Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[pensioner2] 03/2/2022 12:06

Yep, £620k spent there, TFK.

[mr_todd_f_kozel] 03/2/2022 12:03

WORKED BUY ORDER 281,990 at 220.50 just gone through..See why the troll naysayers working so hard......................NOBULL LOLOLOLOL

[nobull] 03/2/2022 12:02

"nobull filtered
Clearly here to harm PI sentiment"

But you can still read me with your other monikers: ReleasetheKraken and MR_TODD_F_KOZEL. LOL.

[thebabe] 03/2/2022 11:55

WORKED BUY ORDER 281,990 at 220.50 just gone through.
.
See why the troll naysayers working so hard......................

[steephill cove] 03/2/2022 11:40

Im not taking anything less than 100 pounds sterling per share myself. Come on Jon Harris, pull that rabbit out of the hat. We have every confidence in you! 💪

[thebabe] 03/2/2022 11:32

Very low ball at 28 pounds a share TODD thats only $ 8/boe , which is what MOL have it in the books at , but the competition to buy Shaikan would be huge.
Its probably the largest supergiant on land not in hands of IOC.

Or NOC.

28 quid a share MINIMUM ON TAKEOVER???
.

[thebabe] 03/2/2022 11:32

nobull filtered
Clearly here to harm PI sentiment

[nobull] 03/2/2022 11:26

Yes, City Code on Takeovers in Rule 4.5 stops shares held in treasury being placed in safe hands to defeat a bid (that's another of your previous conspiracy theories debunked):

4.5 RESTRICTION ON THE OFFEREE COMPANY ACCEPTING
AN OFFER IN RESPECT OF TREASURY SHARES*
An offeree company may not accept an offer in respect of treasury
shares until after the offer is unconditional.

[thebabe] 03/2/2022 11:22

Nobull working very hard today , guffaw,
and expert on Probability theory as well as Bermuda company Law?
Very amusing

[thebabe] 03/2/2022 11:20

Very low ball at 28 pounds a share TODD thats only $ 8/boe , which is what MOL have it in the books at , but the competition to buy Shaikan would be huge.
Its probably the largest supergiant on land not in hands of IOC.

Or NOC.

28 quid a share MINIMUM ON TAKEOVER???
.

[nobull] 03/2/2022 11:08

"Buybacks at any price" theory deconstructed, and Paul, you, pump out a new one, £28 minimum takeover bid imminent. Attention whoring again for new victims?

I'd take £4 for my shares in the extremely improbable event, at least in the short term, of a takeover offer emerging. Two in the last 12 years, and neither achieved a change of control. What makes you so sure one will emerge in the short term?

[mr_todd_f_kozel] 03/2/2022 10:20

28 quid a share MINIMUM ON TAKEOVER???.HTTPS://twitter.com/ChicagoJack5/status/1488880975006375936?t=5qn9p9CNjticyJFP2fK_bQ&s=19

[mr_todd_f_kozel] 03/2/2022 10:14

HTTPS://twitter.com/ChicagoJack5/status/1488108778046242819?t=M22GzBFW2_1i_Tfrz_WxzA&s=19

[mr_todd_f_kozel] 03/2/2022 10:14

HTTPS://twitter.com/ChicagoJack5/status/1488880975006375936?t=YZVJL1gUD3Fc5Puko5L0MA&s=19

[nobull] 03/2/2022 10:13

"So if the bye-laws comply with the listing rules then they would be able to acquire shares on any terms without any breach of the listing rules? Is that what you're saying?"

No. They are two sets of different rules made by different people. The one set that is the more restrictive is the one that effectively limits GKP's actions. In wording the Bye Laws, a lawyer maybe has to think the other rule maker might change their rules, so to take that into account, the lawyer must give GKP the maximum flexibility in the Bye Laws - he doesn't want the bye laws unintentionally inhibiting GKP's freedom to act how it pleases.

[pensioner2] 03/2/2022 10:00

So if the bye-laws comply with the listing rules then they would be able to acquire shares on any terms without any breach of the listing rules? Is that what you're saying?

[mr_todd_f_kozel] 03/2/2022 09:57

HTTPS://twitter.com/ChicagoJack5/status/1488880975006375936?t=YZVJL1gUD3Fc5Puko5L0MA&s=19