We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macau Property Opportunities Fund Limited | LSE:MPO | London | Ordinary Share | GG00BGDYFV61 | ORD USD0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 31.80 | 31.20 | 32.40 | 32.00 | 32.00 | 32.00 | 52,032 | 16:35:04 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/10/2014 16:06 | Nice little tick up this pm.If you look at the graph since mid month this has moved from 220 to 250p. So only another 40p to go to reach the IC target of 290p. | 888icb | |
24/9/2014 14:55 | Yes looking better today as there has been time for investors to digest the excellent results. ST in the IC has a 290p target in his detailed online article yesterday which may well find its way into the magazine on Friday. | 888icb | |
24/9/2014 11:14 | Looking a bit better | badtime | |
23/9/2014 21:51 | Yeah well if it's 15p (which looks about right) then you could take NAV as 301p - or ~313p at current exchange rates. | sammu | |
23/9/2014 12:40 | Yep and it's all in the accounts | badtime | |
23/9/2014 11:39 | ST from IC article online 30 minutes ago: "Moreover, the underlying growth was in effect even greater because Macau has reported its accounts inline with a new and very recent interpretation of international accounting standard IAS 12 with regards to a deferred tax liability. This meant that net assets of $398m (£244m) were understated by $19.6m (£12m) in the company’s accounts, equivalent to 15p a share, even though all of Macau’s asset disposals to date have been transacted through special purpose vehicles, and so avoid taxes. The company’s directors intend to continue operating in this way which means that they have adopted a very conservative stance by accounting for this 15p a share deferred tax liability." | jakecook | |
23/9/2014 11:37 | “We need to know whether this tax will be paid Until then this is going nowhere due to the uncertainty” The difference in the two NAVs (IFRS 160p vs. 286p adjusted NAV) is down to the treatment of work-in-progress, not the deferred tax situation. Property company accounting is notoriously conservative when it comes to valuing work-in-progress; it basically uses cost rather than market value. This is stated out in note 17 to the accounts as follows: “Under IFRS, inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The Adjusted NAV includes the uplift of inventories to their market values.” In any event the 286p NAV assumes that the newly interpreted deferred tax charge will arise. This is clearly stated on the first page of the results as follows: "Adjusted NAV per share gained 30.7% to US$4.89 (286p*), taking into account a deferred tax charge which reflects a new and very recent interpretation of an international accounting standard. IFRS NAV per share rose 14.6% to US$2.74 (160p*) year-on-year." Deferred taxes are commonly produced by unrealised capital gains which may become chargeable at some future date (because the asset is sold). In the case of property companies it is normal for the building to be owned by a separate company and when the building is sold the transaction involves the sale of this company rather than the building (which doesn’t crystallise these deferred taxes though the sale of the company sometimes creates a corporation tax charge). | salvorhardin | |
23/9/2014 11:32 | i think you are reading that wrong. if they don't pay tax the NAV is $19m higher. the £1.60 is using different accounting methods (IFRS). still, rhetoric is a bit mixed / flat. | oregano | |
23/9/2014 11:17 | A NAV of £2.86 is good but a NAV of £1.60 is bad. We need to know whether this tax will be paid Until then this is going nowhere due to the uncertainty. | tyranosaurus | |
22/9/2014 10:57 | Re tax ...they also mentioned that they don't think it will need to be paid...see results for further info | badtime | |
22/9/2014 09:57 | Results out | badtime | |
22/9/2014 09:22 | They are not able to buy back in the closed period - they appointed a firm to buy back independently so the delay (possibly for the reason stated below) may have been very marginally helpful. Results are out - go to their website. www.mpofund.com/inve It seems to me that the results may have been delayed by a "very recent interpretation of an international accounting standard" regarding tax assumptions which reduced adjuded NAV by ~ $19m. The exchange rate was taken at $1.70 and has since moved usefully in our favour. Some discussion about changes to regulations and market growth moderation. | sammu | |
22/9/2014 08:49 | I'm no expert (understatement) but I expect that to take advantage of delayed results by doing cheap buy-backs may not be totally kosher. | phat hair | |
22/9/2014 08:38 | and this slide continues | badtime | |
19/9/2014 17:05 | If they want to buy back shares at a better price - how better than to break the "goldern rule". | sammu | |
19/9/2014 16:41 | Ring and ask them maybe? | badtime | |
19/9/2014 16:13 | Intriguing head fake from Lazard, and disappointing that the company has failed to adhere to its own timescale for publishing annual results; why would that be? | mark2market | |
19/9/2014 15:07 | Lazards back down to 19%......looks as if the buyback was from them | badtime | |
19/9/2014 08:27 | Gd to see they bought a fair whack of there shares yesterday at 236...wonder who was selling? | badtime | |
18/9/2014 19:30 | I think they are still playing with their abacus- working out how much to return to shareholders My guess is 30 p which would still leave 300 p of assets | jbarcroftr | |
18/9/2014 16:19 | Well let's hope the delay is for gd reasons....I topped up (240) but didn't catch the bottom | badtime | |
18/9/2014 15:31 | If there's one golden rule If you want to support your share price Don't delay your results | spob | |
18/9/2014 15:30 | Because results have been delayed | spob | |
18/9/2014 14:40 | Very odd share price behaviour Why would anyone sell now when share purchases are almost certain to resume after the results and there may also be a distribution of the surplus cash I just don't unsterstand | jbarcroftr |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions