We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Neo Energy Metals Plc | NEO | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.80 | 0.725 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Industry Sector |
---|
GENERAL FINANCIAL |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 20/1/2025 09:42 by darmz It's a shame allThis profit floating around and no one is buying Neo. I'm all out until sentiment changes |
Posted at 08/1/2025 10:11 by bladderman Neo pump and dumpers have vanished now |
Posted at 30/12/2024 16:17 by whoppy So a company with a £14.29Bn resource has a value of £3Bn.NEO is mis-valued. Neo Energy Metals Chief Executive Officer Sean Heathcote said, "The completion of the integrated valuation of the entire Beisa Uranium and Gold Project will go a long way to illustrate the sheer scale and significance of the Project in the global uranium market. To provide a simple resource comparison, the intrinsic in-situ value of probably the world's largest undeveloped uranium deposit, the Rook I project (including Arrow and any closely accessible resources) owned by Canadian listed NexGen Energy Ltd (NXE: Market Capitalisation of £3.08 Bn) is £14.29 Bn at the prevailing uranium spot price, on a deposit that is still in the process of permitting and development. Whereas, the Beisa Uranium and Gold Project has an intrinsic in-situ value of £6.52 Bn for uranium and £11.17 Bn for the gold resources (Total £17.69 Bn), with immediately stoppable ore, and deposits that are all accessible from an existing fully permitted multi-shaft complex and process plant that only requires relatively minor upgrade and refurbishment, compared to the billions of dollars of capital investment required for Rook I. "We look forward to sharing the results of the independent asset valuations with the market, to show the true value being created by the Company in the uranium resource space." |
Posted at 30/12/2024 10:21 by ssrover from Myles just nowAnother good RNS from #NEO, and I think the share price will really shift northwards at some point in the near future. Public comps analysis clearly points to it being chronically undervalued. As I wrote in the NEO TG group a couple of weeks ago (oddly, resultantly generating a load of angst from shareholders in said group), a positive catalyst would be for NEO to get another well-known insto (esp. uranium specialists) to take the £2m at 0.75p, that AUO have/had promised to subscribe for. A good cash injection in the immediate-term, with the knowledge that there is demand for the stock from specialist instos and with the comfort that the shareholder register is being tightened up... I think would work wonders for the share price |
Posted at 30/12/2024 09:59 by ssrover That NEO Energy RNS is as good as it gets. They’re doing a valuation on all their assets by Q1 2025.They compare themselves to £3bn listed Canadian company, whose resources in situ are valued at £14bn. Neo have £17bn in situ, and won’t be doing any equity dilution. This is the stock for 2025 which huge upside from todays £10-12m market cap. EASY £50-100m incoming. |
Posted at 17/12/2024 10:44 by mr paul b Sibanye Stillwater wouldn't partner up with NEO without some serious due diligence, Watch this space .. |
Posted at 09/12/2024 15:00 by whoppy Those shares are not hitting the market. Sibanye is a strategic NEO partner/shareholder. Through NEO, they now have ownership of Beisa North and South aswell as Beisa Central. |
Posted at 09/12/2024 13:29 by whoppy Sibanye will take a big stake in NEO and keep a royalty on production. Great partner for NEO to have. |
Posted at 13/11/2024 09:24 by rw16 And today neo say the first £25m has been agreedhxxps://x.com/neoene |
Posted at 20/8/2024 12:23 by pwhite73 runster - Very few if any listed AIM/small cap have any connection with their mining operations overseas. In 95% of cases they are simply fronts for lining directors, nomads, brokers, auditors pockets.NEO was incorporated less than a year ago in November 2023. Major players and individuals lend their names to the company as is common on new listings. Rothschilds, Quinton van der Burgh, AOU Commercial, Sunshine Mineral Reserve Limited etc. All of them receive a slice of the money raised from placings at the expense of PIs and it is at the expense of PIs because PIs own 73% of NEO. The uranium mining operations in South Africa for Beisa and Henkries will cost close to £1 billion. NEO can never raise that money from its listing all it can do is placings here and there to tell you this milestone has been reached and that milestone has been reached. When it comes to mining operations on the scale NEO are talking about in South Africa its not even the major players that appear on their prospectus or in their RNS statements that forward the cash it is the banks that put up the money. NEO is well down from its listing price and continues to fall because the wider and more knowledgeable market knows what's going on. NEO has obtained a listing specifically to raise as much money as it can from the capital markets otherwise why list. Why give 73% of the company away to mug PIs. There is good reason to believe NEO avoided the AIM because of the scrutiny they would be placed under by a nomad. There is no nomad for main listed companies. As sure as night follows day NEO will raise and raise and raise whilst all the time showing how closer they are getting to extracting millions of tons of uranium. Not one single ounce of uranium if ever extracted will belong to NEO |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions