[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Petrel Resources Plc LSE:PET London Ordinary Share IE0001340177 ORD EUR0.0125 (CDI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 1.725 1.70 1.75 1.725 1.70 1.70 750,000 08:33:40
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.0 -0.4 -0.3 - 3

Petrel Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 34776 to 34797 of 35450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1394  1393  1392  1391  1390  1389  1388  1387  1386  1385  1384  1383  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
06/7/2021
09:46
WHO are EYCP ? A salient question...surely ?
exile
06/7/2021
09:33
f31, wants everyone to ignore the difficult questions and ignore the advice of the company directors he has had his faith in for 25 years. Instead he wants to put faith in an unproven entity that has a recent years track record of in their words "perhaps breaking company law" and certainly not delivering on the RNS'd promises to the Scandinavian listed company. f31 clearly has no clue who EYCP are and I guess , does not want to find out. What happened to the promises of just "90 days"? Why were the shares sold to the CP on CREDIT ? Since they were sold on tick , why did they not pay up on time ? Why 18 months later have they still not paid? As DH is reported to have written - if they only have to find £250k to release £1.1m of shares why have they not done so ? I asked that a 15months ago. After all it REALLY is FREE money , no ? RT is described as a billionaire , so what does he need PET or Ross Group for ? Both companies are on their uppers. All these and many other questions , will not be answered , in this weeks episode of SOAP........ ps Alien Burt was much more convincing.....
fenners66
06/7/2021
09:22
Can I ask everybody during this important discussion to not react but instead simply ignore Fenner's posts (and under whatever other alias he is posting his nonsense), as it will only pollute a constructive discussion between the real shareholders. The important thing for shareholders is to as good as possible inform themselves about their possible future chances with Petrel continuing its long standing strategy, versus the option of Tamraz Group involvement. It is not important for shareholders to react in any way to a nitwit, so simply filter him and all his other aliases - you won't miss out on anything important.
f31
06/7/2021
08:37
fenner66 over on "The Dark Side" has made some interesting comments regarding this fiasco and I hope he dosn't mind if I repost some of his comments here. fenners665 Jul '21 - 19:55 - 14402 of 14407 0 0 0 Wow ! Got to say La La Land makes good reading tonight. What is the phrase ? You can't kid a kidder ? If after those blunt answers the Gamblers (perhaps no longer BOD apologists, instead CP apologists) still would rather put their faith in people that - the letter is reported to have said, may have broken company law and have no title , no funding , only cheap talk..... then .... there really is no hope for them ! On this board we asked the pertinent questions and came to similar conclusions 18 months ago ! But the La La's would not listen ! If F31 thinks that he has heard the "real" story from the CP - does that mean he can tell the whole world exactly who EYCP are ? EYCP are supposed to be a "hedge fund" - YET they have ZERO internet presence. NO known offices - a possible caribbean address , not substantiated. Who owns this Mystery company ? What funds did the CP borrow from it? Has the CP profited from the sale - if it repays their borrowings then they have? ALL these basic questions were asked on here ages ago but the CP Apologists turn a blind eye. IF DH cannot give away the company to them surely its time to wake up and smell the coffee ?
exile
06/7/2021
08:21
f31 seems sold hook line and sinker..... He "quotes" RT saying.... "RNGG HAS TWO POTENTIAL GIANTS: NORTH DONSKOY (BLOCK SIZE 2123 SQKM) AND GASHUNSKY (BLOCK SIZE 1,835 SQKM). THERE ARE 9.1 BILLION BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENT (MOSTLY GAS: 7.4 BILLION BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENT) PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES. THIS IS CURRENTLY 80% OWNED BY MY PRIVATE COMPANY, NETOIL LIMITED" They are supposed to have had this since 2013 ? Netoil was incorporated October 2019 and was touted as "proof" of purpose.... BUT "07 Jun 2021 Accounts for a dormant company made up to 31 October 2020 Netoil Limited " It was a dormant company for over a year. It had £10k of capital and one shareholder, currently 1 director. It will be interesting to see the next set of filed accounts. Some people want to believe , so bad.....
fenners66
06/7/2021
01:09
My thoughts... The AIM MARKET is a Corrupt Market for Smart people with an high IQ to deceive the small private investor. Another AIM scam. LIke a Ponzi Scam.
satkaur1973
05/7/2021
20:11
I strongly believe John made a mistake and send the below mail to me instead of his fellow Board members. (2nd June). Whatever is the case – the answer is telling enough that no progress at all was made on any front since last year’s AGM. But 300K poorer! John: He is right We are in the same position only 300k poorer Hi John, This mail, as I wanted to give you already a personal heads-up first, on our intention to publish a communication on the various Petrel internet forums, inviting shareholders to co-sign a formal letter to the Board on the occasion of the upcoming AGM, (see attached), basically expressing our serious concerns that we still seem to be in the exact same unsatisfying situation as at the last AGM a year ago, and asking the Board to explain now with more in-depth why exactly this is the case, and why indeed no other course of action could possibly have been taken in relation to the Tamraz Group. The questions all stem from genuine concerns amongst many shareholders about our investment, and we feel this formal approach to the Board is a fair and legitimate initiative to satisfactorily address them. I trust you will accept that the various remarks and questions are nothing personal. I would appreciate it if you could indicate if you will indeed be in a position to already give some feedback to our questions ahead of the AGM (as the Board did last year), or if you have any other related feedback for that matter. Best Regards, Frans
f31
05/7/2021
19:54
David tells us that the RNGG title was depending on funding, which as you can see in my above post seems incorrect (see Fayad's answer) If David is incorrect about such a pivotal point (i.e. refusing the solution offer on that ground), than that's, well, ..... unforgivable ??
f31
05/7/2021
19:50
Teemore: I was present at that High Court sitting, and am in the posession of the Fayad's affidavit. I can promise you that every point in this affidavit is extensively backed-up with all necessary documents, all validating the points made
f31
05/7/2021
19:12
WHO are EYCP ? I tried and failed to come up with an answer 18 months ago - clearly the BOD has none either. It seems the CP has no cash. Look back at the "massive investment " that was going into the Scandinavian company that never happened.... Yet still the gamblers want to believe..... I have wondered just how people get fooled by some things...
fenners66
05/7/2021
19:09
Even 1teemore has posted something sensible and meaningful for once !
fenners66
05/7/2021
18:57
Its been messy for 20 years , the chances to exit at a profit were not taken , it seems now that the BOD are saying the same thing we have for 20 years ! If anyone could have made a profit here why did they not take it ? The "investment case" has looked threadbare for most of that 20 years !
fenners66
05/7/2021
18:55
Wow ! Got to say La La Land makes good reading tonight. What is the phrase ? You can't kid a kidder ? If after those blunt answers the Gamblers (perhaps no longer BOD apologists, instead CP apologists) still would rather put their faith in people that - the letter is reported to have said, may have broken company law and have no title , no funding , only cheap talk..... then .... there really is no hope for them ! On this board we asked the pertinent questions and came to similar conclusions 18 months ago ! But the La La's would not listen ! If F31 thinks that he has heard the "real" story from the CP - does that mean he can tell the whole world exactly who EYCP are ? EYCP are supposed to be a "hedge fund" - YET they have ZERO internet presence. NO known offices - a possible caribbean address , not substantiated. Who owns this Mystery company ? What funds did the CP borrow from it? Has the CP profited from the sale - if it repays their borrowings then they have? ALL these basic questions were asked on here ages ago but the CP Apologists turn a blind eye. IF DH cannot give away the company to them surely its time to wake up and smell the coffee ?
fenners66
05/7/2021
18:53
Just because someone said something in the HC under oath does not make it true (as lies are told in many places) and if the Tamaz Group cannot keep control off and pay for the shares that the were awarded then how are we expected to trust them. Was the CP deliberately duped by EYCP? It is difficult to see how experienced people were duped. Now the 20-25 years without producing anything worthwhile is another issue.
1teemore
05/7/2021
18:41
He has had a week to reply, in fact the Board has - all three of them. Sorry but David will do what David does. Answer only what he wants to and when he does it will put a positive spin on it. I agree, the Board does get well paid and need to show some respect to their shareholders. It's not as though they have a glowing track record!
bountyfull
05/7/2021
18:36
Ajj2003.you are probably correct but still interesting to see what unfolds.I get the gut feeling that Ghana is linked to a bid in Nigeria alongside a consortium and Pet are linked to that Ghana asset.Although the board get well paid I don't think they are just using pet as a lifestyle company.The replies to the questions have certainly provoked shareholders but he would be well aware of that before answering.For balance I don't see the Concert party's history as unblemished so the jury is still out for me.
bronislav
05/7/2021
18:29
Nothing cryptic about it bronislav, just totally false (putting it politely) compared to his own statement in the court article.
ajj2003
05/7/2021
18:24
If we look at David's answers he may have put a few heads ups in his answers albeit cryptically.As always interesting to see what unfolds.
bronislav
05/7/2021
18:20
Best at losing money LOL.
ducky fuzz
05/7/2021
18:18
Good luck Ducky - you were one of the best here.
bountyfull
05/7/2021
18:14
Hi kd .. but I've sold so now good things will happen. DF
ducky fuzz
05/7/2021
18:13
That's unusually positive for you DF! ;)
kdickson
Chat Pages: Latest  1394  1393  1392  1391  1390  1389  1388  1387  1386  1385  1384  1383  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
PET
Petrel Res..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211130 15:40:14