Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[hearts1] 07/10/2016 13:27

'the TELEPHONE CALLS TO EMPLOYERS TRYING TO GET INNOCENT SHAREHOLDERS SACKED'You can hardly call Paul innocent can you? Should we get CID to look at his multi avatar posting history across 3 different sites?

[oil_investor] 07/10/2016 13:25

Hilarious!

The rant by Jeremy Asher's prominent supporter resurfaces.

[tess_tickle] 07/10/2016 13:24

TEAM HILLareous.

[terry hardacre] 07/10/2016 13:23

Zengas - is this the post you were referring to by any chance?

grharrison14 Jul '13 - 16:02 - 298491 of 520611 25 4
Bob...

SIMPLE REQUEST

As I made clear on here some weeks ago,
I really did not appreciate
you publishing our private and confidential discussions...

that constituted an absolute breach of trust in my opinion
from which there can be no turning back

Nor did I appreciate you phoning me a couple of weeks back in a very threatening manner...

I think that you might have done the same or similar to Oilman...
both of us having been friendly with you

At that time, I made it VERY clear to you that I wish to have nothing to do with you so far as GKP is concerned...

and that I am not prepared to talk with you

on or off the blogs re GKP

So I REALLY do not appreciate your phoning me just 5 mins ago ...
to say that 'unless you talk with me I will publish our private conversations'

as far as I am concerned ...that is simple blackmail

Please desist and please do not threaten or call me again...

I simply do not wish to engage with you regarding GKP

where we hold VERY different opinions

and where each of us is reliant upon our own backgrounds/experience...
which are very different

please respect my own right to vote as I choose

I am not going to post here for a while

Thank you

Regards
GRH1

[1302sb] 07/10/2016 13:22

When you're finished responding to Zengas, can I have some answers to my questions please Bob.

There's nothing offensive, threatening or even rude in my questions. Simple questions to answer for an honest man I would have thought

[zengas] 07/10/2016 13:20

Like I asked OI, Explain it.

I wonder why you can't.

[oil_investor] 07/10/2016 13:20

Hilarious!

Carry on, and dig yourself even deeper into the mire.

[oil_investor] 07/10/2016 13:17

Oh dear.

ZENGAS appears.

One wonders why...

[zengas] 07/10/2016 13:14

The most damming post of all - 298491

Explain that.

[hectorscrackwhores] 07/10/2016 13:10

tessy I think you got more chance of becoming a barista

[lardner23] 07/10/2016 13:10

Lovin' the concept of a fusion of Rumpold and Oxbridge don. Good idea but not quite there yet with the delivery. Needs more conviction. Strasberg may be able to help; I think the avatar High Resolution found him useful.

[tess_tickle] 07/10/2016 12:58

I would love to be the barrister on this case.

It wouldn't last much further than my opening statement.

[hectorscrackwhores] 07/10/2016 12:52

police knocking on doors eh?
so is that why cut and oilman both have false addresses

[tess_tickle] 07/10/2016 12:49

If someone threatens to beat your head in

and you continue to chat merrily along on

a bulletin board, to and fro.

Then expect the LAW to consider that,

YOU DIDN'T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.

[onetomany] 07/10/2016 12:47

The body will be found soon

[fake taxi] 07/10/2016 12:47

I think most here laugh at the notion of any serious police investigation. Just bitter losers with no where else to vent their frustration. Anyway that aside 1p or less is surely on the way, why is that? Oh yes, no offers, humongous debts, one trick tinpot pony with no negotiating leverage, and a lot more to boot, oh well.

[oil_investor] 07/10/2016 12:41

Nobody will learn what the Police are doing by asking questions like that.

Or indeed by any other questions.

[cutthecagain] 07/10/2016 12:39

If there is no VALID DEFENCE how do you plan to get away with it?

[oil_investor] 07/10/2016 12:37

Hilarious!

cutthecagain does not grasp the Criminal Law.

There is NO VALID DEFENCE against Criminal Harassment and Malicious Communications. Let alone against threats of violence.

I warned on here: read the CPS guidelines to the Police on this. But my warning was ignored.

[cutthecagain] 07/10/2016 12:31

The status of the police investigations is irrelevant until someone gets a knock on the door

At which point persons are going to have to explain why they said what they did

And present their own evidence

IMO this one is going to boomerang right back at you, if it ever gets off the ground.

Still what's the saying, there's no fool like an old fool.

Good luck :)