ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

PANR Pantheon Resources Plc

35.20
1.60 (4.76%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pantheon Resources Plc LSE:PANR London Ordinary Share GB00B125SX82 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  1.60 4.76% 35.20 34.95 35.30 36.00 33.85 34.40 3,443,597 16:35:22
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Natural Gas Liquids 804k -1.45M -0.0016 -219.69 318.88M
Pantheon Resources Plc is listed in the Natural Gas Liquids sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PANR. The last closing price for Pantheon Resources was 33.60p. Over the last year, Pantheon Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 10.10p to 45.50p.

Pantheon Resources currently has 907,206,399 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Pantheon Resources is £318.88 million. Pantheon Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -219.69.

Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 38451 to 38464 of 60175 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1543  1542  1541  1540  1539  1538  1537  1536  1535  1534  1533  1532  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/2/2023
13:21
youngbaz: the shorts are a little like flies. When they're in the kitchen, I open the french windows to let them fly out. If they don't buzz off, I might get the spray out and zap 'em!
forwood
27/2/2023
12:57
MADD -We're singing off the same hymn sheet I think!I totally agree about refuting the misinformation etc so prevalent on here, and that it's totally off putting for any potential investor. I was applauding Forwood's diligence in pursuing the refutation. My concern related to tone and language. Sadly Swendab, to whom I'm hugely grateful for initiating the Guild, is now also guilty- as in 'see Matron' type comments.
youngbaz
27/2/2023
12:13
Aaahhh JakNife - a recognition of the facts of the original posts from your side then, you now acknowledge that contrarians post included an *if* statement. I accept your (albeit implict) apology, many thanks 👍.

All the evidence of the content of posts is there for everyone to read. Despite what you want people to believe I said (with your added emotive ‘rocket’ language), they can read it for themselves.

In 10 days let’s revisit shall we and if you can prove that all the evidence I presented (some of which I even shared with you by IM) was false then you can call me (like you did contrarian) a ‘conspiracy posting moron’ all you like. If you can’t, then perhaps some may think you will have been hoist by your own petard - see you on 13th March 😀

probabilityofsuccess
27/2/2023
12:03
Tick tock tick tock Oh dear Scot. Jumping aboard the desperate train. Schlumberger must only be operating the data room because they have seen something! So massive that they've told all their contact within the oil and gas industry who have started hoovering up those shares. I mean, look at all the TR1 notifications.... Or. They have been paid (well) to do a job? Triggered
thebull8
27/2/2023
11:57
Forwood -Your #3046 is an excellent, calm, well-reasoned assessment and summary of where we are now, where we've been and of what's happening and why on this BB. I do admire your patience and diligence in responding to the naysayers on here - I just wouldn't be bothered. The one small criticism I might have is that you do occasionally stoop to their level with a bit of name calling - thankfully absent from #3046. A polite response with an absence of ad hominem stuff always works best. Frankly I'm amazed at the sheer volume of childish, offensive, banter on here. When I first started investigating the case for buying in here it was virtually absent - in its place were several helpful posts, often quite lengthy, outlining the case for doing so whilst also referencing any potential negatives that should be taken into account. That's what should be the raison d'etre of a BB surely? Sadly there's so much irrelevance for any potential investor to wade through before reaching any useful meat that they're likely to move on elsewhere. Whilst the Guild remains virtually free of such useless material it is of course impossible for any newbie to post a genuine question there. Oh well!
youngbaz
27/2/2023
11:37
Cor blimey, guv!

There's nothing in the chart that says £2+

But it is indicating a fall to 10p is likely.

Peeps have been warned. The bearish, ascending flag has been around for a few months. Learn from the past. Ignore at your peril.


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com


Be careful.

helpfull
27/2/2023
11:22
Nice try JakNife! You know I was correct and I even messaged you a copy of the Ibkr data sheet confirming the margin rates (which you were disputing at the time). You literally make stuff up!

The rate as at today remains at 100% FOR BOTH LONGS AND SHORTS according to the Ibkr data sheets.

The tweet spoke about the mcap staying above $500M over 10 days………….has it??

If it hasn’t, why do you expect margin to be reinstated and why do you think that proves you ‘correct’;? I said at the time that there was no point revisiting the debate in 10 days because it assumed the mcap would stay above $500M.

Your understanding of the point being discussed seems to be pretty poor and what you did (as can be seen by all the previous posts……….unless of course you delete/amend them) was start to try to argue different points, because your views were rebutted by facts on the substantive points.

probabilityofsuccess
27/2/2023
11:17
Raising funds after successful flow rates will be welcomed by the market 😊. It’s what listed companies do to grow - just thought I’d let you know that bit of common sense
padamster
27/2/2023
11:12
Share price dropped from 5 to 4 ahead of the placing.
michaelsadvfn
27/2/2023
10:51
Some great points there Helpful - I think you are right the blockage was significant and still 550 barrels of profit generating hydrocarbon fluids!You and your friends are getting yourselves into some serious muddy waters here - get out whilst you can.
bryproj
27/2/2023
10:49
Share price rising ahead of the placing.

Hang on a minute....shares don’t do that.

michaelsadvfn
27/2/2023
10:48
Unhelpful, bull, Jaknife, truant etc please keep posting as you make the stock go up

Be very very careful

padamster
27/2/2023
10:36
Cor blimey, guv!

Can't argue against an "over £2 a share" prediction.

Or over a £1,600,000,000 company valuation.

Especially if that company has income from the 200 bopd it is producing.

Does that target include a few cash raises?

How many director sales are allowed for?

My target is 10p. At 10p the company would be worth £80 million. That's too much. But what do I know. I thought 80p was too much. I thought 123p was too much (so did the directors, and sold). Perhaps more than £2 is acceptable?

But 200 bopd is a trickle in comparison. But that's reality. And we all know reality sucks.

Be careful.

helpfull
27/2/2023
10:31
You talk about trading as an emotive state.

That’s where you will go wrong and become attached.

Trading can never be about emotions that will lead to the poor house.

bigdazzlerreturns2
Chat Pages: Latest  1543  1542  1541  1540  1539  1538  1537  1536  1535  1534  1533  1532  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock