Parallel Media Share Discussion Threads

[knigel] 30/12/2015 16:24

Someone has :-)

[sigora] 30/12/2015 16:23

someone kicked this dog ?

[sigora] 24/12/2015 09:21

yeh make this dog move

[littlemadam] 24/12/2015 09:19

Anyone want to send DC a very special Christmas message?

[eezymunny] 23/12/2015 11:13

Yes, well, I think very very differently DD.

I think PCM exists so that if PAA goes to the wall the Harwood/Teamrock/DC tie-up can continue unaffected by a PAA administration. Eff all for PAA shareholders and DC can carry on with a modestly profitable music biz.

On a more positive note DC is prepared to lend a bit more to PAA to keep the lights on. I guess he wouldn't do that unless he felt he could get creditors (and as I've said before I think the Euro Tour is the big one) to write-off a huge sum. If then golf rights can be sold off or Euro Tour forgives the 2014 The Championship debacle and allows PAA to sponsor events in future who knows, maybe PAA survives and indeed prospers. Can't see it myself. I predict you're wiped out in 2016 but I certainly might be wrong.

[dusseldorf] 23/12/2015 10:28

EezyMunny - Believe me, I question why PAA exists a lot of the time - let alone PCM. PCM is a shield to development costs so that PAA does not have to report and bear them - perhaps avoiding further dilution. It is also perhaps a shield to the progress being made between PAA and Teamrock. One thing is for sure, PAA and Harwood (Oryx, Chris Mills, Timothy Sturm) are working in concert at present which also gives me reassurance given the latter has sunk £1m to get near 30% of a listed company as has plenty of cash and experience.

[eezymunny] 22/12/2015 16:04

I think you need to keep considering why PCM even exists DD. I suspect it wouldn't if PAA wasn't so close to the brink. Don't you?

[dusseldorf] 22/12/2015 15:48

..you may also wish to highlight that the revenue is not actually a hard pre-condition, indeed, PAA could acquire PCM 'tomorrow' for £1.

[dusseldorf] 22/12/2015 15:45

EezyMunny - you should also highlight 'for clarity' that if revenues from PCM to PAA reach £500k or above PAA continues to have the right to acquire 100% PCM for a nominal sum of £1 from DC (via Luna) for a maximum period of 6 months after the revenue target is reached.

[dusseldorf] 22/12/2015 15:28

I see PAA living up to it's reputation of a day traders graveyard. Buy in the morning, sell at loss a few hours later - will never understand those day traders who obviously keep coming back.

A further expansion of the PAA/Team rock association, perhaps a reverse is becoming more likely, PAA needs to decide what to do with golf first though....

[loverat] 22/12/2015 12:21

Clock them in and clock them out.

Another RNS sold into.

[hh power] 17/12/2015 03:27

Loverat
16 Dec'15 - 11:39 - 1295 of 1302 0 0
Have you ever wondered why many people here and elsewhere may not have listened to you?


I'm sure that's a question you should ask of yourself every single day.

Except for your army of fake IDs, the only people who agree with you or compliment you are the ones who are new, the ones who are stupid and the ones who are lying.

[dusseldorf] 16/12/2015 15:14

Team Rock appears to be one of Oryx (Harwood)'s only unlisted portfolio holdings:


Could Harwoods interest be to create a listed music vehicle? (unlikely, but just throwing it out there). Harwoods involvement came around the same time Timothy Sturm was appointed to Team Rock, which is when they appointed him to PAA.

[loverat] 16/12/2015 15:01

Well, the moral of the above story is that posters here could have gambled their money by giving it to British Bear to invest 10 years ago and made a good return - rather than gambling it directly on PAA and making a thumping loss.

You live and learn.

[eezymunny] 16/12/2015 12:49

No. I started with c. £100k. Decided to stop work and win or lose it all. Never worked again. Lived off the profits. Paid off the mortgage. Never put in another penny. I made £40k profit on one trade early on. It was just luck in hindsight - I had no idea what I was doing. Without that I'd probably still be working today. I'd say it was 2-3 years before I'd worked out how easy this can be. No luck required. Just common sense, buying the right companies at the right price etc. Who said anything about blue chips? I've made most of my money in the decent AIM stocks - where the bargains appear much more often.

As I said b4 why would Harwood etc use PAA as a music biz vehicle? They could do it without the horrific £3m liabilities as a starting point. Perhaps with DC's new thing (that PAA own precisely NONE of!).

I've always said there's a possible out if golf rights are sold off. Just think the hole is probably too deep now even if that happens (can't see it anyway).

Good luck.

[dusseldorf] 16/12/2015 12:32

EezyMunny your £100k start may be true (no need to answer but I assume you don't or didn't have kids at that stage! moneyeaters), but it remaining your only base is claptrap, I'm sure you fed substantially more cash than that into new investments over your earning years - and you never touched that pot as year in year out you made money right? - even when the market collapsed. So now you state your reported profits are fabricated too 'sometimes much higher' and not actually the values you 'report' pah - I assume the same goes for your losses...makes your effort to report worthless.

Littlemadam referred to others opinions because we have had historically closer contact with the MD, and broad timing updates were more regular than RNS's when there was radio silence. Time will tell, but whilst the price is low you will of course claim to be the all seeing eye. Should the price recover and business swing, I'm sure you'll also claim to have called it.

Investing money and making money slowly on profitable, dividend paying growing blue chips in a rising market is not a science, it's something a monkey (or a parrot) could do picking stocks at random, if not better - this has been proven - I leave that to the fund managers in my pension. Statistically, you could have chosen 8 out of 10 stocks at random on aim and they'd be 80%+ down or bust and also been correct - there are no prizes here on AIM for calling short.

I've performed a very similar role to you on FITB called it down from 22p to sub 3p (now just over 1p?), it was not difficult, it takes minutes of analysis. The key is if you believe in an eventual recovery, timing on purchases and how long-term you really are. Like I say, I believe Harwood and Chris Mills/Timothy Sturm will help see this to recovery, be it through partnerships or some form of reverse - the focus on music.

[eezymunny] 16/12/2015 12:11

I post on these boards to try to help people. When I point out very obvious flaws in their bull cases they don't like it. That's up to them.

[eezymunny] 16/12/2015 12:07

DD I imply nothing of the sort. Everyone should DYOR and weigh up all the facts for themselves. Problem is they read bullish (or bearish) claptrap and BELIEVE it! Look at liddlemadam still seeking your opinion after all the disasters here!

I started with c. £100k 16 years ago, no city contacts and a basic accounting knowledge. Anybody could do it. No need for a silver spoon etc. Look at Lord Lee - just bought good companies at good valuations and now has a £4.5m ISA pot.

My posted EEZYMUNNNY trades are based on a £100k starting pot. In reality some of my position sizes are a very big multiple of those posted.

Your comment "Put simply, you cannot make millions investing in profitable companies unless your 'base' for investment is already several hundred thousand 'disposable'." is, quite simply, more of your usual claptrap my friend!

[loverat] 16/12/2015 11:39

This is another thing which makes me laugh. 'If you listened to me, you'd saved yourself 95%' etc etc

Have you ever wondered why many people here and elsewhere may not have listened to you?

Could it be because you come across as aggressive and rubbish the views of others and people think you are a deramper?

If you only invest in safe companies, and tell people this, they probably conclude you are a dishonest deramper because why else would you be on the PAA thread?

As I said, there are a few good posters on these boards. People listen to them because they know they are honest and objective. People like you might save the odd person money - but more often than not, the way you come across and tone only serves to muddy the waters and makes gaining reliable information for new investors/traders more onerous.

In that respect you are more misleading than those you are accusing.

[dusseldorf] 16/12/2015 11:38

EezyMunny - on the contrary you infer that people should instead take your advice, as you are 'professional', which IS actually illegal.

The majority of people who claim to have made millions on shares come from two backgrounds:
a) Those with family money (money makes money, that's simple)
b) Those who got lucky and spent time in the city (finance) getting well paid for a job pretty much everyone could do given training

Put simply, you cannot make millions investing in profitable companies unless your 'base' for investment is already several hundred thousand 'disposable'.

I congratulate you on getting to a position where you had enough spare capital to invest in a broad range of companies and seemingly not be working - be it a - or b. However, based on your posted trades (which I saw a while ago) in no way are sufficient to maintain either my current outgoings or indeed make you a millionaire.

[loverat] 16/12/2015 11:31

That's the problem. His analysis is not forensic - far from it in fact.

The MO is to write articles off the back of the research of others or simply to throw mud at a selection of companies and wait for some to fail. In a falling market where most companies go bust, not really very difficult, is it?

There are a handful of very good posters (usually bearish) on this site however whose research is second to none. When you read the posts you can see the analysis is both forensic and objective (ie no deramping/vested interests)

TW is certainly not heroic. If you think that I suggest this displays your gullible side.