Harvest Minerals Share Discussion Threads

[kreature] 07/1/2017 19:17

Camargo?

831.144/2010
831.145/2010
831.146/2010

[andy] 07/1/2017 17:52

sandbag7 Jan '17 - 13:14 - 1806 of 1812 1 0
Andy,

'kin hell, keep your knickers on! It was only a suggestion.

I'm no sure why you're geting excited by my reply, it's simple, her name is on the RNS as the contact person.



"There are several possibilities as to why you can't get through but judging by your attitude it's probable that the office phone shows the incoming caller's number and when they see it's you they ignore you".


The issue with that possibility is as they haven't answered the phone or engaged with me they haven't a clue who I am or what I want!

But I won't let facts get in the way of your story.



"Incoming call, someone answer it" "No, don't bother it's only Mr Angry"

LOL! Why on earth do you think I was "angry"?

Again I won't allow your story to be ruined by the actual facts.


You're a touchy lot here, everyone filtering someone who is positive on the stock, a rarity on a BB, possibly a first even?

[kreature] 07/1/2017 16:03

Your opinion on the status of the RV2 company might be more interesting. ATB

[charles clore] 07/1/2017 15:23

yp - it's my personal view, just exercising an option

[whl2] 07/1/2017 14:54

I believe he's refering to kreature

[charles clore] 07/1/2017 14:16

sandbag - I filtered Andy because he either didn't want to properly read what was written or chose to malign, strangely enough, in favour of the troll who as we know attempts to inject negativity and doubt at almost every opportunity. They do not contribute to the debate here and imho are much better filtered.

[sandbag] 07/1/2017 13:14

Andy,

'kin hell, keep your knickers on! It was only a suggestion.

There are several possibilities as to why you can't get through but judging by your attitude it's probable that the office phone shows the incoming caller's number and when they see it's you they ignore you.
"Incoming call, someone answer it" "No, don't bother it's only Mr Angry"

I think Charles had the right idea -Filtered.

[kreature] 07/1/2017 12:54

'Miton UK Microcap Trust PLC', and 'MITON GROUP PLC', but was only Miton Group PLC on the significant shareholder list last year? How does that work?

Miton Group PLC


Miton UK Microcap Trust PLC


October 2016

EDWARDS FAMILY - 30,399,990 - 30.6%

AMERICAS INVESTMENTS & PARTICIPATION LIMITED
13,000,000 - 13.1%

KMINE HOLDING LTD
13,000,000 - 13.1%

MITON GROUP 
7,555,220 - 7.64%

HARGREAVES LANSDOWN (NOMINEES)
5,749,969 - 5.79%

[andy] 07/1/2017 12:31

sandbag,

So she's a one woman shop is she?

You're suggesting that contact details posted at the bottom of an RNS rely on one person, and if she's on an extended leave, or ill, there's nobody to cover for her?

What use are the contact details then?

[kreature] 07/1/2017 11:41

She might be busy doing her tax. I think it has to be in by the end of this month.

[sandbag] 07/1/2017 11:34

Andy,Perhaps she's added a few days holidays to the Christmas / New Year break and gone off on holiday.

[andy] 07/1/2017 10:17

What's more interesting for the company that nobody knows an email contact address for is this, on the 28th December holdings RNS, the following information is given as a contact at the bottom.


Contact name: Julie Cameron
------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
15. Contact telephone number: [phone]
------------------------------------------------------------- --------------


I have rung that number many times, (it's in Jersey), and it goes straight to a recorded message and answerphone.

I have left my name and phone number several times and nobody has returned my call, and whenever I ring that number, nobody ever replies, it's always on the answerphone!

If anyone doubts me, feel free to dial it and see for yourself!

(Calls to Jersey are outside the UK for mobile call purposes).

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 19:22

That is true Cottoner, they could still hold circa 1.8M.

I meant 'Milton' I could't read my own writing haha!

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 19:15

That's a lot of maths for a Friday night! Should be interesting to see what gets reported next week then!

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 19:14

I wonder if anymore warrants have been taken up? Last report said there were 11,936,500 warrants outstanding, due to expire 31st May 2017 I believe.

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 19:11

Correction: 1,874,304 shares missing.

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 19:09

If Edwards holding went to Pershing, then that accounts for 838,334 shares, as it is now 29,561,656 - before: 30,399,990.

With Mitons missing 7,555,220, Hargreaves have gone up by 3,259,625 shares.

That gives a total of 4,097,959 and leaves 1,035,970 shares unaccounted for.

[cottoner] 06/1/2017 19:05

Doesn't necessarily mean Milton have sold out completely.

Because they are no longer a significant shareholder means they don't own more than 3%

They could still hold up to 3.16m shares without being a significant shareholder.

There could also be other shareholders holding millions (up to 3.16) without having to disclose their holdings.


Also there was a discrepancy in the amount of shares held by the Edwards family between what was on the website and what was in RNses.

A number of RNSes , the last being issued on Dec 28th 2016 , indicated that their shareholding had remained stable @ 22,041,000 shares since at least Sept 22nd 2016.

[kreature] 06/1/2017 18:48

Before 75,705,179

After 70,571,250

difference of negative 5,133,929 shares (around £900k ?)

well, best of luck with all of that next week

[kryptonsnake] 06/1/2017 18:39

I am 'guessing' Miton sold their holding, looks like Hargreaves purchased half, and perhaps another institution purchased the other half.

Makes sense based on the figures. If the data is correct on the website, then I would expect some holdings RNS's next week.