provide further insights into how we should all trade?
I mean the move from 1p to 32p was just a ploy by those evil MM's and had nothing to do with contract news?
As for placings in general, it's how AIM works. They are needed until a company is cash positve, or receives investment or is taken over.
But PYC have now raised at 4p, so I can just wait for that contract RNS. Or maybe something even better?
8p before 2p. Aye that 2:1 trading strategy I keep referring to.
Yours is to post when you neither hold or short.
Any trolls on this bb I wonder?
Pennies are paid for engaging investors.
Let's see what Monday brings.

[pwhite73] 28/7/2018 14:40

howdlep - "I can therefore state, as part of that process, I sold a token 58k @ 5.015p and then bought back 50k @ 4.59p."

You're a liar. If you thought the stock was heading for 8p why would you be cashing in at 5.015p in the belief you could pick up the stock cheaper at 4.59p.

One thing I do agree with is that shorting the stock if there is no placing is suicidal not because of any likely company changing news but because the crooked market makers would simply move the price in the opposite direction from your short if it was large enough.

As far as another placing is concerned that I am 100% certain of. Placings are not like placings of yesteryear where a broker would take on a line of stock then try to flog them to the markets. Placings are a continual work in progress. They can take 3,6 up to 12 months to drip feed the stock direct to mug PIs.

PYC increased the amount of shares in issue by 22% at the last 4p placing. Why has there been no holding RNS? because the stock went to mug PIs all holding less than 3%.

[zen12] 28/7/2018 13:20

Howdlep - spot on. With the placing gone, this is significantly derisked. Great volume and sentiments returning in abundance. Possibly contract news also?

[margic] 28/7/2018 12:46

Could be a rebuffed type rns. I.e what they 'envisage' doing with Merck for next year. Around 8-9months in with year 1 with Merck, a couple of months left of the first year so surely they must be discussing the next part of the 'multi-year services agreement' ? Anything better than that and I'm pretty sure this last through 8p from here. Should the momentum pick up Monday we can write off an immediate pump and dump and look for the high of any spike to come. See where that takes us, if you miss it, settle on a lower price, mostly have to anyways as it can be impossible selling at a peak ! A bit pin the tale on the donkey too !

[howdlep] 28/7/2018 12:09

spacedust,

With all stocks that we deem illiquid, I have clear risk/reward stratergies and entry/exit points. I suspect you do also, so very much doubt you hold stock bought at 9p. Everyone had the option to trade a position up to 32p. Post that, many have taken a position, only to see the 4p placing. But now that is out of the way, the risk/reward has changed very much in the favour of longs. Shorting this stock now is total madness. That said, I hope there are still many in place.

8p before 2p, based on 2:1 risk/reward. Quote me when I am wrong.

[howdlep] 28/7/2018 12:00

PWhite7327 Jul '18 - 21:54 - 3598 of 3604

howdlep - "I had no problems with sell quotes at 5p"

Had you asked for a quote of a £100 worth then 5p would be no problem. Had you asked for a quote of a £1000 worth they would have told you your trade cannot be executed and has to be sent to a dealer.

-----

Once again, you are talking rubbish and that is a FACT. However, you then try to disguise that rubbish with the caveat that MM's will often allow quotations but not confirmation. Of course, that is the case on some trades and they do use quotations to gauge sentiment. As do spreadbetting companies.
However, your statement re £1000 is plucked out of the air and in the case of PYC on Friday, an absolute lie.
Why, because I always test the market re online limits and add/reduce positions when the situation requires.
I can therefore state, as part of that process, I sold a token 58k @ 5.015p and then bought back 50k @ 4.59p.
Besides, did you actually try confirming a purchase or sale yesterday? Er no, so how would you know!
Liquidity was excellent yesterday and I suspect both volume and momentum will pickup further on Monday.
As for your comments re takeovers. Struth by that token, no company would ever be taken over. You should write to the CEO of the likes of Glaxo and say they should continue to spend hundreds of millions on R&D, rather than take out companies like PYC for a fraction of the price.
So keep on posting as you do. You are not a holder, nor you say, are you a shorter of the stock. I only wish you were short. This is a very dangerous stock to be shorting, as there is no placing coming. Just look out for that 7am contract RNS. It's coming soon.
We have had the 1p to 32p gain, now let's see where the next contract takes us to. Obviously, all will depend on the value of the company and will take into account the current market cap. At a price of 4.6p, that cap is £3.3m.

Edit: those MM's confirmed c12m volume of trades. Perhaps they were on an extended lunch and forgot to NT all the trades!

[margic] 28/7/2018 11:40

Ooooopppss. That had happpened before lol

[margic] 28/7/2018 11:39

So are you also suggesting Merck contracts average £150-250k not the £35k?

[margic] 28/7/2018 11:38

No, I'm talking about how many get tested a year. A test is far far far away from a design

[spacedust] 27/7/2018 22:12

Howdlep I hope you are right. I bought in at 9p thinking I've bought low in order to sell higher. Only I've mugged myself during th3 JC saga.

This will never happen to me again at pyc. I will break even or lose the lot.that my final decision

[pwhite73] 27/7/2018 22:04

Dummy orders are meaningless. The MM know mug PIs use them more than they use real orders. Indeed they use dummy orders to gain valuable market information. How many times have you got a good quote pressed the sell button only to find the trade will not go through. Good prices are always given on dummy orders because the MM know it convinces you to hold. 'They want my stock' mug PIs say to themselves when in fact they don't.

[pwhite73] 27/7/2018 22:00

The rumour is the same rumour that has been doing the rounds for 15 years. A big pharma is going to pay £100m for PYC. Why pay a £100m today when for the better part of £15 years they could have picked it up for as litlle as £750k.

[margic] 27/7/2018 21:58

Got to say mate I put a dummy order for £3500 at 4.90-5.10 mid 5.02 and was offered 4.987p. Did try £5k at 5p sell price didn't get a firm offer.

[margic] 27/7/2018 21:55

What's the rumour?

[pwhite73] 27/7/2018 21:54

howdlep - "I had no problems with sell quotes at 5p"

Had you asked for a quote of a £100 worth then 5p would be no problem. Had you asked for a quote of a £1000 worth they would have told you your trade cannot be executed and has to be sent to a dealer.

[margic] 27/7/2018 21:53

No doubt into the hundreds of not 1000's

[margic] 27/7/2018 21:53

How many does a company like Glaxo test a year? Merck seem to be doing at least 12 with PYC alone

[howdlep] 27/7/2018 21:49

davet,

change your broker, I had no problems with sell quotes at 5p

spacedust,

no placing needed, a new contract is coming. Buy low, sell very high. The opportunity is there right now. As you will see on Monday.

[spacedust] 27/7/2018 21:40

This company had Eli Lilly on their books for years. Now merck still placing issued to the ground. Drop drip destroy will continue .....in the interim hopefully Some of us mugs will be given a chance to break even.

This rise is most likely for the next placing. What ever happened to the last reason for the placing???? They spouted some rubbish about 'match fund'

You couldn't make this shttt up.

[davevt] 27/7/2018 21:33

For all you know Glaxo is already a customer, and one of the ones spending 35k.

It doesn't matter if 'super duper Mega pharma worth 100 trillion' comes on board, if they only have one cancer drug to test this year, it's 35 grand.

People are making up income figures that don't relate to the services offered.

It's like getting excited that bill gates wants to buy a kettle off you. Guess what, your most expensive kettle is 50 quid. It doesn't matter how much money bill has, he isn't going to give to ten grand for a 50 quid kettle.

[davevt] 27/7/2018 21:30

Howdlep, that's rubbish, I bought 2 grands worth at the bottom, and couldn't even sell 100 quid of it at 4.7, eventually after about 20 attempts got rid of it all at 4.5. Sells were not going through easily.

[spacedust] 27/7/2018 20:52

I couldn't careless how the price gets to 10p. This is not a company that will succeed or ever make or to ftse.

This company is about placing galore. Milking cow machine

[zen12] 27/7/2018 20:02

If rumour is anywhere near true, this should go easily beat your first target. GL

[howdlep] 27/7/2018 19:47

One little problem with that theory. There never was a problem selling all afternoon. That was because volume was very high, providing two way liquidity.
Monday will be interesting, as the momentum traders arrive.
Shorting this stock is suicidal, as the placement is out of the way. Placees are out or wanting capital appreciation. Those who are long are waiting for contracts.
8p before 2p, I did give warning.
Spacedust is long, you know you want to Pwhite73. It's the only way to put all those theories to bed... :-)
Enjoy that weekend now, Monday will be here soon enough.