Kibo Energy Share Discussion Threads

[lurker5] 31/10/2022 14:14

I've had an eye op Twangers. Typos are a by-product. Its no good expecting you to think before posting of course.

[yaki] 31/10/2022 13:20

lurker5
you mean someone like NCCL Board like experience, lol

The LTH shareholders I have come across range from folks who have run companies in SADC area for good 20+ years, running complex construction projects in UK, investment and insurance specialist who run/advised on multi bln projects in UK and globally, insolvency and restructuring experts, tech leaders at big brokerage houses etc etc

Trust me, if I were the company, would have loved to have such a knowledgeable shareholder base. Maybe set up an advisory board around them?



lurker5 31 Oct '22 - 10:56 - 7496 of 7500

DPR. No one who posts here or on the other board shows any evidence of management experience - or even much understanding of the ecoomic realities of Kibo's various projects. And certainly no experience or credentials as activist investors. They will have no credibility whasoever in any legal actio to force change in Kio's management. You need to find someone who has - and such individuals are unlikey ever to have invested in anything connected with LC.

[lurker5] 31/10/2022 12:36

DPR You can tell by the remarks, comments, judgements, they make about various aspects of the case. You would be able to recognise how experienced they are if you had such experience youself. 'Board' experience doesn't indicate what management experience or quualifications anyone might have - depending on what sort of company we're talking about.

[frankandbeans] 31/10/2022 11:29

DPR you seem to be losing your rag somewhat.

Tsk tsk.

No need for petty name calling, it’s down to the individual what personal information they choose to share on these anonymous boards, so if one chose to share their CV then I suppose that would be ok?!

[dpr1881] 31/10/2022 11:12

@ Lurker5 how would you know which posters have management experience?? Personally I have board experience on a number of regulated entities and a public company, not that it is any of your business! @ F&B should TR1s be required to share their CV while you operate as an anonymous troll?

[lurker5] 31/10/2022 10:56

DPR. No one who posts here or on the other board shows any evidence of management experience - or even much understanding of the ecoomic realities of Kibo's various projects. And certainly no experience or credentials as activist investors. They will have no credibility whasoever in any legal actio to force change in Kio's management. You need to find someone who has - and such individuals are unlikey ever to have invested in anything connected with LC.

[frankandbeans] 31/10/2022 10:53

Physic powers?

You aren’t going to get very far if you can’t even get your words down correctly.

And SIB as ever being proven repeatedly to be correct is an ongoing incentive to post here, as for outcome, well I suspect that this will not end well for shareholders.

But what do I know, im not psychic.

[sirianbotham] 31/10/2022 10:40

F&B what's you ideal outcome here?

[sirianbotham] 31/10/2022 10:39

We all know LC is not good with numbers ... Majority voted for 1-3 so surprised to only see 158m forWould love to have seen the numbers against 4-8Can count them when it suits and choose to ignore when it doesn't.

[yaki] 31/10/2022 10:22

"...I often wonder if he is connected to those involved in other underhanded tactics around Kibo or is he alone troll?"

Been wandering the same. It is just not normal to keep posting on a share, negatively for years in his various disguises - either paid deramper or sad soul with no friends.

There are very good reasons why I don't post on the other 12,000 shares listed on LSE. I am not neither of the above. Lol


DPR1881 31 Oct '22 - 10:15 - 7490 of 7491

@SIB yes that's a valid alternative but I am not there yet. F&B would appear to have an agenda as well as some incredible physic powers I often wonder if he is connected to those involved in other underhanded tactics around Kibo or is he alone troll?

[dpr1881] 31/10/2022 10:15

@SIB yes that's a valid alternative but I am not there yet. F&B would appear to have an agenda as well as some incredible physic powers I often wonder if he is connected to those involved in other underhanded tactics around Kibo or is he alone troll?

[sirianbotham] 31/10/2022 10:08

Of course the alternative is to sell, cut losses and move on ....Perhaps that's what some people want.

[dpr1881] 31/10/2022 10:03

@F&B of course you can laugh and snipe but the fact remains that shareholder activism has already achieved some limited success for example LC can no longer dilute shareholders on a whim as he has lost his authority to allot shares forcing a realisation of assets or other funding. Of course there is always the remote possibility the company will deliver on their plans in which case you and I will become irrelevant. Some major shareholders prefer to keep doing the same things and backing dead horses hoping for a different outcome whereas others take action.

[dpr1881] 31/10/2022 09:44

@F&B No the blog will be independent and free of any agenda. The aim will be simple to educate shareholders on their Companies Act rights, how to exercise them and what can be achieved through collective activism. If the company has total disregard for the interests of its minority shareholders then the choice is simple : sit on the sidelines moaning and crying or get involved to bring about change! SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGER TOGETHER

[frankandbeans] 31/10/2022 09:34

A blog?

Is that just for the members of the share holders activist group (SHAG)?

Educating everyone else? Perhaps you should put together a CBT.

Lol

[dpr1881] 31/10/2022 09:10

@F&B I have tried dialogue with the company but unfortunately that failed due to the underhand tactics and scheming of some of those involved. I have no grandiose plans just a very simple one: to achieve executive management change through shareholder activism. It seems from Kibo's last RNS that they will be working with Sanderson to overcome the difficulties they experienced in voting. I will be setting up a blog to educate everyone else and to encourage shareholder participation.

[frankandbeans] 30/10/2022 18:57

It’s like history repeating.

How many times have savours swooped in with grandiose plans, only to end up joining the other stale bulls claiming it’s a “strong buy”.

End of the day, they saw you coming a mile off, invited you to join their private group? Buttered you up?

Be mindful of the same selling whilst you’re buying, it’s something that’s happened here before on several occasions.

Oubliette.

[lurker5] 30/10/2022 15:05

Look for more spin soon, in the guise of 'research' by the arch purveyors of misinformation 'ACF' reasearch (Thoroughly discredited in its absurd and totally unprofessional targets for EUA (the latter chaired - surpise, surprise - by our friend and unlamented chairman Schaffalitsky)and which appears to be composed of one self-promoting and inexperienced individual - and perhaps a dog - with little other 'research' to its name. Alternatively by that other charlatan 'research house' Align Research - who is lurking in the wings, connected via a dodgy looking incestuous relationship with an outfit behind Msst's two latest acquisitions - one Riverfort Global Opportunities who last year bailed out Align after the latters' 'conviction' research targets that it was unwise (or arrogant) enough to invest in itself, tanked. Align puffed to extreme fantasies Corcel's equivalent to Mast - its 'flexible'power business which has - oops - sunk out of sight.

[dpr1881] 30/10/2022 11:52

@F&B The waste to energy spin out will allow an opportunity for the company to raise cash with vendor shares. They might also consider completing some of their projects or disposing some of their assets, clearly to this point the executive management have proved incapable of doing so. Shareholders have three choices: 1) Sell at a loss 2) Back an executive management team which to this point have delivered almost nothing other than spectacular losses 3) Seek change through collective action. It would seem some of the major shareholders support option 2 but that is for them to determine. Personally I intend to pursue option 3 in a more public forum than I have to this point.

[yaki] 30/10/2022 11:06

Maybe start making profits?
I am sure they have been practicing for the last 10 years how to do so!

Frankandbeans 30 Oct '22 - 10:34 - 7477 of 7477

So how do they keep the company running with no money coming in?