Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[fake taxi] 10/10/2016 15:40

Im sure he is quacking in his boots, hilarious.

[lobo] 10/10/2016 15:37

1waving10 Oct '16 - 15:19 - 521256
Sheikh Adi is a billion barrel discovery with a lot more exploration potential at Prospect A, the Western side of SA, the Northern connectivity towards Swara Tika and North East connectivity into Atrush.


Then its a real shame that GKP had to pay the MNR $10m to take it back.

Not forgetting the exploration costs, that the MNR will never give back as per PSC agreement.

[oil_investor] 10/10/2016 15:32

lifeson: it's GARBAGE.

[lifeson] 10/10/2016 15:29

1waving, perdition (like it!) avatar created today and only post to big-up the 'SA was worthless' nonsense that Oilman63, cutthecagain and others have been peddling here of late. As transparent as a very transparent thing.

More Gokana, Afren, SH-6 (nicebut) cobblers I'm afraid, it's all they seem to cling onto.

[1waving] 10/10/2016 15:19

Sheik Adi is not " duff " and there is no evidence whatsoever on here or elsewhere to say so, but it does seem some are trying to trash SA without one iota of evidence.

The 2014 CPR which had the SA DST summaries in, and the 2015 CPR are still the main authorities on SA together with info released by RNS and official GKP releases.

Sheikh Adi is a billion barrel discovery with a lot more exploration potential at Prospect A, the Western side of SA, the Northern connectivity towards Swara Tika and North East connectivity into Atrush.

[perdition] 10/10/2016 15:03

so are you saying oilman that this outfit under TK direction WITHHELD info about SA being duff?
infor that if it had been released would have cost TK etc money re price Gokana got for the shares?

are you saying that you have got copies of DSTs that can prove that BEFORE THE TIME they gave out positive sounding RNS on SA they KNEW they had a big problem?

if all answers are yes, surely there might be other juicy bits for the authorities to look at?

including Lithuanian rumours amongst other places?

would it lead to big questions about timing around 9p placing?

did ANY of the placees KNOW at the time they agreed to stump up cash that they were walking into something good?
that was NOT yet public knowledge?

if I am reading you rightly the peeps here and elsewhere might soon owe you big thanks

[1waving] 10/10/2016 15:02

Brent up to new recent highs $53.40. ( Over last high in June )

[lardner23] 10/10/2016 14:49

Can't help there, cut. I'm not really a fan of regulatory bodies. I'm hoping other avenues will bear more fruit.

[cutthecagain] 10/10/2016 14:30

It would be interesting to know what the procedure would be wrt reporting to the SFO.

The demise of Afren happened fairly quickly after the SFO got involved with the Directors there, nothing was salvaged for shareholders and did the Directors end up with a fine?

WR, thanks - that's extremely helpful to my
case

[1712notout] 10/10/2016 14:25

Amazing really the proof was there at £4

No title to any assets



But the city were selling then

Huge buy
👀😬👍👀8522;😊Ԁ64;👌😎;

[lardner23] 10/10/2016 14:21

We can only find out if the SFO (or any other body that has been approached) is interested if shareholders draw it to their attention. They are already looking at the Afren story.

All the Kozel era events are important and relevant, and probably more significant/costly than Nadz. I don't intend to let it drop, however; the guy has serious baggage that should have been seen as yet another of nicebut's big red flags. There are many unanswered questions. It's better to spot potential problems 'live' rather than suffer the consequences at a later date.

[bigdog5] 10/10/2016 14:19

Has the Reverend called his flock for a conference call, are "todays" (today's LOFL) revelations about to be counter spun? Perhaps dear old JG with all his numbers on the "four" assets should be contacted for a comment.

Lobo, absolutely, the proof is there at 2p. Quite how it stays there when over the weeks the sells far outweigh the buys.

Those "clowns" on Blackfriars Bridge I would suggest had it correct all those years ago.

[wildrider7] 10/10/2016 14:18

meanwhile




make of that what you will

[cutthecagain] 10/10/2016 14:05

You miss the point Lardner, these matters may concern you but would the SFO be interested?

Here we have a CEO who (according to court records) controls and benefits from a trust that took part in a placing in a closed period and (according to court records) sold shares in the peak of a pump and dump (which I understand was also a closed period).

A CEO who according to Lithuanian investors was spreading rumours in the pump and advising them to buy which is a definite Jim Trot.

Then there's the fact that the trustee was most likely to have been classed as a PDMR while the trust took part in the(closed period) placing.

The fact that the company LIED to us shareholders about the trust

Shaikan 6
Sheikh Adi

Threats which I'm sure can be easily verified..... And which have potentially come to fruition.

[nicebut] 10/10/2016 14:04

1712,

I see a share price of 2p- That`s before 22bn shares are placed. What do you see?

I think we`ll be saying goodbye to whole numbers very soon....

I don`t know why I unfiltered you- Got carried away.

[lobo] 10/10/2016 14:01

Bd,

The BHs don't need to worry because the restructure is not going to happen. It was all a ruse to flush out the real bidders. There's 18 of them don't you know?

[1712notout] 10/10/2016 14:00

The finalisation of second amendment imminent 😀😎😊😊8526;😇ԅ22;

Then we see what's what 👌

[lardner23] 10/10/2016 13:58

I disagree, cut. Just because there is evidence to suggest there was wrong-doing in the past, in my view that doesn't mean shareholders should turn a blind eye to current behaviour, ie. the company squandering money on the MP's outrageous salary and, imo, unjustified bonuses (at whose behest?).

They are not mutually exclusive.

[1712notout] 10/10/2016 13:57

😎👀👀😇8522;😎Ԁ64;😊

Second amendment finalisations
Third party interest
Arrears
Forward payment regulation
Etc etc
Huge buy