Sounds like the UK will be energy secure using renewables by 2035 unfortunately no one knows not even starmer how it’s going to be achieved 🙄 |
So, ESG?
How trendy! How considerate. |
https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/policy/major-boost-for-hydrogen-in-china-as-new-law-classes-it-as-energy-resource-rather-than-hazardous-chemical/2-1-1737843 |
 "albeit with a grant"
Has always been the crux.
ITM ought to be able to show the value of the solutions they offer, regardless of grants and handouts...and I believe they can (although, it would be easier to believe if we saw the Public Report on time, that we were promised for Refhyne 1).
Trump's climate views, whatever they may be, should not be a factor in the matter.
For a start, ITM Power are a UK company. Secondly, it is either profitable for a customer to buy ITM products or it is not.
If it is, customers will buy that value.
If it is profitable, but only with incentives and grants, then this is a very bad business model, utterly reliant on psychopaths in suits being able to lay heavy burdens on the people. Indefinitely?
Why would anyone want to buy what you are selling?
ESG?
Can you show us when it would be profitable for a customer to purchase ITM solutions without a grant? Now, already? When? Where?
ITM Power are yet, in my opinion, to effectively present this value to the public or to shareholders.
Show us the numbers!
Show us why this customer bought this product - and, would they have done so without the grant?
"We can't speak for the customer."
Indeed.
Why would anyone want to buy what you are selling?
Why should I invest? |
ITM Power PLC (AIM:ITM) has been maintained as a "Buy," reflecting its strong backing by industry giants like Linde and Shell.
The company closed 2023 with cash reserves of £230 million and currently has an order backlog of £127 million.
Its participation in the UK’s Hydrogen Allocation Rounds could drive additional orders for its NEPTUNE V systems as the country targets 1 gigawatt of capacity by 2025.
"ITM is backed by large and reputable players in the industry, with Linde as a key shareholder," the analysis noted. |
Strong finish. Has the sector boimunced off the bottom? |
Jefferies cuts ITM power price target to 60 (80) pence - 'buy' |
Sad but true. But I feel he will be able to afford a travelodge for a few days |
Hiring in Germany
CEO working on Sundays.
Can translate at bottom : 1 sales mgr, 1 project mgr & 7 Engineers : No need for Linde and better profits,for smaller kit. |
ITM has finally arrived as its CEO and CTO show they can enjoy humor in a tough market. The 5 MW Neptune V is clearly the market leader and with ITM's containerised plug and play 1& 2 MWs units, form a smart range suited for today's state of the market. BP and Neom are freezing or pulling out for lack of offtake ;With cash in the bank Schulz and his team must cut the overheads to a minimum soonest then hold a fort hopefully on break even or better to satisfy today's needs ready to zoom back up when the market takes off as it will eventually have to. I believe the management endorse this sentiment but it remains to be seen if they will execute. The corporate change of advisors is also a hint at change, but the politics in Germany is a factor that will also effect outcomes,, In any case, there will be enough demand in the above range to keep ITM in business as the market leader therein |
One thing about Dennis is that he doesn’t make announcements for the sake of it. That Neptune sale is a major milestone for ITM probably more important than the electrolysers sold to both RWE and Shell. |
Until the outfit registers decent sales and stops the back slapping I am short |
Another one increased though |
Ennismore have reduced their short by -0.09%. |
Quite a significant sale yesterday. Especially so soon after the launch shorts keeping the price low for now. |
https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/production/we-will-not-invest-in-any-more-clean-hydrogen-projects-until-we-secure-more-offtake-for-our-existing-ones-air-products/2-1-1737152 |
will 😂😂😂
Don’t think oil companies will leave oil in the ground whilst there is a profit in it. |
Graham, I was going to say I guess you are in Wales then but that would be a huge Kemi-style own goal. LOL.
The trouble with Labour is it is not even about pollution. They must know well that cars are at their most efficient when they are at higher speeds and having 20 is just like having a permanent traffic jam. They are determined to make us all so sick of driving, that we will give up and travel by bus or train, as if public transport is not already overcrowded.
Then there is North Sea oil and gas. What intellectual process leads a person to conclude that we should stop any new oil and gas exploration and just import what we need? Then tax current producers out of business.
The thought process -let's make the companies all so sick of the UK that they leave and decide they will never return, no matter who is in government. End of UK oil and gas production. Job done.
After what the Tories did to them, tax-wise, they do not have any comeback. |
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Hot Features
Premium
