Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[geckotheglorious] 02/7/2021 11:08

Fats
"I'm currently looking for a religious cult or a chapter of hells angels that want a crib rent free for as long as it takes, dog owners accepted of course"

If I was younger I'd offer my servicess.

:)

[arja] 02/7/2021 10:58

stupid David Davies talking about flu killing people in the question time discussion about covid19 . As far as I know there is not LONG flu !

[fatnacker] 02/7/2021 10:48

done that scruff, they installed recording equipment and that's about as far as it went despite some extremely loud recording from inside my property they went on to say because I didn't live there it wasn't causing me a nuisance, the fact is there's a conflict in that if the authority confiscates the animals they become responsible for them, now if they were fined a £1000 a time that would make a difference but the only party likely to receive a fine would be the person taking the matter into his own hands, that would have been me, I'm currently looking for a religious cult or a chapter of hells angels that want a crib rent free for as long as it takes, dog owners accepted of course.

"scruff12 Jul '21 - 09:32 - 343470 of 343475
0 1 0
fats
Local authorities are not powerless if the animals are causing a major nuisance. Get a form and log the incidents. They have a duty to act - the tenants and the local authority"

[arja] 02/7/2021 10:39

maybe you LLOY holders should think about switching to BGEO which has a lovely chart and momentum ?. No idea about it,s fundamentals as I trade using charts only .

[maxk] 02/7/2021 09:55

This thread has gone to the dogs..

[scruff1] 02/7/2021 09:52

sentiment
It didnt seem to bother Miss Colandangelo

[jordaggy] 02/7/2021 09:52

Drip drip till the 29th I guess...

Edit: Drift drift...

[sentimental rules] 02/7/2021 09:42

yes its a lovely bond they have dont get me wrong. Just dont get the attraction of letting a dog slobber all over you

[scruff1] 02/7/2021 09:34

sentiment
Lots worse things that people get up to. I dont think the dog will find your mate particularly gross - its the salt they like

[geckotheglorious] 02/7/2021 09:34

"Sentimental rules
Post 343469
"got a mate who after cricket matches lets his dog lick his sweat off his face. pretty gross"

Agreed. But imagine how strong his immune system will be!!! :)

[scruff1] 02/7/2021 09:32

fats
Local authorities are not powerless if the animals are causing a major nuisance. Get a form and log the incidents. They have a duty to act - the tenants and the local authority

[sentimental rules] 02/7/2021 09:30

got a mate who after cricket matches lets his dog lick his sweat off his face. pretty gross

[fatnacker] 02/7/2021 09:27

Quite right, I own a house where the "new neighbours" moved in with a pack of greyhound type dogs 30 or so hens and an uncountable number of cats, fairly respectable people but clearly animal loving nutt jobs, no one wants to rent a house where the neighbours dogs go ballistic at the slightest sound, local authorities are powerless, I've had to step away from the situation to save myself a spell at her majesty's pleasure."If you are both out at work all day imo your circumstances are such that you shouldnt want to or be allowed to own a dog. They are pack creatures and its a form of cruelty to to leave them on their lonesome for so long - get a cat or adopt a tiger at a zoo or summat and go and see when you got time"

[maxk] 02/7/2021 09:13

Spot on Pierre! (343463)

[maxk] 02/7/2021 09:11

€uropean "friends" news...




European holidays could be off limits to 5m Britons given Indian-made AstraZeneca jab

The jab, authorised in the UK in February, is not yet approved in Europe or recognised under EU’s new vaccine passport scheme

By
Sarah Newey,
GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY CORRESPONDENT ;
Paul Nuki,
GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY EDITOR and
Charles Hymas,
HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR
1 July 2021 • 9:00pm


Up to five million Britons face being locked out of European holidays because their vaccines are not recognised by the EU's passport scheme, the Telegraph has learned.

Millions of vaccines administered here do not qualify for the European Union’s vaccine passport scheme, because the shots were manufactured in India and are not yet authorised by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

The hitch could leave thousands of Britons turned away at EU border crossings when the batch numbers on their vaccines are checked digitally.

The EU Digital Covid Certificate, which launched on Thursday, is designed to allow Covid-secure travel across the continent but does not recognise a version of the AstraZeneca vaccine called Covishield, produced by the Serum Institute of India (SII), because it is yet to receive approval in Europe.

Up to five million doses of this version of the vaccine have been administered in the UK and are identifiable by the vaccine batch numbers (4120Z001, 4120Z002, 4120Z003) included on recipients’ vaccine cards and in the Covid travel pass available via the NHS app.

The EU ruling has already sparked outrage in Asia and Africa, where the Indian manufactured shot – which forms the backbone of the Covax distribution scheme – has been widely used. Now, some British holidaymakers may find themselves similarly excluded.

The Telegraph has traced three Britons affected, none of whom were told in advance they were to receive the Indian version of the AstraZeneca vaccine. All received their shots of the SII vaccine in March.

“Quite frankly [I feel] discriminated against, for lack of a better word,” said 21-year-old Hannah Smith, who found that her first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine was produced in India when she checked the batch numbers. She added that, until the situation was clarified, she would jettison plans for a European holiday and “settle for Scotland”.

Another individual, whose first shot was also produced in India but who asked not to be identified, added: “That vaccine passports would be a thing is entirely predictable, so our Government should have made sure any they purchased would be recognised for travel everywhere.”




More tripe here:

[pierre oreilly] 02/7/2021 09:09

I'd add to that scruff. I wouldn't allow dogs where there are babies in the family. Everyone thinks their own dog wouldn't attack a baby, but lots do. A rat or rabbit or baby are all pretty much the same to most dogs. We waited till our youngest was five.

[scruff1] 02/7/2021 09:06

If you are both out at work all day imo your circumstances are such that you shouldnt want to or be allowed to own a dog. They are pack creatures and its a form of cruelty to to leave them on their lonesome for so long - get a cat or adopt a tiger at a zoo or summat and go and see when you got time

[geckotheglorious] 02/7/2021 08:59

Spot on Scruff.
Post 343459

And similarly have sympathy with fatknacks complaints about leaving dogs at home alone.

[scruff1] 02/7/2021 08:58

I accept allowing her to have pups was my fault for being a bad owner. I was only a young chap at the time. It never happened again

[geckotheglorious] 02/7/2021 08:50

Fatknacks.

"puppy farmers should be locked in a cell with a pack of excitable over fed hounds with spastic colons"

You mean under fed surely!!! :)
They'll be starving.

[sentimental rules] 02/7/2021 08:29

bloody Nissan - how dare they invest over £1 bln in the UK creating many thousands of jobs - how dare they ! that bloody Brexit !!


ROFLMAO