ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

GKP Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd

119.80
0.80 (0.67%)
10 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd LSE:GKP London Ordinary Share BMG4209G2077 COM SHS USD1.00 (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.80 0.67% 119.80 119.60 120.40 122.10 118.20 121.50 1,044,114 16:35:28
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs 123.51M -11.5M -0.0517 -23.13 266.04M
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd is listed in the Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker GKP. The last closing price for Gulf Keystone Petroleum was 119p. Over the last year, Gulf Keystone Petroleum shares have traded in a share price range of 81.70p to 154.60p.

Gulf Keystone Petroleum currently has 222,443,000 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Gulf Keystone Petroleum is £266.04 million. Gulf Keystone Petroleum has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -23.13.

Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

Showing 521576 to 521593 of 706100 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  20864  20863  20862  20861  20860  20859  20858  20857  20856  20855  20854  20853  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
08/10/2016
16:44
LOl .. The LIST has got them rattled but why ?
ccr1958
08/10/2016
16:30
On the subject of talking this down
Where's the mighty Zors?

1712notout
08/10/2016
16:04
JB
Stop talking this down JB
👀

1712notout
08/10/2016
15:35
Holding for at least a 10 bagger with GKP.

Thanks.

gkphero
08/10/2016
14:46
We're part of a cohort, apparently, Phillis :))
lardner23
08/10/2016
14:40
Why is my name on a list?
Anybody?

phillis
08/10/2016
14:07
Bob all that info from one hole ! RF , OIP and development costs . Clearly the Shaikan data room will tell bidders a lot more than they are telling us. How much do they have to add on per bll for staff Accommodation, flights and temperature control I wonder .
nestoframpers
08/10/2016
13:37
Huge buy
💪😳😜😇 8519;👍ԅ63;😇😇;👍

Bad naughty dog 😎

1712notout
08/10/2016
12:53
Oh dear, it was all about the expensive debt rather than the barrels after all. Still, it should allow you to add to your holdings at 1p, so what's not to like?
bigdog5
08/10/2016
12:37
transmar: I expressed doubts about PPC quite a long time ago. What happened is that their Chairman, one Peter Levine, put quite a lot of his personal money into it. And on the basis that such a person is not likely to invest his own money unless it was a virtual dead cert, various people followed his lead. This is the classic "skin in the game" argument, but there is case after case which shows that in oil and gas exploration, investments by directors are an unreliable pointer to drilling results.

The PPC share price went up...and then it came down again. After a bit of a recent rise, it was hit hard a couple of days ago because of a serious operational problem with one of their wells. ZENGAS sold his shares, after being very bullish on PPC for the past two or three years.

The majority of these E&Ps cannot discover or acquire good acreage. GKP is one of the exceptions, and Shaikan is an exceptional discovery.

Where "luck" comes into it is a very complex question. My view is that there is a high level of determinism in the sector: the acreage is either good or not good, that was determined in the ancient past. So the outcome is decided by the acquisition of the acreage in the first place. Perhaps the "luck" element is more to do with subsequent management processes: avoiding waste, keeping the doors closed to irregularities, etc?

oil_investor
08/10/2016
12:31
Just a suggestion you understand, and this should in no way be construed as inciting physical violence (my solicitor made me put that bit in), but why don't Cut, Bob and Tony meet up and kick each others balls in.

If this results in my receiving a visit from the police I will be glad. It gets so lonely in the evenings, talking to myself, with only my voices to listen to.

owdbuffer
08/10/2016
12:17
WildRider7: I think Lardner23 means that they are listed twice. Hardly an issue, because there are numerous other you can insert as a replacement lol
oil_investor
08/10/2016
12:17
I'd echo what Zengas posted above.

First error: I have never been in the SAG, so it appears you are making assumptions
Second error: I have never been in the SAG, so it appears you are making assumptions

lardner23
08/10/2016
12:16
Zengas,

what happened over at PPC you were promoting?

Were you "unlucky" AGAIN?

transmar
08/10/2016
12:12
@lardner23 - #520808
'WR, there are two errors in your post above.'


what do you mean 2? have a recount unless of course I have forgotten a few?

Oilman63,
Ben Submarine, and his thousand clones
Cutthecagain,
Zengas,
Phillis,
Lardner23,
Terryhardacre,
FakeTaxi
1302SB,
SharesIQ88,
Lardner23,
tess_tickle
joseki

wildrider7
08/10/2016
12:10
Wildrider

I don't know what i'm doing on your list. Is this something you dream up and compiled as some kind of list of 'suspects' that don't happen to share your views ?

I know none of the others either. I take it 'Shaggers' was the shareholders action group - if it is, I did not join it or put my name to it. I stated what I planned to do on my own behalf without needing to join any group. I have a mind of my own. Maybe you should get your facts right because that is symptomatic of the state of this discussion board while all the way the company has gone down the tubes in terms of value regardless of your compilations.

zengas
08/10/2016
12:07
How Todd met Inga, from the Lithuanian article.


"The billionaire did not pay attention even to the rumors that the beautiful girl could be in America after completing a special barracudas school of the allure of the rich.
It is said that soon after the acquaintance couple flew to Las Vegas and got married there."


Mind you, knowing she went to the Barracuda's School has meant he never dare ask her for a blow job.

owdbuffer
08/10/2016
12:04
ALASKA NORTH SLOPE DISCOVERY - COMPARISON WITH SHAIKAN AND SHAIKAN WEST

Caelus Energy Alaska has just announced a major discovery of light oil in the Arctic Ocean. It is in shallow water, only about four to six feet deep, less than two miles offshore. Two wells have been drilled from ice pads, five miles apart.

Seasonal constraints meant that Caelus "did not have time to flow test either well" and the company has assessed the discovery based upon side-wall coring which confirmed the presence of quality sandstones containing oil. The next appraisal well is currently planned for 2018.

No third-party analysis has been conducted of the results. Caelus report that the hydrocarbon column is more than 1000 feet, with the wells giving net pay figures of 183 feet and 223 feet. The oil has an API of 40 to 45 degrees.

Using 3D seismic data over an area of 124 square miles, Caelus estimate that the discovery is 6 billion barrels Oil In Place. They give a Recovery Factor of 30% to 40%, representing 1.8 billion to 2.4 billion barrels recoverable.

Jim Musselman, the Caelus CEO, appears to be suggesting that the reservoir will need to be artificially fractured as part of a commercial development. The number of wells required to produce the oil is quoted by the company as 250, with first oil not before 2022. The total cost of the Full Field Development is estimated at $8 billion to $10 billion. At least 125 miles of pipeline would be needed, at a cost of $800 million, and part of the pipeline would need to be buried in trenches along the shore in order to prevent chunks of shore ice crashing into the pipeline.

Such a development in the Arctic Ocean would clearly be a massive project. But despite that, this discovery is considered of very great importance.

Now when we compare this discovery with the one at Shaikan and Shaikan West (Sheikh Adi) we see:

* Shaikan onshore not offshore

* Shaikan easy to develop and operate throughout the year

* Shaikan naturally fractured

* Shaikan Oil In Place is double the North Slope discovery

* Shaikan can be developed with far fewer wells

* Shaikan export pipeline already in operation, 10-mile KRG feeder pipeline on the horizon

* Shaikan appraised and approaching 30 million barrels of dry oil already produced

* Shaikan Jurassic oil column more than three times as big

* Shaikan Jurassic net pay four to five times as great

* Shaikan footprint smaller, facilitating development

* Shaikan Upper Jurassic oil thicker, but free-flowing due to no wax content

* Shaikan also has light oil and condensate below the currently producing interval

* the current Shaikan CPR, despite the use of lower Recovery assumptions etc. by ERC, has a Category 3 Recoverable Barrels figure (high case) of 2.6 billion boe, which is bigger than the North Slope discovery.

But of course Shaikan is worthless.

So some people would have you believe...

But not Crestal Energy and their COO Designate, one assumes?

More on Crestal Energy later.

Just a mull.

oil_investor
Chat Pages: Latest  20864  20863  20862  20861  20860  20859  20858  20857  20856  20855  20854  20853  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock