Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Image Scan Holdings LSE:IGE London Ordinary Share GB0031410581 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 2.90p 100,000 08:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
2.80p 3.00p 2.90p 2.90p 2.90p
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Electronic & Electrical Equipment 5.03 0.48 0.45 6.4 4.9

Image Scan (IGE) Latest News

More Image Scan News
Image Scan Takeover Rumours

Image Scan (IGE) Share Charts

1 Year Image Scan Chart

1 Year Image Scan Chart

1 Month Image Scan Chart

1 Month Image Scan Chart

Intraday Image Scan Chart

Intraday Image Scan Chart

Image Scan (IGE) Discussions and Chat

Image Scan Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
24/9/201812:04Image Scan: ADVANCED IMAGING TECHNOLOGY for security and NDT5,819
06/12/201715:13IGE - WORLD leader in REAL-TIME X-RAY technology32
17/6/201409:45Image Scan Holdings CEO Interview on Tip TV-
30/11/201117:03International Gold / Bjorkdal4
23/12/200310:51Image Scan105

Add a New Thread

Image Scan (IGE) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
2018-09-24 12:25:452.8025,000700.50O
2018-09-24 11:11:492.953,18894.05O
2018-09-24 09:43:542.8047613.34O
2018-09-24 07:29:212.8015,000420.30O
View all Image Scan trades in real-time

Image Scan (IGE) Top Chat Posts

Image Scan Daily Update: Image Scan Holdings is listed in the Electronic & Electrical Equipment sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IGE. The last closing price for Image Scan was 2.90p.
Image Scan Holdings has a 4 week average price of 2.70p and a 12 week average price of 2.70p.
The 1 year high share price is 13.25p while the 1 year low share price is currently 2.70p.
There are currently 167,604,577 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 233,687 shares. The market capitalisation of Image Scan Holdings is £5,028,137.31.
mr macgregor: "no logic, just doing harm." I think that's utter tosh. You'll find people out to move a price one way or another on advfn post with a bizarre frequency that suggests they're either of unsound mind or else have sufficient financial interest to make them think it's worth spending the time. Anyway, it seems to me the company doesn't need any help in undermining it's reputation. The series of events referred to by diver999 is that the board issued a series of positive updates, the share price soared, Boundary Capital, a company in which two directors had a declared financial interest, sold out, the board issued a chain of negative updates and the share price slumped. I consider, perhaps wrongly, that my negative opinion on the chronology has logic and I'm not sure why you're so worried about opinions that differ from yours. I'm not worked up about your positive opinion. You're entitled to it.
kazoom: Not sure if you're including me on the 'suspects' list here, but honestly there is no agenda here from me. I'm a former and possibly future shareholder just telling it as I see it. I've been around on ADVFN (off and on) for a lonnnngg time and I think me record speaks for itself, I don't do ramping or deramping. And yes Assagai, I agree your correction to my point. A 22% shareholder can't for sure block a vote that only requires 50%. But if it is going to be a contentious vote anyway that is a heck of a headwind. Actually though I still stand by my view that she PROBABLY wasn't given sufficient facts before the event to give a clear ok to the proposed fund-raising. Looking back to the AGM, the two resolutions to allow the board to allot new shares were voted down, I wonder by whom? These are bog standard resolutions that almost every company passes every year on the nod. So, my take on this is that, for whatever reason, this shareholder does not want to see dilution. IMHO the board failed to address this. To be frank though, as I alluded to before, the idea that the Board made a mistake - that they can learn from - is a more positive view than to think there is a significant antagonistic shareholder with significant influence. Just my thoughts and I don't intend to say too much more on the subject. A share price of 2.9p and a market cap of less that £5m may well be a massive bargain, so I do wish all holders well. I have adapted my strategy over time and now look for clearer evidence that any 'issues' have been resolved, which probably means that I might end up paying twice the price (still below where I sold). But I do know from painful past experience that if another piece of bad news goes against the company, stupidly cheap can become insanely cheap. I sincerely hope that is not the case here - I would not buy at half the price if the story was worsening, but might buy at twice the price on clear improvements. Clearly there are rampers and de-rampers about on these boards, but there can also be honest views which might challenge your own - it's always worth reconsidering your views - I have found that hard too, but hey, it's all about learning. Best to all.
trident5: Wow - share price down 75% and we're all supposed to cheerlead the management as they lurch from one self-imposed crisis to another.
mr macgregor: "Again, come to the meetings and ask questions" Maybe attending meetings and listening to management speak gave you a false sense of security as a slump played out? Judging by the company performance and share price action, those who kept management at arm's length fared better ; )
gnnmartin: I went to the last IGE GM, where the vote was not taken because RS were still opposed. I heard the inside story (not confidential, as far as I know). IGE had discussed the proposed takeover with RS before making the bid, RS had said they were supportive. However, when the bid was announced and the GM called, RS unexpectedly put in a proxy vote against. Several posters here have assumed that IGE did not sound out RS before making the bid. That assumption is incorrect. The bid was being discussed more than a year ago, before the Asian order was lost. At that the IGE share price was rising from 8p to 12p. It was very disappointing that by the time the bid was agreed in outline there were a number of companies seeking to raise money and the best price that IGE could get was 4p. They decided that it was still worth going ahead. Given the market now values IGE at around 3p, I don't see how anyone can fairly argue that 4p was too low.
amt: Oh dear that's a blow but hopefully mostly in the already collapsed share price.
monty68: Clocktower I have been in this company from the start. This board has made great progress in the last few years and has revived a almost dead company. One cancelled contract which caused a share fall out of all proporotion to its actual significance, an over blown problem with a logical share disposal and general market conditions have caused the current share price. The deal made perfect sense and Rise opposition is unfortuneate and unforeseen. The meeting thanked Bill and the board for the work they had put into the deal and regreted it had not come off. I am sure we will see continued progress, but this just makes it harder.
gnnmartin: The rupee is down 9% so far this year and the Turkish lira is down 40% (if I remember correctly). Other emerging currencies are weak too (I read in the FT). This may make life a bit more difficult for IGE, since I think some of their business is selling security devices in emerging markets. Perhaps this is a factor in the share price weakness. I haven't checked in the latest annual report, too lazy, too little time. I can't attend the meeting on 4th, unfortunately. I'll ask my nominee to vote my shares in favour of the motions.
pru dent: I hate clichés but I think we all need to wake up and smell the coffee! The Board is facing a situation where they must be questioning just who is running the company, who is dictating policy, who decides on future planning? Bill Mawer and his team have done a great job over the last few years. On the defecit, they have had one major order go pear-shaped and had to deal with an awkward investor sell out at a bad time. Neither of these things were as a result of poor management. On the flip side Bill Had got the share price up to 13p less than a year ago prior to these events. The purchase of Todd it seems to me was the outcome of two years of planning, to integrate an instantly positive contribution and more importantly the smooth cash contribution of maintenance contracts which are a joy to any tech company add to that the open doors to a whole bunch of new customers to approach for IGE's current offerings. This was a real opportunity to grow the company in all our interests. The share price closed at 4p on Friday. Bill really needs our support and whilst my holding is not large I will make sure it will be lodged firmly in favor (if we ever get to the Sep 4th meeting) My real concern is the worst case scenario which would be Bill questioning how much longer he should bang his head against the wall. Trying to run the company with one shareholder calling the shots. What would the company be worth without Bill? Looking back to the bad old days when we had a share price of 1p we had poor management and poor prospects. If the desire is to return to that then let's make sure we have enough ammo to shoot our feet clean off! Bill needs our support and we need him in place.
mr macgregor: They might be back to Boundary Capital for more soon then : ) There was a cash outflow again last year despite the decent reported profit. Thinking about it, how good was that profit? On October 4th the directors pulled a rabbit out of the hat which gave a big boost to the share price. On 29th August they had anticipated a full year profit of £250k. Then a multi-unit portable X-ray order was placed earlier than expected and the Company accelerated the completion of units intended for delivery later in the year for another customer to satisfy this new order. Expected profit nearly doubled to £450k. Now, were they robbing Peter to pay Paul ie. using legal though aggressive accountancy to boost H2 2017 profit at the expense of H1 2018? And was there any connection with the shaky £1m Asian export order? We know they take up front payments. It's possible to envisage a scenario where profits were boosted to increase the share price to the advantage of Boulder Capital who timed their exit remarkably well and according to Paul Scott in his Stockopedia report on 31st January "they tried first to sell at 10p, then reduced the price to 8p, when the market price had been around 11-12p." They seemed keen to get out. How many investors were aware of that secondary placing or were they just puzzling over the share price collapse? Paul took part in the placing and says "It's difficult to shake off the feeling that those of us who took part in the 8p secondary placing were stitched up!" As for Boundary Capital boasting about their investment strategy, with the benefit of hindsight it looks they were just using the bigger fool method but did they have an advantage through their connections with the company?
Image Scan share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
add chat code
Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:43 V: D:20180925 07:35:19