[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Petrel Resources Plc LSE:PET London Ordinary Share IE0001340177 ORD EUR0.0125 (CDI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 1.725 1.70 1.75 1.725 1.70 1.70 750,000 08:33:40
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.0 -0.4 -0.3 - 3

Petrel Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 34876 to 34895 of 35450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1406  1405  1404  1403  1402  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  1396  1395  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
08/7/2021
16:39
Its a point the BOD themselves have supposedly made. A point we made 15 months + ago. These people are touted to be Billionaires , yet they had to get the second tranche of shares on credit and then would have had a massive guaranteed profit - if only they would pay for them..... Does not add up. But let them spin a rumour of a free £100m asset and the turkeys can't get enough of it , no questions from them , there.
fenners66
08/7/2021
15:51
Elmfield, I can't see the relevance of your last post to the matter on hand. But I presume you are talking in general and not about me. Because if so, I can assure you that I am in Petrel easily as long as you are.
f31
08/7/2021
15:31
I am very circumspect of the aim of unknown posters on any forum. I was just thinking aloud Mr Watson.
elmfield
08/7/2021
15:19
Palace Pete, Yes, I myself find it amazing that for whatever reasons they have to do so, some people prefer the outcome of a most likely loss of their investment as opposed to at least have a realistic shot at some recovery. It could be - and I suspect it often is - out of long standing loyalty to the Board. Unfortunately the Board has shown little loyalty to us (and them!). They don't feel the need to explain themselves, they are simply ignoring us, when long-term shareholders ask them for clarification on what seemed to be incorrect information within their formal response to our letter. Still, everybody has the right to an own opinion.
f31
08/7/2021
14:57
Another 25 years of fa then.
palace pete
08/7/2021
14:25
We all want this company to succeed but I would have serious concern placing any credibility in Tarmaz who in his first action broke company law and in the process tied up a large percentage of company shares and now unable to resolve the issue even after 18 months. There is an old saying :'fool me once, shame on you';fool me twice,shame on me. I go with elmfield.
1teemore
08/7/2021
14:24
Elmfield: It is important to get the facts right, for people to make up their minds. When you say "So far he has achieved nothing except break company laws", that's contradictory to the facts? To name just a few of his achievements: * Acquisition of development rights and equity ownership positions in Turkmenistan’s Blocks 1 and II * Origination and development of the Baku-TbilisiCeyhan (BTC) pipeline (1 million barrels per day) * Acquisition and ownership of Lockheed AircraftCompany, Trans Mediterranean Airlines (TMA), Middle East Airlines (MEA) * Origination and development of the SuezMediterranean (SUMED) pipeline (2.5 million barrels per day). If you are happy that this Board will achieve better than Roger Tamraz than that's your perfectly good right - but don't bring invalid arguments
f31
08/7/2021
14:18
Out of the frying pan.... into the thermonuclear reactor... ? It seems odd to side with the existing BOD vs the turkeys on the other thread , but after 20+ years of failure you know what you are getting , more of the same but adherence to the rules and regs , no breaking of company laws. After the purported letter from the BOD can the turkeys be as sure of even that small mercy ? Fair enough they are fed up with failure , but don't compound it. This has turned out never to have been a long term "investment" its only playing the rumours etc. Who would have thought that 15-20 years ago ? Oh yeah , we did.......
fenners66
08/7/2021
14:14
Thank you. It is extremely difficult for all but Tamraz has a lot to prove to me anyway. Let's see if something sensible develops but on past record I am not holding my breath while waiting, become good at waiting.
elmfield
08/7/2021
14:09
Sensible position to take hawki4
kdickson
08/7/2021
14:06
I’m also inclined to agree with Elmfield for now at least. Waiting to see what the AGM brings.
hawki4
08/7/2021
14:01
elmfield, thanks for your response. I respect your opinions and its good for others to see its not all a one way flow.
kdickson
08/7/2021
13:38
I know what you mean Sabine but it is what it is I'm afraid.
kdickson
08/7/2021
13:34
Even though I feel a bit sorry for David Horgan, as he seems to be driven into a corner because of his principles and he does have a point re. the staying within the law, I feel we're going to end up with nothing. A change is due, so my votes are: 1) b 2) a 3) a
sabine4
08/7/2021
13:32
Sorry I got excited thinking that at long last we have the opportunity to get shot of this bunch of muppets.
gulable
08/7/2021
13:10
Thank you kdDefinitely 1b 2a 3a for meGla,about time we had something to cheer here, but will make do with the football for now!
susiebe
08/7/2021
13:09
The La La Land turkeys are voting for Xmas .... Soooo Funny! They don"t even know what Xmas means for turkeys They think they will be receiving presents no doubt - £100 m worth perhaps ?!! Just 90 days away?
fenners66
08/7/2021
13:04
Thanks Gulable. You'll only be counted once though! ;)
kdickson
08/7/2021
13:01
Definitely 1B, 2A, 3A.
gulable
08/7/2021
13:01
Definitely 1B, 2A, 3A.
gulable
Chat Pages: Latest  1406  1405  1404  1403  1402  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  1396  1395  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
PET
Petrel Res..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211130 16:50:22