We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Bear Plc | NTBR | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 58.50 | 08:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.50 | 58.50 | 58.50 | 58.50 | 58.50 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| SUPPORT SERVICES |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 05/12/2023 10:36 by sbs They need to wait for TR-1s from the investors.Companies don't usually find out for themselves. |
Posted at 29/11/2023 08:51 by sbs Interesting task to decide formula.I think they have to give everyone at least 35.6%, but they put in a comment about not leaving uneconomic small shareholding, which gives some flexibility. Figures are: 5,000,000 to be cancelled 7,831,399 tendered 4,736,717 tendered by JB 3,094,682 not tendered by JB Average cancellation: 63.85% - would leave JB 1,712,533. If everyone else gets their 35.6%, and the rest to JB, this would leave 785k for him - still a sizeable overhang, with 21.4k/day monthly average trades. Alternatively, give all the PIs 100%, leaving JB 2.8m (still better for him than 35.6% reduction). He can then sell on the market at a lower price (notionally in compensation for all the trouble he caused) and the now cash rich PIs and long term shareholders can pick up the overhang at a good price, with press coverage on NTBR's success and low price bringing in new investors to pick up all the overhang. |
Posted at 18/8/2023 10:13 by knigel Probably buying ahead of going ex-dividend next week. However, why do investors buy a single share…? |
Posted at 12/7/2023 13:52 by zangdook Broker – every AIM company is required to retain a broker at all times. The broker – who must be a London Stock Exchange Member Firm – acts at the main interface with the stock market, assessing market conditions, the demand for your company's shares and actively marketing them to investors. |
Posted at 05/5/2023 10:29 by zangdook royaloakI've been using IG's vanilla share dealing platform for a while with very few complaints but I wouldn't mind getting into L2. Is it one of those services for which they require you to prove that you're a "sophisticated investor"? - last time they asked me about that I must have been too honest and they decided I was still a naive lad... |
Posted at 03/5/2023 16:01 by royaloak Market Makers getting gazumped with smaller investors buying in the auctions. |
Posted at 27/4/2023 09:08 by zangdook Does anyone know what sort of investor N B-D is? Just wondering if he's building up to doing something, with or without Baryshnik, or if he's just investing some cash. |
Posted at 05/4/2023 08:28 by tiswas The share price was 60-80p when they were making these sorts of numbers previously, although the latest proposed dividend is a bit higher. No reason it can not get back there, although I doubt it will be in a straight line.I think the statement is an admission of "we dont know what we are doing or how we are going to change things" which ties in with my earlier thoughts that buying in was a mistake. If increased investor engagement extends to a broker note then we might go even higher. If the payout is 50% of earnings then I don't see why it won't be maintained. |
Posted at 08/6/2022 13:25 by graham1ty Is almost three years since the 72p tender offer, followed by the Board coup.It is now seven months since the last trading update ( given in the November interims). The Board continue to treat investors with contempt…̷ |
Posted at 25/9/2021 11:23 by jkashton I think the board changes reflect a concern about how the company is structured and ultimately managed under the group umbrella. As highlighted elsewhere the compensation paid to the underlying operating companies MD's is a much higher proportion of Operating Costs for those Subs than is normal and I assumed has reflected an element of original owner retention in the payments. While the Group Structure clearly doesn't look top heavy or expensive there are two roles now that are unnecessary and I would question what payments will made to Howard Barry Gold(Life President) and Steven Mark Roberts(Chairman Emeritus), also the longevity of those roles needs to be questioned as they structurally out of kilter with a company where its market cap is only £9.33 million. The big issue from my persepctive as investor with a disproportionate part of my Sipp held with NTBR is that they purchased H.Peel for £2.9 million and then wrote of most of this in the recent accounts under a goodwill impairment charge. While H Peel is clearly not a zero value company it does reflect a purchase(first in 10 years) that was badly timed and badly assessed by way of underlying value of assets. My hope is that Baryshnik prompts an internal review of the costs / revenues / profits at the subsidiary levels and puts in place a much more sustainable structure reflective of the size of NTBR and the Subs and also does engage more directly with the Analysts such that we can get transparency against the share proce aka as a group against the sum of the individual parts as my fear is that the Subs being a part of the NTBR group benefit only in the provision of underlying Financial and Organisational Services and never get close to cross ell opportunities or leveraging organisational and opertaional structures across multiple Subs outside of the light touch Group Structure. I had high hopes when I bought into NTBR but personally I think the Group Management and Structure(not the Subs) has let Investors down to date. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
