Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[chinese_takeaway] 28/10/2019 17:23

Yes this focuses the importance of how many they have bought back.https://twitter.com/Paul47293202/status/1188848946455728129?s=19

[steephill cove] 28/10/2019 17:20

Trump talked about Kurdish Oil at 25:50

[steephill cove] 28/10/2019 17:19

Trump talked about a key Kurdistan airport at 21:00

[steephill cove] 28/10/2019 17:15

Trump did not say to tap Syrian Oil at all in his speech. He did not say either that Exxon wanted contacts for Syrian Oil. CNBC have misinterpreted what he said.

[chinese_takeaway] 28/10/2019 17:04

Yes this focuses the importance of how many they have bought back.https://twitter.com/Paul47293202/status/1188848946455728129?s=19

[bigdog5] 28/10/2019 17:02

johnyboy it won't be worth 74p if Baghdad alter the PSC's to service contracts.

[angina] 28/10/2019 16:32

Would share dealings not be suspended if the B-S re "sold 04Oct" had any substance ??

[urals] 28/10/2019 16:05

https://twitter.com/Paul47293202/status/1188848946455728129?s=19

[mcfly02] 28/10/2019 15:52

Yes it's you and Paul Carrol and David Hills using many different avatars.

Biggest bunch of clueless muppets going 🤡

Remind us of all your other failed ramps in the last ten years 😂

Share price FLAT !

Edit: share price currently down on the ramp.

[angina] 28/10/2019 15:52

Our CA, LLB colleagues over on LSE are performing micro-economic surgery around the premise that GKP was sold early October, and we'll hear the Good News re our long awaited golden payouts via an RNS/Panorama/CNN news flash on 1Nov.You guys heard anything ?

[gkphero] 28/10/2019 15:50

Agree nest.

I expect at least £74 per share, but am secretly holding for £150 per share. :)

[nestoframpers] 28/10/2019 15:44

Some posters on LSE reckon GKP is sold . That would be good , but it's gotta be for £74 or more.

[nestoframpers] 28/10/2019 15:42

GOD BLESS AMERICA
Member since: 28 Oct 2019
FREE
Follow Message
1
Posts

0
Followers

0
Following

[0ili0] 28/10/2019 14:32

GBA - yup. All about the barrels.

[0ili0] 28/10/2019 14:30

M5- - do you know how corrupt this place is? PMs get read before you've looked lolDid y ever dabble in Ricardo QXL?

[god bless america] 28/10/2019 14:23

FROM THE DONALD.

No, I think it's great. Look, we don't want to keep soldiers between Syria and Turkey for the next 200 years. They've been fighting for hundreds of years. We're out. But we are leaving soldiers to secure the oil. And we may have to fight for the oil. It's okay. Maybe somebody else wants the oil, in which case they have a hell of a fight.


But there's massive amounts of oil. And we're securing it for a couple of reasons. Number one, it stops ISIS, because ISIS got tremendous wealth from that oil. We have taken it. It's secured. Number two -- and again, somebody else may claim it, but either we'll negotiate a deal with whoever is claiming it, if we think it's fair, or we will militarily stop them very quickly.


And he's been very much involved in this subject. And he's -- he's a very strong hawk. But I think Lindsey agrees with what we're doing now. And, again, there are plenty of other countries that can help them patrol. I don't want to leave 1,000 or 2,000 or 3,000 soldiers on the border. But where Lindsey and I totally agree is the oil.


The oil is, you know, so valuable for many reasons. It fueled ISIS, number one. Number two, it helps the Kurds, because it's basically been taken away from the Kurds. They were able to live with that oil. And number three, it can help us because we should be able to take some also. And what I intend to do, perhaps, is make a deal with an Exxon Mobil or one of our great companies to go in there and do it properly.

Right now, it's not big. It's big oil underground, but it's not big oil up top, and much of the machinery has been shot and dead. It's been through wars. But -- and -- and spread out the wealth. But, no, we're protecting the oil. We're securing the oil. Now, that doesn't mean we don't make a deal at some point.

But I don't want to be -- they're fighting for 1,000 years, they're fighting for centuries. I want to bring our soldiers back home. But I do want to secure the oil. If you read about the history of Donald Trump -- I was a civilian. I had absolutely nothing to do with going into Iraq, and I was totally against it. But I always used to say, "If they're going to go in…" -- nobody cared that much, but it got written about.

If they're going to go in… -- I'm sure you've heard the statement, because I made it more than any human being alive. "If they're going into Iraq, keep the oil." They never did. They never did. I know Lindsey Graham had a bill where basically we would have been paid back for all of the billions of dollars that we've spent -- many, many billions of dollars.

[m5] 28/10/2019 14:02

No mate, we got stone walled by the so call called authorities. We had enough evidence to choke a donkey, but because they had been negligent they closed it all down. Absolute disgrace. I will never believe an RNS again. As you say the share price tells you all you need to know and when there is a disparity between what you are being told and what the share price says, alarm bells should be ringing. Massive and very expensive lesson learnt. There is no regulation, everybody should be aware.

[0ili0] 28/10/2019 13:54

M5- did you ever get anywhere with MDX?

[habshan] 28/10/2019 13:42

"Trump wants to make a deal with Exxon or others to tap Syrian oil: ‘We should be able to take some."

"President Donald Trump on Sunday said he’s interested in making a deal with ExxonMobil or another energy company to tap Syrian oil reserves."

“This is a win-win, The SDF (Syrian Defence Force) will get more money if we can modernize the oil fields.”

[chinese_takeaway] 28/10/2019 13:32

£100 GKPHERO?Possible , but really would need a 100m + pre agreed share buyback and cancellation to get close to that.£25-50 my estimate

[bigdog5] 28/10/2019 13:31

Imo johnyboy you should be certified.

[gkphero] 28/10/2019 13:28

IMO, we will see £100+ per share here.