Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[probabilityofsuccess] 14/7/2022 19:01

Pro - you obviously didn’t keep records of the original posts you made, and then lost in editing. Unfortunate!

[madd_rip] 14/7/2022 18:23

In other words you lied in them or wrote defamatory statements. Gotcha.

[pro_s2009] 14/7/2022 17:49

POS, I would say "No". I may have removed posts if some people have taken then out of context or miscontrued their meaning, but to change a post based on a trading positon........no.

[37bodie] 14/7/2022 17:24

Hi Rabito & Swendab,

Thanks for answering my query, I had a general idea it was something like that but couldn't quite believe it was possible or worth making the effort for. I read the Gary Carp stuff last week but to me that was someone with a one-off vendetta against one company done out of spite.

Before today, with Pro it seemed to be a few companies as if a full time occupation, as a way of making money, hence my confusion.

[probabilityofsuccess] 14/7/2022 16:43

Here’s a question/discussion for you Pro - have you ever edited a post to fundamentally change its meaning, to ensure it aligns with your new trading position?

That’s an answer that 99% of individuals would be able (and happy) to answer as “No”. Are you prepared to go on record in writing on this bb to confirm your answer to the above question is “No”?

[pro_s2009] 14/7/2022 16:34

No Rabito.....nobody knows whether it will fail or work until its tested. A question within a question would be, perhaps yes, were they at the time concerned it might fail and so decided to drill Talitha as a back up plan to have something else in the bag before returning to Alkaid ?

These are all questions, not as you wrongly state "insinuating".........to question something is very much needed, only when you question can you come up with potential answers with which to then question more..........

[rabito79] 14/7/2022 16:26

Pro, you insinuated they had been avoiding doing it because they knew it would fail. That's why you have deleted the post.When I asked a simple question about your change of stance, you accused me of baiting.Ah yes that well known oil terminology 'keeping the flow open' which you mistakenly typed as 'keeping the fracks open'. Have worked in the oil industry for over 20 years and can honestly say I have never heard the term 'enough pressure to keep the flow open', mainly because it's clearly gibberish you made up after being called out on your technical theory for the SMD blockage.Now exactly who is the child here?

[pro_s2009] 14/7/2022 16:19

Absolutely Rabito when you say "out of context".........

I asked the question, and we are allowed to ask questions........the question was.......why did they go off and drill Talitha and not return to flow test Alkaid with urgency originally ?

Fair question !

Your comment about reservoir pressure and flow was yes, taken out of context. I was referring to reservoir pressure and subsequent flow after frac, you mistook at as meaning reservoir pressure was keeping the reservoir "fracs" open, whereas I was on about keeping the flow open and flowing........which is of course different.