PPE - I can’t recall who used to say it often in a sitcom a few years ago - anyone remember ? |
PPE - Bummer... |
No credible CEO given there are few around with relevant industry background and commercial experience would want to touch Nanoco in its current state with a 10 foot barge pole! |
They need an entrepreneur who has ideas how to utilize unique qualities of Nano CFQD' without relying on external contracts...There own products... |
How will this sinking ship ever attract a competent, top drawer new CEO?Not likely to happen? |
Millwallfan
"Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear oh dear. Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear."
Wouldn't that be a 'herd' of dears..🫣 |
Timing is everything in terms of getting social media right ..so if anyone feels like donating..https://x.com/nanocotech/status/1829544768696692909?s=61&t=s79RLRddG_Gfl7VpUZvZpQ |
Bones698
"What a total lying scumbag you are".
Typical keyboard warrior all mouth no action!
Grow up ffs! |
Bones698
I find it hilarious watching you limp off AGL when it was so obvious Newland had been lying through his teeth! |
Sikthetech
Of course Nanocos IP had value Samsung stole it and made billions selling tens of millions of qdtvs to which Nanco was entitied to a royalty..
But IP has no real value when you cave in and effectively give it all away because prefered shareholders with inside information want to exit on a quick buck and don't give a fig about settling with an ongoing licencing agreement.
That's the reality one party did indeed make billions out of Nanocos IP or are you insinuating that Nanocos tech held no real value to Samsung!
You can't have it both ways! |
PPE,
In answer to your question re settle before IP court, in your post of 6th Jan 2023, NANO!!! lol You were claiming Nano's patents were worth billions... so why would you then sell at 70p!!!!
Caught out again....you and your blnx scaffolder mates are BS liars..
Paul Planet Earth6 Jan '23 - 13:00 - 28495 of 40232 Can anyone point to a court case, if any, where Samsung historically settled before an IP court case commenced?
I can't think of one single occurrence in history..This has to be the first occasion reflecting the sheer overwhelming strength and weight of Nanoco's legal case for willfull infringement and the validity of their patent portfolio now worth billions! |
𝐎𝐧 𝐜𝐨119854;𝐫9852;𝐞 𝐟𝐨119851; 𝟖.𝟕𝟓, 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞119851; 𝐦𝐲 𝐮𝐧119836;𝐚9847;𝐧Ү42;𝐥𝐲; 𝐚𝐜119836;𝐮9851;𝐚Ү53;𝐞 𝟎𝟒 𝐉𝐮119845;𝐲 𝐩𝐨119852;𝐭 𝟑𝟗120790;𝟗0791;. 𝐂𝐨119847;𝐬9842;𝐝Ү38;𝐫𝐢;𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨119837;𝐚9858;’𝐬; 𝐬𝐡119834;𝐫9849; 𝐝𝐫119848;𝐩, 𝐭𝐡119838;𝐫9838;’𝐬; 𝐧𝐨 𝐫𝐞119834;𝐬9848;𝐧 𝐰𝐡119858; 𝐭𝐡119838; 𝐬𝐩 𝐰𝐢119845;𝐥 𝐧𝐨119853; 𝐧𝐨119856; 𝐫𝐞119855;𝐢9852;𝐢Ү53; 𝟕.𝟐𝟎 𝐇𝐚119855;𝐞 𝐚 𝐠𝐫119838;𝐚9853; 𝐰𝐞119838;𝐤9838;𝐧Ү37; |
Sikthetech
It's a well known fact that posts don't have much impact on the share price look it up!
People buy and sell on news.. |
They had about £600k left for buybacks. I'd be surprised if they didn't get at least 1m shares today. Personally I think retaining money is more important right now. |
PPE,
"before you and brain dead Bones698 continue talking b@llocks I got in at around 5p in 2019 sold down a large chunk at close to 70p on 9th Jan 2023 and then exited under the 24p share buyback!"
Of course you got out at a profit, that's what rampers who post BS do, isn't it? whilst persuading the gullible to buy, they sell...
Just like your mate Barky claimed he got out of GBO after they went bust... Like I say, pump/dump.
Honest guv. ;-)
BARKBOO - 23 Jan 2014 - 13:52:05 - 35269 of 40764 Sikky - "Anyone here got a view on MONI?" I meant to post this yesterday.
My scaffolders are very enthusiastic by both MONI and GBO, add to the fact that faces are shorting - makes those two a banker long, And you know I am never wrong.
Yes I have a few quid in both of those.
BARKBOO 9 Jul'15 - 11:20 - 97874 of 97886 0 0
Sikky - I do not have my posts to hand...I only file rags. I can promise readers that I was advised out of those stocks at a then profit and posted the same. |
Barkboo,
I do not see what benefit Pickett brings to the Co?
Nobody appears to have any interest in the tech and this is simpmy a case of wasting resource on a failed strategy. |
Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear oh dear. Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear. |
Sikthetech,
"Samsung legal case (which went as predicted)"
You are just plain bizarre no-one could have predicted the dodgey business going on with prefered shareholders.
And before you and brain dead Bones698 continue talking b@llocks I got in at around 5p in 2019 sold down a large chunk at close to 70p on 9th Jan 2023 and then exited under the 24p share buyback! |
Katsy,
They were desperately pumped by Barky/PPE and the scaffolder gang with their multiple ids.
Anyone can look at the history..
It was pointless continuing the pump after the Samsung legal case (which went as predicted), the gang had to change tactic to persuade the gullible to stay invested, whilst they sold.
Or are you gullible enough to believe the scaffolder gang don't have multiple ids????
Do you think it's a coincidence that Nexn thread was quiet today, having been busy for days.... whilst Nano thread was busy? |
I do hope Colin hasn't wet and sh@t the bed simultaneously this morning on the back of today's appalling but expected Trading Update!..lol |
𝐊𝐚119853;𝐬9858; 𝟑𝟎 𝐀𝐮119840; '𝟐𝟒 𝐩𝐨119852;𝐭 𝟒𝟎120784;𝟏0790; the only ones ramping this since Jan last year has been colin and terrorwit. 𝐏𝐥119838;𝐚9852;𝐞 𝐭𝐫119858; 𝐚𝐧119837; 𝐤𝐞119838;𝐩 𝐮𝐩
𝐂𝐨119816;𝐢9847; 𝐒𝐭119838;𝐢9847; .. 𝟒 𝐉𝐮119845; '𝟐𝟒 - 𝟎𝟗:𝟑𝟎 𝐩𝐨119852;𝐭 𝟑𝟗120790;𝟗0791; 𝐂𝐨119816;𝐢9847; 𝐒𝐭119838;𝐢9847; .. 𝟐𝟓 𝐉𝐮119845; '𝟐𝟒 - 𝟏𝟒:𝟎𝟕 𝐩𝐨119852;𝐭 𝟒𝟎120782;𝟑0788; |