ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

PANR Pantheon Resources Plc

49.00
-1.00 (-2.00%)
27 Jan 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pantheon Resources Plc LSE:PANR London Ordinary Share GB00B125SX82 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.00 -2.00% 49.00 49.00 49.05 50.60 47.70 50.00 9,340,370 16:35:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Natural Gas Liquids 13k -11.55M -0.0103 -47.62 557.88M
Pantheon Resources Plc is listed in the Natural Gas Liquids sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PANR. The last closing price for Pantheon Resources was 50p. Over the last year, Pantheon Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 14.20p to 51.00p.

Pantheon Resources currently has 1,115,754,480 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Pantheon Resources is £557.88 million. Pantheon Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -47.62.

Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 44251 to 44270 of 78650 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1778  1777  1776  1775  1774  1773  1772  1771  1770  1769  1768  1767  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/1/2023
19:02
Cor blimey, guv!

The share chart that continues to give. The death cross still in place and working out nicely. Long term trendlines smashed. After the large fall from about 80p to 40p investors might need to watch the bearish (descending) flag in the current chart. It presages a fall down to 10p. I wouldn't thunk it possible. Commercial or not, cash raise or not, 23 billion or not, flare or not, the share is price is going one way.


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com


Be careful.

helpfull
19/1/2023
18:58
Where has Everyone gone!?
I’m still holding, added and never yet sold any.

bodroll
19/1/2023
18:34
Where have all the Oh so vocal shorts gone !!!!
olderwiser2
19/1/2023
16:37
FifthElementInvesting18 Jan '23 - 11:12 - 1754 of 1818
0 2 0
AVCT still going up and BigBazz and Truants short still getting smashed.

PANR rising now also.

You have to feel sorry for them.




Swen is that you???

bigdazzlerreturns2
19/1/2023
15:56
The Bull claims to have lost £250,000 on Meldex

"The Meldex Fraud(Moderated) - ADVFN - Free Bulletin Board"

gemstar2
19/1/2023
15:52
And AVCT along with Truant 😂😂
padamster
19/1/2023
14:57
The Bull lost Megabucks on Meldex and Prm
Very angry
Best filtered

gemstar2
19/1/2023
14:41
Your response makes no sense and yet you have four thumbs up because you said deleberate attempt to mislead Sheeesh
thebull8
19/1/2023
12:37
If that is indeed the case, which I very much doubt, the claims of the well being a failure are a deliberate attempt to mislead.
rabito79
19/1/2023
11:08
No bears do understand the complexity of bringing oil well online. That is why we shorted it from a billion pound market cap. I would argue that most of the bulls here do not understand the complexity of being oil wells online. They believe it is as simple as flicking a switch and pumping out 2500bopd
thebull8
19/1/2023
11:04
How’s daytime TV today Bull? (He posts during the adverts). Quality.
references
19/1/2023
10:10
There's an equal amount of conjecture to your assumption. The reality is many things are more complicated than the bears would have us think. Indeed the bears gloss over complexity to their advantage. Bringing a well online post a multistage fraccing operation is a complex procedure which is not understood by the vast majority and therefore allows the bears to point to the wrong conclusions.It's easy to call people liars and frauds, it takes a bit more work to speak to others in the industry who have worked with management and can vouch for their integrity.It's easy to say the flare is burning diesel. It's much harder to make an estimate of gas being burned based on experience and use this to estimate oil rates based on a stated GOR assumption.It's easy to rubbish experts, (Britain's tired of experts) but it's much harder to actually become an expert or indeed seek out expert opinion in addition to that released by the company.The list could go on. Ironically the only effort I have seen by the bears is the falsified document shared by Alex Stahel and promoted by Fraser Perring et al to support their shorts. Of course it's also easy to say there is no coordinated short attack, I am sure it's just coincidence Fraser Perry, Josh Young, Carson Block were all copied on the tweet.
rabito79
19/1/2023
10:00
I thought the reason for choking was to get off better?
thebull8
19/1/2023
08:10
Now spitting out your dummy because you cannot handle your views being challenged
thebull8
19/1/2023
08:05
ffs, am not going to respond to your idiocy any longer. Filtered!
forwood
19/1/2023
08:01
Ahhhh you gonna jump on the Padamster bandwagon now with the whole short cabal, paid derampers nonsense lol Usually signs of desperation
thebull8
19/1/2023
07:56
Complete denial of reality Bully. And to be clear, I don't know for a fact that they were under orders to cut costs, but that is the most likely inference. Perhaps they didn't think the leases worth it, I don't know, but reports at the time suggested they were worth something and maybe it was just a bad decision on their part. But you have also been told that producing isn't their business.

And another thing. It seems to me this is part of the short script. I wonder who wrote it?

forwood
19/1/2023
07:15
You’re, not your. Lots of ‘differentR17; usernames seem to continue to struggle with the difference thebull.

“Most of the time the easiest answer is the correct answer”

An easy answer would be that the same individual is posting under multiple usernames.

probabilityofsuccess
19/1/2023
06:53
So your claiming for a fact that you know Halliburton gave up their share of the leases because they were under orders to cut costs. Utter tosh. Oh and I would assume most of Halliburton's losses were write downs as opposed to cash calls. Once again bulls unable to face the reality of a situation. Halliburton assessed the leases and did not even feel they were worth drilling. It is literally as simple as that
thebull8
19/1/2023
06:42
That's the problem with your thesis you prefer easy to fact.
mlf51
Chat Pages: Latest  1778  1777  1776  1775  1774  1773  1772  1771  1770  1769  1768  1767  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock