We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.00 | -2.00% | 49.00 | 49.00 | 49.05 | 50.60 | 47.70 | 50.00 | 9,340,370 | 16:35:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 13k | -11.55M | -0.0103 | -47.62 | 557.88M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/1/2023 19:02 | Cor blimey, guv! The share chart that continues to give. The death cross still in place and working out nicely. Long term trendlines smashed. After the large fall from about 80p to 40p investors might need to watch the bearish (descending) flag in the current chart. It presages a fall down to 10p. I wouldn't thunk it possible. Commercial or not, cash raise or not, 23 billion or not, flare or not, the share is price is going one way. free stock charts from uk.advfn.com Be careful. | helpfull | |
19/1/2023 18:58 | Where has Everyone gone!? I’m still holding, added and never yet sold any. | bodroll | |
19/1/2023 18:34 | Where have all the Oh so vocal shorts gone !!!! | olderwiser2 | |
19/1/2023 16:37 | FifthElementInvestin 0 2 0 AVCT still going up and BigBazz and Truants short still getting smashed. PANR rising now also. You have to feel sorry for them. Swen is that you??? | bigdazzlerreturns2 | |
19/1/2023 15:56 | The Bull claims to have lost £250,000 on Meldex "The Meldex Fraud(Moderated) - ADVFN - Free Bulletin Board" | gemstar2 | |
19/1/2023 15:52 | And AVCT along with Truant 😂😂 | padamster | |
19/1/2023 14:57 | The Bull lost Megabucks on Meldex and Prm Very angry Best filtered | gemstar2 | |
19/1/2023 14:41 | Your response makes no sense and yet you have four thumbs up because you said deleberate attempt to mislead Sheeesh | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 12:37 | If that is indeed the case, which I very much doubt, the claims of the well being a failure are a deliberate attempt to mislead. | rabito79 | |
19/1/2023 11:08 | No bears do understand the complexity of bringing oil well online. That is why we shorted it from a billion pound market cap. I would argue that most of the bulls here do not understand the complexity of being oil wells online. They believe it is as simple as flicking a switch and pumping out 2500bopd | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 11:04 | How’s daytime TV today Bull? (He posts during the adverts). Quality. | references | |
19/1/2023 10:10 | There's an equal amount of conjecture to your assumption. The reality is many things are more complicated than the bears would have us think. Indeed the bears gloss over complexity to their advantage. Bringing a well online post a multistage fraccing operation is a complex procedure which is not understood by the vast majority and therefore allows the bears to point to the wrong conclusions.It's easy to call people liars and frauds, it takes a bit more work to speak to others in the industry who have worked with management and can vouch for their integrity.It's easy to say the flare is burning diesel. It's much harder to make an estimate of gas being burned based on experience and use this to estimate oil rates based on a stated GOR assumption.It's easy to rubbish experts, (Britain's tired of experts) but it's much harder to actually become an expert or indeed seek out expert opinion in addition to that released by the company.The list could go on. Ironically the only effort I have seen by the bears is the falsified document shared by Alex Stahel and promoted by Fraser Perring et al to support their shorts. Of course it's also easy to say there is no coordinated short attack, I am sure it's just coincidence Fraser Perry, Josh Young, Carson Block were all copied on the tweet. | rabito79 | |
19/1/2023 10:00 | I thought the reason for choking was to get off better? | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 08:10 | Now spitting out your dummy because you cannot handle your views being challenged | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 08:05 | ffs, am not going to respond to your idiocy any longer. Filtered! | forwood | |
19/1/2023 08:01 | Ahhhh you gonna jump on the Padamster bandwagon now with the whole short cabal, paid derampers nonsense lol Usually signs of desperation | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 07:56 | Complete denial of reality Bully. And to be clear, I don't know for a fact that they were under orders to cut costs, but that is the most likely inference. Perhaps they didn't think the leases worth it, I don't know, but reports at the time suggested they were worth something and maybe it was just a bad decision on their part. But you have also been told that producing isn't their business. And another thing. It seems to me this is part of the short script. I wonder who wrote it? | forwood | |
19/1/2023 07:15 | You’re, not your. Lots of ‘differentR “Most of the time the easiest answer is the correct answer” An easy answer would be that the same individual is posting under multiple usernames. | probabilityofsuccess | |
19/1/2023 06:53 | So your claiming for a fact that you know Halliburton gave up their share of the leases because they were under orders to cut costs. Utter tosh. Oh and I would assume most of Halliburton's losses were write downs as opposed to cash calls. Once again bulls unable to face the reality of a situation. Halliburton assessed the leases and did not even feel they were worth drilling. It is literally as simple as that | thebull8 | |
19/1/2023 06:42 | That's the problem with your thesis you prefer easy to fact. | mlf51 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions