Kibo Energy Share Discussion Threads

[yaki] 15/2/2022 11:38

4m net buys so far today!

[yaki] 15/2/2022 11:37

Last buys at 0.2p, incl a 1.5m whopper.
Despite a sell of 1m.

Amazing I added a few mlns only few days ago at 0.151p

[frankandbeans] 15/2/2022 10:36

Yaki
How can you expect people to believe that you are genuinely pleased with the buy price nearing 0.2p off the back of a few thousand quids worth of trades, when this was trading at many multiples of that in the not too distant past, or if you are then that explains a lot.

Let’s just ignore those CLN is it?

[yaki] 15/2/2022 10:31

In the meantime, some good buying so far today!
3m+ net buys and buy price getting closer to 0.2p with every trade!

[frankandbeans] 15/2/2022 10:13

Yaki

You never know they might waiver their owed salaries and not exercise the CLN.

They might actually complete on a single project one day also.

What’s first, another MOU or a conversion notice and share consolidation?

Research.

[yaki] 15/2/2022 10:07

cj

agreed, it is the issue. A couple of ideas here:

equity can sought from other sources and Kibo keeps only any development premium - so instead of 65%, say 35%
MAST owes Kibo 1.5m - so if they raise funds on MAst side, can replay the loan to Kibo

and a few others

But let's see what the company does!

cj41 15 Feb '22 - 08:55 - 8245 of 8249

The elephant in the room is funding. It’s pretty difficult to see how a company which can’t afford to pay its salaries is going to fund multi million pound projects. Plus the history of never actually completing any projects.

[cj41] 15/2/2022 09:27

As long as there are projects to aim for there is a reason for more placings to keep paying the directors. That appears to be the solestrategy IMO. It's served some very well over the past 10 years.

[guitars4stars] 15/2/2022 09:26

When Frankie tries present himself as balanced...Lol

[frankandbeans] 15/2/2022 09:16

Careful CJ you are in danger of being accused of being a zero holding agenda posting multi ID poster with such open views as that. Who do you think you will get labelled as being on LSE? There’s limited choice now as I’m apparently several accounts on LSE. I’m not obviously but hey hoo, they won’t get therapy.

[cj41] 15/2/2022 08:55

The elephant in the room is funding. It's pretty difficult to see how a company which can't afford to pay its salaries is going to fund multi million pound projects. Plus the history of never actually completing any projects.

[frankandbeans] 15/2/2022 08:48

First comes the pump…

[guitars4stars] 14/2/2022 21:32

Crack on needy last poster:I do however find fascinating your perpetual neediness to have the last word, my interest here is I have a shed load of cash invested versus you with zero yet you alone try present yourself as a white knight here to save myself & others from persuasion whilst spending your whole non holding day trying to pursuade.What a crazy cat :)

[frankandbeans] 14/2/2022 21:24

GforS
As I said, I don’t really care what you think, or how much you have or have not invested, it’s irrelevant to my view.
An opinion that won’t be swayed with personal taunts.

[lurker5] 14/2/2022 20:18

For a mere ten year project its not appropriate to use a PER Yaki. - especially a PER of 10. A proportion of NPV would be more scientific. (Where you should know that paying the full NPV up front merely gets back your investment plus the discount rate over ten years. Not very sensible for a risky project) The 10 yr 8% NPV for £670,000 pa is £4.5m and 50% of that is worth about £2.3m now. Doesn't look very good against the 1/3rd of £5.85m capex share needed now does it.

[cj41] 14/2/2022 19:21

Hats off to Sharegar on the other side though.

[cj41] 14/2/2022 19:15

I don't enjoy F&Bs posts but I find the constant replying with the same non-content/play the man stuff just monotonous and disappointing. It's a bit of a cop out to take the stance that any challenge regarding KIBO's past and future performance can be answered with the same old rhetoric. It would be good to hear some reasoning behind any positivity (Yaki's post earlier for example) not because I want to take advantage of the unquestionably great minds of the Twitter group but to know why some think KIBO has a positive future. I would like that to be so but find it difficult to make the case but maybe I am missing something.

[guitars4stars] 14/2/2022 18:40

Crack on needy last poster:I do however find fascinating your perpetual neediness to have the last word, my interest here is I have a shed load of cash invested versus you with zero yet you alone try present yourself as a white knight here to save myself & others from persuasion whilst spending your whole non holding day trying to pursuade.What a crazy cat :)

[frankandbeans] 14/2/2022 18:12

GforS
I don’t care how much cash you have “invested̶1; here or what you think of my opinion, I will continue to post here as I see fit and there’s absolutely nothing that you can do to stop people posting their views and opinion, just because you don’t agree with it.

You seem to think only shareholders are entitled to have an opinion, what rubbish.

[frankandbeans] 14/2/2022 17:30

GforS

It’s quite easy to discern blue from red though isn’t it so that’s not a surprise really is it.

This time last week you were claiming I was Jax05, now you are claiming I’m another account on LSE, who are you going to claim I am next week I wonder? Drax?

But of course it suits you to try and make out that anyone with an opposing view to your is actually one and the same person as others with the same opposing view doesn’t it.

I mean you don’t think that perhaps, just perhaps there’s a few people that don’t share your rose tinted view?

Something to think on.

Research.

[guitars4stars] 14/2/2022 16:51

What a surprise.....I'm sure the usual non holders will have good reason to explain to us that blue is actually red & how we don't quite understand the visual complexity of colour.:)What a daft pudding you are Frankie

[frankandbeans] 14/2/2022 16:46

GforS except I didn’t did I, though I agree entirely with the content.

You really think that there’s one poster operating multiple accounts across several different mediums don’t you? You have gotten yourself all in a paranoid muddle, and can’t help but jump at shadows. And even were that the case, which is clearly is not, you still choose to engage in banal name calling, instead of discussing the merits of the co.

Get some help.

[guitars4stars] 14/2/2022 16:20

Frankie steady you projected this ....Only 17m volume - I can see this closing in the red today, the MM spiked some punters at open with a mark up and will be getting that stock back off them at discount by close IMO.:)

[frankandbeans] 14/2/2022 16:17

Yaki

So you now value this project at 13m “value”?

So they are actual masterminds of innovation! Why they should be able to obtain the funding needed at a snip with those returns! Why hasn’t anyone else entered into an agreement like this before now, why they must be uniquely placed to come up with an arrangement such as this, that other, larger, and more well funded concerns have seemingly overlooked!

GENIUS!!

Or shall we just add this to the pile of other “projects̶1; that you lauded huge returns for little outlay, which have all come to nothing to date?

Previous performance and all that.

[guitars4stars] 14/2/2022 16:14

You always deflect dissuade without legitimate interest here.Look in the mirror man....