Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[nowenterprise] 14/12/2017 15:55

jf, shorts are lower than they have been since April 2013, how is that depressing?

[notimpressed] 14/12/2017 14:17

jf re post 15655, ME is delirious with christmas cheer

[jfacwc] 14/12/2017 13:54

cheers nowent.! added that to my own lists!good info (if depressing...) should be on the nano bb main page?Mr Oz.?

[jfacwc] 14/12/2017 13:16

annoyingly, the number of nano shares post the recent dilution, has meant the shorters are below the radar, witness the recent 'dissapearance' of GSA from the list.Odd there are not more 'shorter' motivated type posts here, yet still the share price heads south!nano on it's own personal suicide mission.Sad to say, nano is certainly not synonymous with the words 'Christmas Cheer'.

[notimpressed] 14/12/2017 11:52

peel hunt missed out the decimal point when they re-rated nano,
it should have been 6.7p not 67

[tbreak] 12/12/2017 19:21

Second auction again because the out of normal hours fiddling makes closing price have no relation to the days trading. lse has comment on odd trading aimed at fixing toward 27p.

[ih_169538] 12/12/2017 17:14

Interesting reading ...if you understand gibberish.

[nowenterprise] 12/12/2017 14:24

I think that OEM CFQD gaming monitors will hit sales first in early 2018, maybe Spring, likely ahead of TVs.

[andycapped] 12/12/2017 14:18

No kidding really?

Not clinging onto anything, just watching and waiting. I reckon we're about a year to eighteen months behind the schedule I initially thought display would begin to ramp.

I don't expect miracles at CES2018, but I do expect to see products with our dots in them, namely the monitors mentioned in the last briefing. Going through into spring I would expect to see TV's at pre production stage, or possibly release, and by autumn into winter there should be a whole slew of display products with Nanoco/Dow CFQD dots inside.

That's where I believe we're at, my money is where my mouth is. At present still well underwater, as I have been for some months now, but no plans to divest my stock.

[tbreak] 12/12/2017 13:16

Andy, trading shares never makes money it only redistributes it to those that buy low, sell high. When the buy in price is more realistic I'll join you guys who've watched the downward slide still clinging on to hope from small press snippets.

[nowenterprise] 12/12/2017 11:45

Kangde Xin aka KDX - one of Dow's collaborators promoting CFQD film tech in Asia.

hxxp://www.kangdexin.com/company/group

[andycapped] 12/12/2017 09:09

If you're genuinely interested in investing in Nanoco, then I'm a monkey's uncle.

[tbreak] 12/12/2017 08:00

Is it a business or just NP on a 16 year ego trip with mates? In the UK you have to keep up with the Vice Chancellors for bragging rights. To reward anyone else would knock that ego. CES will show they have a few weak collaborations while OLED Nanosys Samsung and sister Hansol get on with making money from real sales.

[andycapped] 12/12/2017 07:38

This was posted by Eskers on lse. Interesting reading.

[bagpuss67] 12/12/2017 04:30

How does one justify options to her and not more of the scientists or have I read that wrong. Still need to check up on whether letting non execs on remco(Brendan cummins) have free money by letting them participate in a deeply discounted placing that PIs can’t complies with corporate governance codes of practice

[supernumerary] 11/12/2017 19:32

Because she needs to have her interests aligned with yours of course. Otherwise she might just put herself first, like Edelman. Duh.

Oh, hang on, something wrong there...

[howl01] 11/12/2017 18:48

Because it's an essential part of the whole charade it seems for this 'business'

[mwwh] 11/12/2017 18:31

Bagpuss67: Because he is managing to keep Nitwit happy.

[bagpuss67] 11/12/2017 02:32

Why the f-// is the investor relations manager getting share options.

[mwwh] 09/12/2017 13:29

No way! Buy tulips.

[tbreak] 08/12/2017 17:40

lol Both look better graphed with a logarithmic value axis. Both have values that are pure speculation, but does the way nanaco value gets pushed up at 16.29 every day not provide the reassurance of its more careful control?