We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd | LSE:GKP | London | Ordinary Share | BMG4209G2077 | COM SHS USD1.00 (DI) |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.90 | -1.37% | 136.50 | 132.80 | 136.30 | 137.40 | 134.60 | 136.50 | 650,681 | 16:35:14 |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs | 123.51M | -11.5M | -0.0516 | -35.27 | 308.21M |
| Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/2/2022 09:56 | HTTPS://twitter.com/ | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 09:53 | Can you explain, nobull, why their advisors would permit/encourage/sug Pensioner, I think the resolution was probably to amend the Bye-Laws (what we call Articles of Association in the UK?). Obviously the Bye-Laws need to grant the maximum flexibility so that they are not even more restrictive than the Listing Rules that GKP voluntarily complies with. If I were a lawyer, I think I would adopt that exact wording to amend the bye-laws. | nobull | |
| 03/2/2022 09:51 | Been on ignore for yonks , like bdog etcThe effort they put in consistently is a HUGE BUY and ,HOLD SIGNAL | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 09:48 | HTTPS://twitter.com/ | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 09:48 | £28 a share MINIMUM ON TAKEOVERHTTPS://twit | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 09:47 | OAP he's paid.......To do a jobLOLOL | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 09:38 | Can you explain, nobull, why their advisors would permit/encourage/sug | pensioner2 | |
| 03/2/2022 09:30 | "Actions during the course of an offer by the offeree company which might frustrate the offer are generally prohibited unless shareholders approve these plans." If shareholders approve a buy back they can be done at any time, even during a bid, but in practice, I would have thought buybacks during a bid would be near impossible to carry out simply because of the limitations on the price that is allowed to be paid by the Listing Rules. Doing special buyback deals with particular shareholders (off market transactions?) at any time violates the principle of basic fairness that all shareholders should be free to sell into a buyback, one of the principles that companies listed in the UK should follow. Our company voluntarily complies with Chapter 12 of the Listing Rules on buybacks. Secret buybacks, using proxies, call options, off market or otherwise, whether approved or not by the Bermuda Companies Act, or whatever other theory Paul cares to suggest would seem to violate this principle. The Bermuda Companies Act probably is not the biggest constraint on GKP's potential buyback plans, if GKP has any. JMV. | nobull | |
| 03/2/2022 09:28 | The low volume on Tuesday does look to be a CNY associated event as volumes seem to have recovered now. | pensioner2 | |
| 03/2/2022 09:09 | we could have another bumper payment The current outstanding arrears balance is $28.6 million net to GKP related to the January and February 2020 invoices | nestoframpers | |
| 03/2/2022 09:08 | Last from Gramacho -------------------- “Gram, it really has been good to talk! I've been (slightly) concerned about the high water content in the Baluti ever since the Final DGA Report came out. But I'm becoming ever more of the opinion that the results are a consequence of incorrect CPI calculation assumptions / parameters. The comment in your last post: "Seems odd to me however that they have found a phi = 9% interval with Sw = 47%, yet the interval(s) with phi = 17% have Sw > 60%. Wouldn't you have expected the saturations to be reversed?" is absolutely spot-on and another indication that something is wrong with the CPI calculations. The underlying principle that invariably holds true is that the Bulk Volume of Water, (BVW = PHI x Sw), should remain more or less constant in an oil zone situated well above the OWC. So as porosity PHI increases then water saturation Sw should decrease (and vice versa). The fact that both PHI and Sw are substantially higher in Net Reservoir compared to Net Pay (where BOTH are lower) does point to something not quite right with the Parameters in the CPI calculation model. The lithological column in the DGA Report (Figure 2) shows that the Baluti comprises mostly shale although the boundary with the Butmah above and the Kurre Chine below is not that clear and references in the literature are also uncertain (some classify that Baluti is Triassic rather than Jurassic): hxxp://books.google. Section 9.2.2.2 in the above states that "It comprises 60m of grey green and grey shales with decimetre beds of thin bedded dolomite, silicified, and oolitic limestones, and recrystallisation breccias". A petrophysicist's nightmare! Oolites could certainly explain the very high 'apparent' porosity (ooilites can be visualised as spherical balls of calcite with water trapped inside). And the shale can likewise lead to high 'apparent' porosity and Sw if not properly accounted for in the CPI calculation. DGA have definitely NOT accounted for shale in their Sw calculation because they only used a simplistic Archie model (bullet point 5 on page 17 of the DGA report). The Baluti Formation stands apart from all the others in the Zone Average Table (page 20 DGA Report) not only with regard to very low Net Pay c.f. Net Reservoir but it also has the highest Net/Gross and highest average porosity (by far) over Net Reservoir intervals. I think that all of these things taken together do point to a problem with the CPI calculation. I am not saying that a 'correct' CPI calculation is possible - sometimes things are just too complicated (shale + dolomite + silica + oolites + breccias!) and the only way to a definitive answer is to perforate and see what comes out. So back to my original point, why did they drop the planned DST in the lower Butmah! Regards, BBBS” -------------------- Moreover the Baluti anomaly in Sh-1 was discussed with John G in August 2010 and as noted in this post he indicated that it would probably be tested in a future well. [...] It should be possible at some point to confirm with John G whether this unnamed zone in Sh-2 is indeed the Baluti.] Q. How fast do you think the Ber Bahr well will drill? A. I think they will be done by March. That’s my guess Q. Do you think they are in a rush? A. They are getting after it they are not hanging about. Q. What is your understanding of the condition of the export lines to the north via Turkey? Is it realistic to assume that there is sufficient reliable capacity to handle major additions to exports when Afren, GKP and Genel ramp up production? A. There are two pipelines out of Kirkuk. One is out of commission and one is being used. The point from the loading station at Fishkabur out to Ceyhan apparently is in relatively good nick. A lot of the poor maintenance is to the south of the spur where we are. Q. Have there been a couple of incidents recently with that, has there been a leak recently? A. Yes they had a leak and the pressure lowered. There have been a couple of incidents where the federal Iraqi Gov reduced the throughput because of various maintenance and leaks etc. It is operating under capacity at the moment. Q. How far are you on with your pipeline? A. We’ve got a provisional scoping study in place. It is a 120km pipeline and if all goes to plan we will have in place at the end of next year. Q. So everything is planned then? A. The FEED study is out there. We have the design concept underway. It is all out there it is not pie in the sky. There is paperwork to accompany all of this stuff! So a big thank you to Oilman for attending and getting so many of our questions answered. Regards, Gramacho | bravedog | |
| 03/2/2022 08:35 | SOLD BEFORE VALENTINE'S DAY | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:32 | £28 a share MINIMUM ON TAKEOVERHTTPS://twit | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:32 | LOL @ Nobull. Thinking he knows better than HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS haha | goatcam | |
| 03/2/2022 08:31 | HTTPS://twitter.com/ | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:29 | For free LOLOLOLOL | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:28 | Jaap , please sack HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS, there's a clown here that knows better ....LOLOLOLOL | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:27 | BERENBERG RAISES GULF KEYSTONE PRICE TARGET TO 300 (280) PENCE - 'BUY | mr_todd_f_kozel | |
| 03/2/2022 08:26 | Where in the City Code on Takeover and Mergers does it say a company can't do buybacks? The listing rules in practice make it difficult, surely, to do buybacks at less than 5% of the VWAP if there is a bidder actively buying the stock in the market, I wonder? Your conspiracy theories get ever more complex. | nobull | |
| 03/2/2022 08:24 | BERENBERG RAISES GULF KEYSTONE PRICE TARGET TO 300 (280) PENCE - 'BUY | mr_todd_f_kozel |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
