Kibo Energy Share Discussion Threads

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 22:57

United - that’s your opinion, not mine.

Did I say boiler room? Perhaps echo chamber is more appropriate.

Strong buy.

Hilarious.

[uknighted] 10/2/2022 20:07

F&b since you ask it sounds NOTHING like a boiler room nor should it.

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 19:53

GforS

The fact that you all today felt the need to chime in here to defend your posting history speaks volumes.

Guilty conscience I guess?

Imagine that. Tick tock.

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 17:32

And here’s another one, I must have hit a nerve today.

United - as I said, posters claiming that they have access to information, and posters claiming that they have access to “research̶1; that is limited to membership of a private group, sounds remarkably like a boiler room does it not? And said posters suggesting that they are aware of coming newsflow, and are “topping up” ahead of that on that basis, isn’t too dissimilar to the phrases used by pump and dump crews.

You can try and persuade yourself until the cows come home that that hasn’t been the inference in several posts.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

[uknighted] 10/2/2022 16:39

F&b I am not in any “private group” but even I can see that such a group could undertake research and share such research amongst themselves without that research being inside information. Get into the real world.

[yaki] 10/2/2022 16:27

there is private information and insider information. Former is fine and the whole point of doing research, latter - not at all and is criminal offence!


Frankandbeans 10 Feb '22 - 16:22 - 8165 of 8165
0 0 0
Yaki
That may well be the case but as you well know that doesn’t stop people from suggesting they have information that isn’t in the public domain, perhaps in a “well researched private Twitter group” for example.

I’m sure I can dig up a few posts to jog your memory if required, there’s enough of them.

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 16:22

Yaki
That may well be the case but as you well know that doesn’t stop people from suggesting they have information that isn’t in the public domain, perhaps in a “well researched private Twitter group” for example.

I’m sure I can dig up a few posts to jog your memory if required, there’s enough of them.

[yaki] 10/2/2022 16:11

because trading while having insider info is illegal and criminal offence ?!?


"... have inside info, or that they are the one buying all these golden tickets because they are good mates with someone in the know on the ground."


Frankandbeans 10 Feb '22 - 15:47 - 8160 of 8162
0 0 0
I have outlined my reasons for posting the truth here several times, why do you peridot in trying to besmirch myself and any other posters that dare suggest that all is not well here.

More liquidity created for sellers as predicted, surprised nobody has started crowing that they have inside info, or that they are the one buying all these golden tickets because they are good mates with someone in the know on the ground.

At least most seem to have the common sense to give this, and those spouting such ridiculous pumps, a very wide berth.

Nowt but an oubliette.

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 15:47

I have outlined my reasons for posting the truth here several times, why do you peridot in trying to besmirch myself and any other posters that dare suggest that all is not well here.

More liquidity created for sellers as predicted, surprised nobody has started crowing that they have inside info, or that they are the one buying all these golden tickets because they are good mates with someone in the know on the ground.

At least most seem to have the common sense to give this, and those spouting such ridiculous pumps, a very wide berth.

Nowt but an oubliette.

[yaki] 10/2/2022 11:18

Ha ha, moral duty

Reminds Yes, Minister. The episode with selling arms

Moral issues - problem of CoE. Lol


Frankandbeans 10 Feb '22 - 10:48 - 8154 of 8156

0  1 0

Yaki

I wondered how long it would take before you threw your hat in.

“ who would else comment on a share if they don't have financial interest like s/hs.”

Well for one, someone that doesn’t want others being burned by pump and dump crews that have been operating here, or those that are posting misleading information in order to try and attract buyers for their own nefarious ends.

Quite simple really, and the fact that there are posters here that are adverse to the truth being told, tells volumes in itself.

Consider it my moral duty.

[frankandbeans] 10/2/2022 10:52

GforS

As I have already explained why would anyone in their right mind buy in ahead of a mass dilution event, which appears as though it will culminate in a share consolidation.

It’s not that difficult a concept to grasp is it?

Research.